Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Community Health 6/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Paper

Characteristics of US Counties with No Mammography Capacity

Authors: Lucy A. Peipins, Jacqueline Miller, Thomas B. Richards, Janet Kay Bobo, Ta Liu, Mary C. White, Djenaba Joseph, Florence Tangka, Donatus U. Ekwueme

Published in: Journal of Community Health | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Access to screening mammography may be limited by the availability of facilities and machines, and nationwide mammography capacity has been declining. We assessed nationwide capacity at state and county levels from 2003 to 2009, the most recent year for which complete data were available. Using mammography facility certification and inspection data from the Food and Drug Administration, we geocoded all mammography facilities in the United States and determined the total number of fully accredited mammography machines in each US County. We categorized mammography capacity as counties with zero capacity (i.e., 0 machines) or counties with capacity (i.e.,≥1 machines), and then compared those two categories by sociodemographic, health care, and geographic characteristics. We found that mammography capacity was not distributed equally across counties within states and that more than 27 % of counties had zero capacity. Although the number of mammography facilities and machines decreased slightly from 2003 to 2009, the percentage of counties with zero capacity changed little. In adjusted analyses, having zero mammography capacity was most strongly associated with low population density (OR = 11.0; 95 % CI 7.7–15.9), low primary care physician density (OR = 8.9; 95 % CI 6.8–11.7), and a low percentage of insured residents (OR = 3.3; 95 % CI 2.5–4.3) when compared with counties having at least one mammography machine. Mammography capacity has been and remains a concern for a portion of the US population—a population that is mostly but not entirely rural.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kalager, M., Zelen, M., Langmark, F., & Adami, H. O. (2010). Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(13), 1203–1210.PubMedCrossRef Kalager, M., Zelen, M., Langmark, F., & Adami, H. O. (2010). Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(13), 1203–1210.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berry, D. A., Cronin, K. A., Plevritis, S. K., Fryback, D. G., Clarke, L., Zelen, M., et al. (2005). Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(17), 1784–1792.PubMedCrossRef Berry, D. A., Cronin, K. A., Plevritis, S. K., Fryback, D. G., Clarke, L., Zelen, M., et al. (2005). Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(17), 1784–1792.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Richardson, L. C., Rim, S. H., & Plescia, M. (2010). Vital Signs: Breast cancer screening among women aged 50–74 years–United States, 2008. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59, 6–9. Richardson, L. C., Rim, S. H., & Plescia, M. (2010). Vital Signs: Breast cancer screening among women aged 50–74 years–United States, 2008. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59, 6–9.
4.
go back to reference Miller, J. W., King, J. B., Ryerson, A. B., Eheman, C. R., & White, M. C. (2009). Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: State-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. American Journal of Roentgenology, 192(2), 352–360.PubMedCrossRef Miller, J. W., King, J. B., Ryerson, A. B., Eheman, C. R., & White, M. C. (2009). Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: State-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. American Journal of Roentgenology, 192(2), 352–360.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ryerson, A. B., Miller, J. W., Eheman, C. R., Leadbetter, S., & White, M. C. (2008). Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000–2006: A population-based analysis. Preventive Medicine, 47(5), 477–482.PubMedCrossRef Ryerson, A. B., Miller, J. W., Eheman, C. R., Leadbetter, S., & White, M. C. (2008). Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000–2006: A population-based analysis. Preventive Medicine, 47(5), 477–482.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sabatino, S. A., Coates, R. J., Uhler, R. J., Breen, N., Tangka, F., & Shaw, K. M. (2005). Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40–64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Medical Care, 46(7), 692–700.CrossRef Sabatino, S. A., Coates, R. J., Uhler, R. J., Breen, N., Tangka, F., & Shaw, K. M. (2005). Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40–64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Medical Care, 46(7), 692–700.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Swan, J., Breen, N., Graubard, B. I., McNeel, T. S., Blackman, D., Tangka, F. K., et al. (2010). Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: Results from the 2005 national health interview survey. Cancer, 116(20), 4872–4881.PubMedCrossRef Swan, J., Breen, N., Graubard, B. I., McNeel, T. S., Blackman, D., Tangka, F. K., et al. (2010). Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: Results from the 2005 national health interview survey. Cancer, 116(20), 4872–4881.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. (2009). Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement, Annals of Internal Medicine 151(10), 716–726, W-236. US Preventive Services Task Force. (2009). Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement, Annals of Internal Medicine 151(10), 716–726, W-236.
