Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2022

20-04-2022 | Cholangiocarcinoma | Gastrointestinal Oncology

A National Assessment of T2 Staging for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and the Poor Prognosis Associated with Multifocality

Authors: Kevin M. Turner, MD, Aaron M. Delman, MD, Jordan Kharofa, MD, Olugbenga Olowokure, MD, Davendra Sohal, MD, MPH, R. Cutler Quillin, III, MD, Shimul A. Shah, MD, Syed A. Ahmad, MD, Sameer H. Patel, MD, Gregory C. Wilson, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

T2 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is defined as a solitary tumors with vascular invasion or multifocal tumors including satellite lesions, multiple lesions, and intrahepatic metastases. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis associated with multifocal tumors.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2017 for patients with non-metastatic ICC. The patients were grouped based on T2 staging, multifocality, and lymph node involvement.

Results

The study enrolled and classified 4887 patients into clinical (c) stage groups as follows: 15.2% with solitary T2N0 (sT2N0) tumors, 21.3% with multifocal T2N0 (mT2N0) tumors, and 63.5% with node-positive (TxN1) disease. Patients with (c)sT2N0 tumors had higher rates of surgical resection than those with (c)mT2N0 or (c)TxN1 disease (33.5% vs 19.7% vs 15.0%; p < 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) was better for the patients with (c)sT2N0 tumors than for those with multifocal and node-positive disease (15.4 vs 10.4 vs 10.4 months; p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, (c)sT2N0 tumors were associated with better OS than (c)mT2N0 tumors [hazard ratio (HR), 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–1.46; p < 0.01] or (c)TxN1 disease (HR,1.41; 95% CI 1.28–1.56; p < 0.01). In a subset analysis based on pathologic (p) staging of patients who underwent surgical resection with regional lymphadenectomy, multivariate analysis demonstrated that (p)sT2N0 tumors were associated with better OS than (p)mT2N0 tumors (HR,1.40; 95% CI 1.03–1.92; p = 0.03) or (p)TxN1 disease (HR, 2.05; 95% CI 1.62–2.58; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Multifocal T2N0 ICC is associated with poor OS and has a disparate prognosis compared with solitary T2N0 disease, even among patients who undergo resection. Future staging criteria should account for the poor outcomes associated with multifocal ICC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zhang H, Yang T, Wu M, Shen F. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and surgical management. Cancer Lett. 2016;379:198–205.CrossRef Zhang H, Yang T, Wu M, Shen F. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and surgical management. Cancer Lett. 2016;379:198–205.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Singal AK, Vauthey JN, Grady JJ, Stroehlein JR. Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma—frequency and demographic patterns: thirty-year data from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137:1071–8.CrossRef Singal AK, Vauthey JN, Grady JJ, Stroehlein JR. Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma—frequency and demographic patterns: thirty-year data from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137:1071–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Buettner S, Galjart B, van Vugt JLA, et al. Performance of prognostic scores and staging systems in predicting long-term survival outcomes after surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1085–95.CrossRef Buettner S, Galjart B, van Vugt JLA, et al. Performance of prognostic scores and staging systems in predicting long-term survival outcomes after surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1085–95.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tabrizian P, Jibara G, Hechtman JF, et al. Outcomes following resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. HPB Oxford. 2015;17:344–51.CrossRef Tabrizian P, Jibara G, Hechtman JF, et al. Outcomes following resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. HPB Oxford. 2015;17:344–51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Weber SM, Ribero D, O’Reilly EM, Kokudo N, Miyazaki M, Pawlik TM. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB Oxford. 2015;17:669–80.CrossRef Weber SM, Ribero D, O’Reilly EM, Kokudo N, Miyazaki M, Pawlik TM. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB Oxford. 2015;17:669–80.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Buettner S, Ten Cate DWG, Bagante F, et al. Survival after resection of multiple tumor foci of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:2239–46.CrossRef Buettner S, Ten Cate DWG, Bagante F, et al. Survival after resection of multiple tumor foci of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:2239–46.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Addeo P, Jedidi I, Locicero A, et al. Prognostic impact of tumor multinodularity in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:1801–9.CrossRef Addeo P, Jedidi I, Locicero A, et al. Prognostic impact of tumor multinodularity in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:1801–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th edn. Berlin: Springer; 2017. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th edn. Berlin: Springer; 2017.
9.
go back to reference Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1188–95.CrossRef Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1188–95.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hyder O, Marques H, Pulitano C, et al. A nomogram to predict long-term survival after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an Eastern and Western experience. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:432–8.CrossRef Hyder O, Marques H, Pulitano C, et al. A nomogram to predict long-term survival after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an Eastern and Western experience. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:432–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3140–5.CrossRef de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3140–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, Pawlik TM. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:565–74.CrossRef Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, Pawlik TM. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:565–74.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zhang XF, Chakedis J, Bagante F, et al. Trends in use of lymphadenectomy in surgery with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2018;105:857–66.CrossRef Zhang XF, Chakedis J, Bagante F, et al. Trends in use of lymphadenectomy in surgery with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2018;105:857–66.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jutric Z, Johnston WC, Hoen HM, et al. Impact of lymph node status in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by major hepatectomy: a review of the National Cancer Database. HPB Oxford. 2016;18:79–87.CrossRef Jutric Z, Johnston WC, Hoen HM, et al. Impact of lymph node status in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by major hepatectomy: a review of the National Cancer Database. HPB Oxford. 2016;18:79–87.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Raoof M, Dumitra S, Ituarte PHG, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e170117.CrossRef Raoof M, Dumitra S, Ituarte PHG, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e170117.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chen Y, Weng S. Reappraisal of the T category for solitary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by tumor size in 611 early-stage (T1-2N0M0) patients after hepatectomy: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;25:1989–99.CrossRef Chen Y, Weng S. Reappraisal of the T category for solitary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by tumor size in 611 early-stage (T1-2N0M0) patients after hepatectomy: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;25:1989–99.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yamamoto Y, Sugiura T, Okamura Y, et al. The Evaluation of the eight edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a proposal of a modified new staging system. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:786–95.CrossRef Yamamoto Y, Sugiura T, Okamura Y, et al. The Evaluation of the eight edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a proposal of a modified new staging system. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:786–95.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wright GP, Perkins S, Jones H, et al. Surgical resection does not improve survival in multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comparison of surgical resection with intra-arterial therapies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:83–90.CrossRef Wright GP, Perkins S, Jones H, et al. Surgical resection does not improve survival in multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comparison of surgical resection with intra-arterial therapies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:83–90.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zhang XF, Xue F, He J, et al. Proposed modification of the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol. 2021;23:1456–66. Zhang XF, Xue F, He J, et al. Proposed modification of the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol. 2021;23:1456–66.
21.
go back to reference Conci S, Ruzzenente A, Viganò L, et al. Patterns of distribution of hepatic nodules (single, satellites or multifocal) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic impact after surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:3719–27.CrossRef Conci S, Ruzzenente A, Viganò L, et al. Patterns of distribution of hepatic nodules (single, satellites or multifocal) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic impact after surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:3719–27.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A National Assessment of T2 Staging for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and the Poor Prognosis Associated with Multifocality
Authors
Kevin M. Turner, MD
Aaron M. Delman, MD
Jordan Kharofa, MD
Olugbenga Olowokure, MD
Davendra Sohal, MD, MPH
R. Cutler Quillin, III, MD
Shimul A. Shah, MD
Syed A. Ahmad, MD
Sameer H. Patel, MD
Gregory C. Wilson, MD
Publication date
20-04-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11762-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2022 Go to the issue