Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Original Article

Chiropractic spinal manipulation and the risk for acute lumbar disc herniation: a belief elicitation study

Authors: Cesar A. Hincapié, J. David Cassidy, Pierre Côté, Y. Raja Rampersaud, Alejandro R. Jadad, George A. Tomlinson

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Chiropractic spinal manipulation treatment (SMT) is common for back pain and has been reported to increase the risk for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), but there is no high quality evidence about this. In the absence of good evidence, clinicians can have knowledge and beliefs about the risk. Our purpose was to determine clinicians’ beliefs regarding the risk for acute LDH associated with chiropractic SMT.

Methods

Using a belief elicitation design, 47 clinicians (16 chiropractors, 15 family physicians and 16 spine surgeons) that treat patients with back pain from primary and tertiary care practices were interviewed. Participants’ elicited incidence estimates of acute LDH among a hypothetical group of patients with acute low back pain treated with and without chiropractic SMT, were used to derive the probability distribution for the relative risk (RR) for acute LDH associated with chiropractic SMT.

Results

Chiropractors expressed the most optimistic belief (median RR 0.56; IQR 0.39–1.03); family physicians expressed a neutral belief (median RR 0.97; IQR 0.64–1.21); and spine surgeons expressed a slightly more pessimistic belief (median RR 1.07; IQR 0.95–1.29). Clinicians with the most optimistic views believed that chiropractic SMT reduces the incidence of acute LDH by about 60% (median RR 0.42; IQR 0.29–0.53). Those with the most pessimistic views believed that chiropractic SMT increases the incidence of acute LDH by about 30% (median RR 1.29; IQR 1.11–1.59).