9.
go back to reference Smith, R. A., Cokkinides, V., Brooks, D., Saslow, D., & Brawley, O. W. (2010). Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 60(2), 99–119.CrossRef Smith, R. A., Cokkinides, V., Brooks, D., Saslow, D., & Brawley, O. W. (2010). Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 60(2), 99–119.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee, C. H., Dershaw, D. D., Kopans, D., Evans, P., Monsees, B., Monticciolo, D., et al. (2010). Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol, 7(1), 18–27.PubMedCrossRef Lee, C. H., Dershaw, D. D., Kopans, D., Evans, P., Monsees, B., Monticciolo, D., et al. (2010). Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol, 7(1), 18–27.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Doescher, M. P., & Jackson, J. E. (2009). Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 15(3), 200–209.PubMed Doescher, M. P., & Jackson, J. E. (2009). Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 15(3), 200–209.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Engelman, K. K., Hawley, D. B., Gazaway, R., Mosier, M. C., Ahluwalia, J. S., & Ellerbeck, E. F. (2002). Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(1), 62–68.PubMedCrossRef Engelman, K. K., Hawley, D. B., Gazaway, R., Mosier, M. C., Ahluwalia, J. S., & Ellerbeck, E. F. (2002). Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(1), 62–68.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hyndman, J. C., Holman, C. D., & Dawes, V. P. (2000). Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. Journal of Medical Screening, 7(3), 141–145.PubMedCrossRef Hyndman, J. C., Holman, C. D., & Dawes, V. P. (2000). Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. Journal of Medical Screening, 7(3), 141–145.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Larson, S., & Correa-de-Araujo, R. (2006). Preventive health examinations: A comparison along the rural-urban continuum. Womens Health Issues, 16(2), 80–88.PubMedCrossRef Larson, S., & Correa-de-Araujo, R. (2006). Preventive health examinations: A comparison along the rural-urban continuum. Womens Health Issues, 16(2), 80–88.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Meden, T., John-Larkin, C., Hermes, D., & Sommerschield, S. (2002). Relationship between travel distance and utilization of breast cancer treatment in rural northern Michigan. JAMA, 287(1), 111.PubMedCrossRef Meden, T., John-Larkin, C., Hermes, D., & Sommerschield, S. (2002). Relationship between travel distance and utilization of breast cancer treatment in rural northern Michigan. JAMA, 287(1), 111.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127–140.PubMedCrossRef Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127–140.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Unites States Government Accountability Office. (July 2006). Mammography: current nationwide capacity is adequate, but access problems may exist in certain locations, United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC. Unites States Government Accountability Office. (July 2006). Mammography: current nationwide capacity is adequate, but access problems may exist in certain locations, United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
18.
go back to reference Elkin, E. B., Ishill, N. M., Snow, J. G., Panageas, K. S., Bach, P. B., Liberman, L., et al. (2010). Geographic access and the use of screening mammography. Medical Care, 48(4), 349–356.PubMedCrossRef Elkin, E. B., Ishill, N. M., Snow, J. G., Panageas, K. S., Bach, P. B., Liberman, L., et al. (2010). Geographic access and the use of screening mammography. Medical Care, 48(4), 349–356.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Elting, L. S., Cooksley, C. D., Bekele, B. N., Giordano, S. H., Shih, Y. C. T., Lovell, K. K., et al. (2009). Mammography capacity: Impact on screening rates and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(2), 102–108.PubMedCrossRef Elting, L. S., Cooksley, C. D., Bekele, B. N., Giordano, S. H., Shih, Y. C. T., Lovell, K. K., et al. (2009). Mammography capacity: Impact on screening rates and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(2), 102–108.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Center for Devices, Radiological Health. (2007). Mammography program reporting and information system (MPRIS), US Food and Drug Administration. MD: Silver Spring. Center for Devices, Radiological Health. (2007). Mammography program reporting and information system (MPRIS), US Food and Drug Administration. MD: Silver Spring.
