Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Charlson comorbidity index is predictive of postoperative clinical outcome after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery

Authors: Kensuke Shinonara, Ryo Ugawa, Shinya Arataki, Shinnosuke Nakahara, Kazuhiro Takeuchi

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In several previous studies, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score was associated with postoperative complications, mortality, and re-admission. There are few reports about the influence of CCI score on postoperative clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of comorbidities as calculated with CCI on postoperative clinical outcomes after PLIF.

Methods

Three hundred sixty-six patients who underwent an elective primary single-level PLIF were included. Postoperative clinical outcome was evaluated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association lumbar score (JOA score). The correlation coefficient between the CCI score and postoperative improvement in JOA score was investigated. Patients were divided into three groups according to their CCI score (0, 1, and 2+). JOA improvement rate, length of stay (LOS), and direct cost were compared between each group. Postoperative complications were also investigated.

Results

There was a weak negative relationship between CCI score and JOA improvement rate (r = − 0.20). LOS and direct cost had almost no correlation with CCI score. The JOA improvement rate of group 0 and group 1 was significantly higher than group 2+. LOS and direct cost were also significantly different between group 0 and group 2+. There were 14 postoperative complications. Adverse postoperative complications were equivalently distributed in each group, and not associated with the number of comorbidities.

Conclusions

A higher CCI score leads to a poor postoperative outcome. The recovery rate of patients with two or more comorbidities was significantly higher than in patients without comorbidities. However, the CCI score did not influence LOS and increased direct costs. The surgeon must take into consideration the patient’s comorbidities when planning a surgical intervention in order to achieve a good clinical outcome.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Huang Y, Zhangg Y, Li J. Charlson comorbidity index for evaluation of the outcomes of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. J BUON. 2017;22:686–91.PubMed Huang Y, Zhangg Y, Li J. Charlson comorbidity index for evaluation of the outcomes of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. J BUON. 2017;22:686–91.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Lakomkin N, Zuckerman SL, Stannard B. Preoperative risk stratification in spine tumor surgery. A comparison of the Modified Charlson Index, Frailty Index, and ASA Score. Spine. 2018;44:E782–7.CrossRef Lakomkin N, Zuckerman SL, Stannard B. Preoperative risk stratification in spine tumor surgery. A comparison of the Modified Charlson Index, Frailty Index, and ASA Score. Spine. 2018;44:E782–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Khechen B, Haws BE, Bawa MS. The impact of comorbidity burden on complications, length of stay, and direct hospital costs after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2018;44:363–8.CrossRef Khechen B, Haws BE, Bawa MS. The impact of comorbidity burden on complications, length of stay, and direct hospital costs after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2018;44:363–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Charlson comorbidity index is predictive of postoperative clinical outcome after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery
Authors
Kensuke Shinonara
Ryo Ugawa
Shinya Arataki
Shinnosuke Nakahara
Kazuhiro Takeuchi
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02377-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2021 Go to the issue