Conclusions

Clinicians’ beliefs about the risk for acute LDH associated with chiropractic SMT varied systematically across professions, in spite of a lack of scientific evidence to inform these beliefs. These probability distributions can serve as prior probabilities in future Bayesian analyses of this relationship.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gouveia LO, Castanho P, Ferreira JJ (2009) Safety of chiropractic interventions: a systematic review. Spine 34:E405–E413CrossRefPubMed Gouveia LO, Castanho P, Ferreira JJ (2009) Safety of chiropractic interventions: a systematic review. Spine 34:E405–E413CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Snelling NJ (2006) Spinal manipulation in patients with disc herniation: a critical review of risk and benefit. Int J Osteopath Med 9:77–84CrossRef Snelling NJ (2006) Spinal manipulation in patients with disc herniation: a critical review of risk and benefit. Int J Osteopath Med 9:77–84CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, Shekelle PG (2003) A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain. Ann Intern Med 138:898–906CrossRefPubMed Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, Shekelle PG (2003) A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain. Ann Intern Med 138:898–906CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Furlan AD, Yazdi F, Tsertsvadze A, Gross A, Van Tulder M et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2012:953139CrossRef Furlan AD, Yazdi F, Tsertsvadze A, Gross A, Van Tulder M et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2012:953139CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Santilli V, Beghi E, Finucci S (2006) Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations. Spine J 6:131–137CrossRefPubMed Santilli V, Beghi E, Finucci S (2006) Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations. Spine J 6:131–137CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McMorland G, Suter E, Casha S, du Plessis SJ, Hurlbert RJ (2010) Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. J Manip Physiol Ther 33:576–584CrossRef McMorland G, Suter E, Casha S, du Plessis SJ, Hurlbert RJ (2010) Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. J Manip Physiol Ther 33:576–584CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bronfort G, Hondras MA, Schulz CA, Evans RL, Long CR et al (2014) Spinal manipulation and home exercise with advice for subacute and chronic back-related leg pain: a trial with adaptive allocation. Ann Intern Med 161:381–391CrossRefPubMed Bronfort G, Hondras MA, Schulz CA, Evans RL, Long CR et al (2014) Spinal manipulation and home exercise with advice for subacute and chronic back-related leg pain: a trial with adaptive allocation. Ann Intern Med 161:381–391CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Huang SL, Liu YX, Yuan GL, Zhang J, Yan HW (2015) Characteristics of lumbar disc herniation with exacerbation of presentation due to spinal manipulative therapy. Medicine 94:e661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang SL, Liu YX, Yuan GL, Zhang J, Yan HW (2015) Characteristics of lumbar disc herniation with exacerbation of presentation due to spinal manipulative therapy. Medicine 94:e661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG (1996) Complications of spinal manipulation: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Fam Pract 42:475–480PubMed Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG (1996) Complications of spinal manipulation: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Fam Pract 42:475–480PubMed
10.
go back to reference Powell FC, Hanigan WC, Olivero WC (1993) A risk/benefit analysis of spinal manipulation therapy for relief of lumbar or cervical pain. Neurosurgery 33:73–79PubMed Powell FC, Hanigan WC, Olivero WC (1993) A risk/benefit analysis of spinal manipulation therapy for relief of lumbar or cervical pain. Neurosurgery 33:73–79PubMed
11.
go back to reference Schmidley JW, Koch T (1984) The noncerebrovascular complications of chiropractic manipulation. Neurology 34:684–685CrossRefPubMed Schmidley JW, Koch T (1984) The noncerebrovascular complications of chiropractic manipulation. Neurology 34:684–685CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Morandi X, Riffaud L, Houedakor J, Amlashi SF, Brassier G et al (2004) Caudal spinal cord ischemia after lumbar vertebral manipulation. Jt Bone Spine 71:334–337CrossRef Morandi X, Riffaud L, Houedakor J, Amlashi SF, Brassier G et al (2004) Caudal spinal cord ischemia after lumbar vertebral manipulation. Jt Bone Spine 71:334–337CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tamburrelli FC, Genitiempo M, Logroscino CA (2011) Cauda equina syndrome and spine manipulation: case report and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S128–S131CrossRefPubMed Tamburrelli FC, Genitiempo M, Logroscino CA (2011) Cauda equina syndrome and spine manipulation: case report and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S128–S131CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Oppenheim JS, Spitzer DE, Segal DH (2005) Nonvascular complications following spinal manipulation. Spine J 5:660–667CrossRefPubMed Oppenheim JS, Spitzer DE, Segal DH (2005) Nonvascular complications following spinal manipulation. Spine J 5:660–667CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter DJ (2004) Incorporating Bayesian ideas into health-care evaluation. Stat Sci 19:156–174CrossRef Spiegelhalter DJ (2004) Incorporating Bayesian ideas into health-care evaluation. Stat Sci 19:156–174CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR (1999) Methods in health service research. An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment. BMJ 319:508–512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR (1999) Methods in health service research. An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment. BMJ 319:508–512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
go back to reference O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH et al (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts’ probabilities. Wiley, West SussexCrossRef O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH et al (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts’ probabilities. Wiley, West SussexCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dunson DB (2001) Commentary: practical advantages of Bayesian analysis of epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol 153:1222–1226CrossRefPubMed Dunson DB (2001) Commentary: practical advantages of Bayesian analysis of epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol 153:1222–1226CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hampson LV, Whitehead J, Eleftheriou D, Brogan P (2014) Bayesian methods for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in very rare diseases. Stat Med 33:4186–4201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hampson LV, Whitehead J, Eleftheriou D, Brogan P (2014) Bayesian methods for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in very rare diseases. Stat Med 33:4186–4201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Johnson SR, Tomlinson GA, Hawker GA, Granton JT, Feldman BM (2010) Methods to elicit beliefs for Bayesian priors: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 63:355–369CrossRefPubMed Johnson SR, Tomlinson GA, Hawker GA, Granton JT, Feldman BM (2010) Methods to elicit beliefs for Bayesian priors: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 63:355–369CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Johnson SR, Tomlinson GA, Hawker GA, Granton JT, Grosbein HA et al (2010) A valid and reliable belief elicitation method for Bayesian priors. J Clin Epidemiol 63:370–383CrossRefPubMed Johnson SR, Tomlinson GA, Hawker GA, Granton JT, Grosbein HA et al (2010) A valid and reliable belief elicitation method for Bayesian priors. J Clin Epidemiol 63:370–383CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Johnson SR, Granton JT, Tomlinson GA, Grosbein HA, Hawker GA et al (2011) Effect of warfarin on survival in scleroderma-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) and idiopathic PAH. Belief elicitation for Bayesian priors. J Rheumatol 38:462–469CrossRefPubMed Johnson SR, Granton JT, Tomlinson GA, Grosbein HA, Hawker GA et al (2011) Effect of warfarin on survival in scleroderma-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) and idiopathic PAH. Belief elicitation for Bayesian priors. J Rheumatol 38:462–469CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Tomlinson GA, Pencharz PB et al (2014) Expert beliefs regarding novel lipid-based approaches to pediatric intestinal failure–associated liver disease. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 38:702–710CrossRef Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Tomlinson GA, Pencharz PB et al (2014) Expert beliefs regarding novel lipid-based approaches to pediatric intestinal failure–associated liver disease. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 38:702–710CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hincapié CA (2015) Chiropractic care and risk for acute lumbar disc herniation: a mixed methods approach. Dissertation, University of Toronto Hincapié CA (2015) Chiropractic care and risk for acute lumbar disc herniation: a mixed methods approach. Dissertation, University of Toronto
28.
29.
30.
go back to reference Billingham L, Malottki K, Steven N (2012) Small sample sizes in clinical trials: a statistician’s perspective. Clin Investig 2:655–657CrossRef Billingham L, Malottki K, Steven N (2012) Small sample sizes in clinical trials: a statistician’s perspective. Clin Investig 2:655–657CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Chaloner K, Rhame FS (2001) Quantifying and documenting prior beliefs in clinical trials. Stat Med 20:581–600CrossRefPubMed Chaloner K, Rhame FS (2001) Quantifying and documenting prior beliefs in clinical trials. Stat Med 20:581–600CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Deandrea S, Negri E, Ruggeri F (2014) Integrating clinicians’ opinion in the Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies: the case of risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health (Online) 11:e8909 Deandrea S, Negri E, Ruggeri F (2014) Integrating clinicians’ opinion in the Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies: the case of risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health (Online) 11:e8909
33.
go back to reference Morris DE, Oakley JE, Crowe JA (2014) A web-based tool for eliciting probability distributions from experts. Environ Model Softw 52:1–4CrossRef Morris DE, Oakley JE, Crowe JA (2014) A web-based tool for eliciting probability distributions from experts. Environ Model Softw 52:1–4CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Myburgh C, Mouton J (2008) The development of contemporary chiropractic education in Denmark: an exploratory study. J Manip Physiol Ther 31:583–592CrossRef Myburgh C, Mouton J (2008) The development of contemporary chiropractic education in Denmark: an exploratory study. J Manip Physiol Ther 31:583–592CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Humphreys BK, Peterson CK, Muehlemann D, Haueter P (2010) Are Swiss chiropractors different than other chiropractors? Results of the job analysis survey 2009. J Manip Physiol Ther 33:519–535CrossRef Humphreys BK, Peterson CK, Muehlemann D, Haueter P (2010) Are Swiss chiropractors different than other chiropractors? Results of the job analysis survey 2009. J Manip Physiol Ther 33:519–535CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chenot JF, Becker A, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Donner-Banzhoff N et al (2007) Use of complementary alternative medicine for low back pain consulting in general practice: a cohort study. BMC Complement Altern Med 7:42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chenot JF, Becker A, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Donner-Banzhoff N et al (2007) Use of complementary alternative medicine for low back pain consulting in general practice: a cohort study. BMC Complement Altern Med 7:42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Booth MS, Beroes JM, Mardian AS et al (2017) Association of spinal manipulative therapy with clinical benefit and harm for acute low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 317:1451–1460CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Booth MS, Beroes JM, Mardian AS et al (2017) Association of spinal manipulative therapy with clinical benefit and harm for acute low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 317:1451–1460CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Metadata
Title
Chiropractic spinal manipulation and the risk for acute lumbar disc herniation: a belief elicitation study
Authors
Cesar A. Hincapié
J. David Cassidy
Pierre Côté
Y. Raja Rampersaud
Alejandro R. Jadad
George A. Tomlinson
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5295-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

European Spine Journal 7/2018 Go to the issue

Announcements

ANNOUNCEMENTS