Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Characteristics and use of urban health indicator tools by municipal built environment policy and decision-makers: a systematic review protocol

Authors: Helen Pineo, Ketevan Glonti, Harry Rutter, Nicole Zimmermann, Paul Wilkinson, Michael Davies

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is wide agreement that there is a lack of attention to health in municipal environmental policy-making, such as urban planning and regeneration. Explanations for this include differing professional norms between health and urban environment professionals, system complexity and limited evidence for causality between attributes of the built environment and health outcomes. Data from urban health indicator (UHI) tools are potentially a valuable form of evidence for local government policy and decision-makers. Although many UHI tools have been specifically developed to inform policy, there is poor understanding of how they are used. This study aims to identify the nature and characteristics of UHI tools and their use by municipal built environment policy and decision-makers.

Methods

Health and social sciences databases (ASSIA, Campbell Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, Social Policy and Practice and Web of Science Core Collection) will be searched for studies using UHI tools alongside hand-searching of key journals and citation searches of included studies. Advanced searches of practitioner websites and Google will also be used to find grey literature. Search results will be screened for UHI tools, and for studies which report on or evaluate the use of such tools. Data about UHI tools will be extracted to compile a census and taxonomy of existing tools based on their specific characteristics and purpose. In addition, qualitative and quantitative studies about the use of these tools will be appraised using quality appraisal tools produced by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and synthesised in order to gain insight into the perceptions, value and use of UHI tools in the municipal built environment policy and decision-making process. This review is not registered with PROSPERO.

Discussion

This systematic review focuses specifically on UHI tools that assess the physical environment’s impact on health (such as transport, housing, air quality and greenspace). This study will help indicator producers understand whether this form of evidence is of value to built environment policy and decision-makers and how such tools should be tailored for this audience.

Systematic review registration

N/A.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
For example, see the San Francisco Indicator Project developed by the SF Department of Public Health and the City and County of San Francisco (http://​www.​sfindicatorproje​ct.​org/​ accessed 29 Mar 2016) and the Community Indicators Victoria tool developed by McCaughey Centre, VicHealth and the University of Melbourne (http://​www.​communityindicat​ors.​net.​au/​ accessed 17 Feb 2016).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Galea S, Vlahov D. Urban health: evidence, challenges, and directions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:341–65.CrossRefPubMed Galea S, Vlahov D. Urban health: evidence, challenges, and directions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:341–65.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rydin Y, Bleahu A, Davies M, Dávila JD, Friel S, De Grandis G, et al. Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century. Lancet. 2012;379:2079–108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rydin Y, Bleahu A, Davies M, Dávila JD, Friel S, De Grandis G, et al. Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century. Lancet. 2012;379:2079–108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. World Health Organisation. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
4.
go back to reference Barton H. Healthy urban planning: setting the scene. Built Environ. 2005;31:281–7.CrossRef Barton H. Healthy urban planning: setting the scene. Built Environ. 2005;31:281–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Verbeek T, Boelens L. Environmental health in the complex city: a co-evolutionary approach. J Environ Plan Manag. 2016;59(11):1–20. Verbeek T, Boelens L. Environmental health in the complex city: a co-evolutionary approach. J Environ Plan Manag. 2016;59(11):1–20.
6.
go back to reference Sarkar C, Webster C, Gallacher J. UK Biobank Urban Morphometric Platform (UKBUMP)—a nationwide resource for evidence-based healthy city planning and public health interventions. Ann GIS. 2015;21:135–48.CrossRef Sarkar C, Webster C, Gallacher J. UK Biobank Urban Morphometric Platform (UKBUMP)—a nationwide resource for evidence-based healthy city planning and public health interventions. Ann GIS. 2015;21:135–48.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Badland H, Whitzman C, Lowe M, Davern M, Aye L, Butterworth I, et al. Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 2014;111:64–73.CrossRefPubMed Badland H, Whitzman C, Lowe M, Davern M, Aye L, Butterworth I, et al. Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 2014;111:64–73.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bhatia R. Case study: San Francisco’s use of neighborhood indicators to encourage healthy urban development. Health Aff. 2014;33:1914–22.CrossRef Bhatia R. Case study: San Francisco’s use of neighborhood indicators to encourage healthy urban development. Health Aff. 2014;33:1914–22.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lawrence RJ. Urban environmental health indicators: appraisal and policy directives. Rev Environ Health. 2008;23:299–325.CrossRefPubMed Lawrence RJ. Urban environmental health indicators: appraisal and policy directives. Rev Environ Health. 2008;23:299–325.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lowe M, Whitzman C, Badland H, Davern M, Aye L, Hes D, et al. Planning healthy, liveable and sustainable cities: how can indicators inform policy? Urban Policy Res. 2015;33:131–44.CrossRef Lowe M, Whitzman C, Badland H, Davern M, Aye L, Hes D, et al. Planning healthy, liveable and sustainable cities: how can indicators inform policy? Urban Policy Res. 2015;33:131–44.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference McGill E, Egan M, Petticrew M, Mountford L, Milton S, Whitehead M, et al. Trading quality for relevance: non-health decision-makers’ use of evidence on the social determinants of health. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007053.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McGill E, Egan M, Petticrew M, Mountford L, Milton S, Whitehead M, et al. Trading quality for relevance: non-health decision-makers’ use of evidence on the social determinants of health. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007053.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Lorenc T, Tyner EF, Petticrew M, Duffy S, Martineau FP, Phillips G, et al. Cultures of evidence across policy sectors: systematic review of qualitative evidence. Eur J Pub Health. 2014;24:1041–7.CrossRef Lorenc T, Tyner EF, Petticrew M, Duffy S, Martineau FP, Phillips G, et al. Cultures of evidence across policy sectors: systematic review of qualitative evidence. Eur J Pub Health. 2014;24:1041–7.CrossRef
15.
17.
go back to reference Northridge DME, Sclar DED, Biswas MP. Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: a conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. J Urban Health. 2003;80:556–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Northridge DME, Sclar DED, Biswas MP. Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: a conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. J Urban Health. 2003;80:556–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Durand CP, Andalib M, Dunton GF, Wolch J, Pentz MA. A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning. Obes Rev. 2011;12:e173–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Durand CP, Andalib M, Dunton GF, Wolch J, Pentz MA. A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning. Obes Rev. 2011;12:e173–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Innes JE, Booher DE. Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Plann Theory Pract. 2000;1:173–86.CrossRef Innes JE, Booher DE. Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Plann Theory Pract. 2000;1:173–86.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kotval Z. Measuring the effectiveness of downtown revitalization strategies. In: Balsas CJL, editor. Urbanismo Comercial em Portugal: a necessidade de uma nova gestão urbana actas. Lisbon: URBE & CMPV; 2001. p. 43–9. Kotval Z. Measuring the effectiveness of downtown revitalization strategies. In: Balsas CJL, editor. Urbanismo Comercial em Portugal: a necessidade de uma nova gestão urbana actas. Lisbon: URBE & CMPV; 2001. p. 43–9.
22.
go back to reference Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Characteristics and use of urban health indicator tools by municipal built environment policy and decision-makers: a systematic review protocol
Authors
Helen Pineo
Ketevan Glonti
Harry Rutter
Nicole Zimmermann
Paul Wilkinson
Michael Davies
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0406-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue