Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2014

01-12-2014 | Pancreatic Tumors

Chen’s U-Suture Technique for End-to-End Invaginated Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors: Xiao-ping Chen, MD, FACS, FASA (hoc), Zhi-yong Huang, MD, Josef W. Y. Lau, MD, Bi-xiang Zhang, MD, Zhi-wei Zhang, MD, Yi-fa Chen, MD, Wan-guang Zhang, MD, Peng Zhu, MD, Binhao Zhang, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Internationally, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In order to reduce the incidence of POPF, a number of technical modifications for pancreato-enteric anastomosis after PD have been proposed. In 1995, we established a new technique with transpancreatic transverse U-sutures for end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy after a PD, and the preliminary results were quite encouraging. This study aims to review a new surgical approach, the Chen’s U-stitch technique, for end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy, which involves two to four transpancreatic transverse U-sutures, and to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach with reducing the incidence of POPF formation.

Methods

To evaluate this new approach, during 2002–2012, a total of 264 patients who received the new Chen’s U-stitch technique after a PD were included in this study. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, including the incidence of POPF, were analyzed.

Results

Postoperative morbidity was 22.3 % (59/264) and mortality was 0 % (0/264). The POPF rate was 3.4 % (9/264) for Grade A, 0.8 % (2/264) for Grade B, and 0 % (0/264) for Grade C.

Conclusions

This new surgical technique (Chen’s U-stitch), which involves an end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy with two to four transpancreatic transverse U-sutures, provides excellent outcomes at reducing the incidence of POPF after PD.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: time to change our approach? Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:573–5.PubMedCrossRef Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: time to change our approach? Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:573–5.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:655–62.PubMedCrossRef Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:655–62.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Heeger K, Fendrich V, Waldmann J, Langer P, Kanngießer V, Bartsch DK. Reduced complication rate after modified binding purse-string-mattress sutures pancreatogastrostomy versus duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. Surgeon. 2013;11:246–52.PubMedCrossRef Heeger K, Fendrich V, Waldmann J, Langer P, Kanngießer V, Bartsch DK. Reduced complication rate after modified binding purse-string-mattress sutures pancreatogastrostomy versus duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. Surgeon. 2013;11:246–52.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Topal B, Aerts R, Hendrickx T, Fieuws S, Penninckx F. Determinants of complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:488–92.PubMedCrossRef Topal B, Aerts R, Hendrickx T, Fieuws S, Penninckx F. Determinants of complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:488–92.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:767–73.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:767–73.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ke S, Ding XM, Gao J, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreatic drainage versus conventional loop reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2013;153:743–52.PubMedCrossRef Ke S, Ding XM, Gao J, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreatic drainage versus conventional loop reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2013;153:743–52.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1117–23.PubMedCrossRef de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1117–23.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fang WL, Shyr YM, Su CH, Chen TH, Wu CW, Lui WY. Comparison between pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106:717–27.PubMedCrossRef Fang WL, Shyr YM, Su CH, Chen TH, Wu CW, Lui WY. Comparison between pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106:717–27.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Govindarajan A, Tan JC, Baxter NN, Coburn NG, Law CH. Variations in surgical treatment and outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:175–85.PubMedCrossRef Govindarajan A, Tan JC, Baxter NN, Coburn NG, Law CH. Variations in surgical treatment and outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:175–85.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Greene BS, Loubeau JM, Peoples JB, Elliott DW. Are pancreatoenteric anastomoses improved by duct-to-mucosa sutures? Am J Surg. 1991;161:45–50.PubMedCrossRef Greene BS, Loubeau JM, Peoples JB, Elliott DW. Are pancreatoenteric anastomoses improved by duct-to-mucosa sutures? Am J Surg. 1991;161:45–50.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hines OJ, Reber HA. Technique of pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:185–9.PubMedCrossRef Hines OJ, Reber HA. Technique of pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:185–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference House MG, Fong Y, Arnaoutakis DJ, et al. Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:270–8.PubMedCrossRef House MG, Fong Y, Arnaoutakis DJ, et al. Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:270–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ibrahim S, Tay KH, Launois B, Ta NC. Triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 2006;23:296–302.PubMedCrossRef Ibrahim S, Tay KH, Launois B, Ta NC. Triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 2006;23:296–302.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Katsaragakis S, Antonakis P, Konstadoulakis MM, Androulakis G. Reconstruction of the pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy : a modification of the Whipple procedure. J Surg Oncol. 2001;77:26–30.PubMedCrossRef Katsaragakis S, Antonakis P, Konstadoulakis MM, Androulakis G. Reconstruction of the pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy : a modification of the Whipple procedure. J Surg Oncol. 2001;77:26–30.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chen XP, Zhang ZW, Zhang BX, Chen YF, Huang ZY. A technique of end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy with double transpancreatic U-sutures after Whipple procedure. Chin J Surg. 2007;45:355–6. Chen XP, Zhang ZW, Zhang BX, Chen YF, Huang ZY. A technique of end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy with double transpancreatic U-sutures after Whipple procedure. Chin J Surg. 2007;45:355–6.
16.
go back to reference Chen XP, Qiu FZ, Zhang ZW, Chen YF, Huang ZY, Zhang WG. A new simple and safe technique of end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy with transpancreatic U-sutures: early postoperative outcomes in consecutive 88 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:739–44.PubMedCrossRef Chen XP, Qiu FZ, Zhang ZW, Chen YF, Huang ZY, Zhang WG. A new simple and safe technique of end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy with transpancreatic U-sutures: early postoperative outcomes in consecutive 88 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:739–44.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oneil Machado N. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management: review. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:1–10. Oneil Machado N. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management: review. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:1–10.
19.
go back to reference Samra JS, Bachmann RA, Choi J, et al. One hundred and seventy-eight consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies without mortality: role of the multidisciplinary approach. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011;10:415–21.PubMedCrossRef Samra JS, Bachmann RA, Choi J, et al. One hundred and seventy-eight consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies without mortality: role of the multidisciplinary approach. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011;10:415–21.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ma JP, Peng L, Qin T, et al. Meta-analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy prospective controlled trials: pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction. Chin Med J. 2012;125(21):3891–7.PubMed Ma JP, Peng L, Qin T, et al. Meta-analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy prospective controlled trials: pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction. Chin Med J. 2012;125(21):3891–7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Peng SY, Wang WW, Lau WY, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Liu YB, et al. Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticduodenectomy a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245:692–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Peng SY, Wang WW, Lau WY, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Liu YB, et al. Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticduodenectomy a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245:692–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mehta VV, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Staley CA, Kooby DA. Is it time to abandon routine operative drain use? A single institution assessment of 709 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:635–44.CrossRef Mehta VV, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Staley CA, Kooby DA. Is it time to abandon routine operative drain use? A single institution assessment of 709 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:635–44.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Chen’s U-Suture Technique for End-to-End Invaginated Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
Xiao-ping Chen, MD, FACS, FASA (hoc)
Zhi-yong Huang, MD
Josef W. Y. Lau, MD
Bi-xiang Zhang, MD
Zhi-wei Zhang, MD
Yi-fa Chen, MD
Wan-guang Zhang, MD
Peng Zhu, MD
Binhao Zhang, MD
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3823-2

Other articles of this Issue 13/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2014 Go to the issue