21.
go back to reference Meissner, H. I., Klabunde, C. N., Han, P. K., Benard, V. B., & Breen, N. (2011). Breast cancer screening beliefs, recommendations and practices: Primary care physicians in the United States. Cancer, 117(14), 3101–3111.PubMedCrossRef Meissner, H. I., Klabunde, C. N., Han, P. K., Benard, V. B., & Breen, N. (2011). Breast cancer screening beliefs, recommendations and practices: Primary care physicians in the United States. Cancer, 117(14), 3101–3111.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wen, M., Browning, C. R., & Cagney, K. A. (2003). Poverty, affluence, and income inequality: Neighborhood economic structure and its implications for health. Social Science and Medicine, 57(5), 843–860.PubMedCrossRef Wen, M., Browning, C. R., & Cagney, K. A. (2003). Poverty, affluence, and income inequality: Neighborhood economic structure and its implications for health. Social Science and Medicine, 57(5), 843–860.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, E. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, E. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
28.
go back to reference Lynch, J. W., Smith, G. D., Kaplan, G. A., & House, J. S. (2000). Income inequality and mortality: Importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. British Medical Journal, 320, 1200–1204.PubMedCrossRef Lynch, J. W., Smith, G. D., Kaplan, G. A., & House, J. S. (2000). Income inequality and mortality: Importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. British Medical Journal, 320, 1200–1204.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference De Maio, F. G. (2007). Income inequality measures. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 849–852.PubMedCrossRef De Maio, F. G. (2007). Income inequality measures. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 849–852.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Goldman, D. P., & Lakdawalla, D. N. (2005). A theory of health disparities and medical technology. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 4(1), 1–30. Goldman, D. P., & Lakdawalla, D. N. (2005). A theory of health disparities and medical technology. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 4(1), 1–30.
31.
go back to reference Peipins, L., Graham, S., Young, R., Lewis, B., Foster, S., Flanagan, B., et al. (2011). Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Journal of Community Health, 36(4), 675–683.PubMedCrossRef Peipins, L., Graham, S., Young, R., Lewis, B., Foster, S., Flanagan, B., et al. (2011). Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Journal of Community Health, 36(4), 675–683.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tosteson, A. N., Stout, N. K., Fryback, D. G., Acharyya, S., Herman, B. A., Hannah, L. G., et al. (2008). Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(1), 1–10.PubMed Tosteson, A. N., Stout, N. K., Fryback, D. G., Acharyya, S., Herman, B. A., Hannah, L. G., et al. (2008). Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(1), 1–10.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Spelic, D. C., Kaczmarek, R. V., Hilohi, M., & Belella, A. (2007). United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 3(2), 1–16.CrossRef Spelic, D. C., Kaczmarek, R. V., Hilohi, M., & Belella, A. (2007). United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 3(2), 1–16.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mullaney, R., Burbage, D., Evantash, A., Penman, E., Napoletano, J., & Grusenmeyer, P. A. (2007). Making the transition to digital mammography. Community Oncology, 4, 678–680.CrossRef Mullaney, R., Burbage, D., Evantash, A., Penman, E., Napoletano, J., & Grusenmeyer, P. A. (2007). Making the transition to digital mammography. Community Oncology, 4, 678–680.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bennett, K. J., Probst, J. C., & Bellinger, J. D. (2012). Receipt of cancer screening services: Surprising results for some rural minorities. The Journal of Rural Health, 28, 63–72.PubMedCrossRef Bennett, K. J., Probst, J. C., & Bellinger, J. D. (2012). Receipt of cancer screening services: Surprising results for some rural minorities. The Journal of Rural Health, 28, 63–72.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Trivedi, A. N., Rakowski, W., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2008). Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in medicare health plans. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 375–383.PubMedCrossRef Trivedi, A. N., Rakowski, W., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2008). Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in medicare health plans. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 375–383.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Characteristics of US Counties with No Mammography Capacity
Authors
Lucy A. Peipins
Jacqueline Miller
Thomas B. Richards
Janet Kay Bobo
Ta Liu
Mary C. White
Djenaba Joseph
Florence Tangka
Donatus U. Ekwueme
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Community Health / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9562-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Journal of Community Health 6/2012 Go to the issue