Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2004

01-06-2004 | Pediatric

Changes in computed tomography features following preoperative chemotherapy for nephroblastoma: relation to histopathological classification

Authors: Øystein E. Olsen, Annmarie C. Jeanes, Neil J. Sebire, Derek J. Roebuck, Anthony J. Michalski, Rupert A. Risdon, Catherine M. Owens

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess computed tomography (CT) changes, both volume estimates and subjective features, following preoperative chemotherapy for nephroblastoma (Wilms’ tumour) in patients treated on the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group Wilms’ Tumour Study-3 (UKW-3) protocol and to compare CT changes and histopathological classification. Twenty-one nephroblastomas in 15 patients treated on UKW-3 were included. All patients were examined by CT before and after preoperative chemotherapy treatment. CT images were reviewed (estimated volume change and subjectively assessed features). CT changes were compared to histopathological classification. Of the 21 tumours, all five high-risk tumours decreased in volume following chemotherapy (median −79%; range −37 to −91%). The sole low-risk tumour decreased in volume by 98%. Ten intermediate-risk tumours decreased in volume (median −72%; range −6 to −98%) and five intermediate-risk tumours increased (median +110%; range +11 to +164%). None of the five high-risk tumours, compared to 15/16 intermediate or low-risk tumours, became less dense and/or more homogeneous, or virtually disappeared, following chemotherapy. Volume change following chemotherapy did not relate to histopathological risk group. Changes in subjectively assessed qualitative CT features were more strongly related to histopathological risk group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cohen MD (2002) The intuition, art, and science of designing tumour imaging protocols: problems and challenges. In: Rosendahl K (ed) 25th Postgraduate Course of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, 2002. Springer, Bergen, Norway, pp 84–88 Cohen MD (2002) The intuition, art, and science of designing tumour imaging protocols: problems and challenges. In: Rosendahl K (ed) 25th Postgraduate Course of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, 2002. Springer, Bergen, Norway, pp 84–88
2.
go back to reference Padhani AR, Husband JE (2000) Commentary. Are current tumour response criteria relevant for the 21st century? Br J Radiol 73:1031–1033 Padhani AR, Husband JE (2000) Commentary. Are current tumour response criteria relevant for the 21st century? Br J Radiol 73:1031–1033
3.
go back to reference Padhani AR, Ollivier L (2001) The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74:983–986PubMed Padhani AR, Ollivier L (2001) The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74:983–986PubMed
4.
go back to reference Vujanic GM, Sandstedt B, Harms D, Kelsey A, Leuschner I, de Kraker J (2002) Revised International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) working classification of renal tumors of childhood. Med Pediatr Oncol 38:79–82PubMed Vujanic GM, Sandstedt B, Harms D, Kelsey A, Leuschner I, de Kraker J (2002) Revised International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) working classification of renal tumors of childhood. Med Pediatr Oncol 38:79–82PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
6.
go back to reference Gow KW, Roberts IF, Jamieson DH, Bray H, Magee JF, Murphy JJ (2000) Local staging of Wilms’ tumor—computerized tomography correlation with histological findings. J Pediatr Surg 35:677–679PubMed Gow KW, Roberts IF, Jamieson DH, Bray H, Magee JF, Murphy JJ (2000) Local staging of Wilms’ tumor—computerized tomography correlation with histological findings. J Pediatr Surg 35:677–679PubMed
7.
go back to reference Thiesse P, Ollivier L, Di Stefano-Louineau D, Negrier S, Savary J, Pignard K et al (1997) Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. Groupe Francais d’Immunotherapie of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:3507–3514PubMed Thiesse P, Ollivier L, Di Stefano-Louineau D, Negrier S, Savary J, Pignard K et al (1997) Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. Groupe Francais d’Immunotherapie of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:3507–3514PubMed
8.
go back to reference McLorie GA, McKenna PH, Greenberg M, Babyn P, Thorner P, Churchill BM et al (1991) Reduction in tumor burden allowing partial nephrectomy following preoperative chemotherapy in biopsy proved Wilms’ tumor. J Urol 146:509–513 McLorie GA, McKenna PH, Greenberg M, Babyn P, Thorner P, Churchill BM et al (1991) Reduction in tumor burden allowing partial nephrectomy following preoperative chemotherapy in biopsy proved Wilms’ tumor. J Urol 146:509–513
9.
go back to reference Ng YY, Hall-Craggs MA, Dicks-Mireaux C, Pritchard J (1991) Wilms’ tumour: pre- and post-chemotherapy CT appearances. Clin Radiol 43:255–259PubMed Ng YY, Hall-Craggs MA, Dicks-Mireaux C, Pritchard J (1991) Wilms’ tumour: pre- and post-chemotherapy CT appearances. Clin Radiol 43:255–259PubMed
Metadata
Title
Changes in computed tomography features following preoperative chemotherapy for nephroblastoma: relation to histopathological classification
Authors
Øystein E. Olsen
Annmarie C. Jeanes
Neil J. Sebire
Derek J. Roebuck
Anthony J. Michalski
Rupert A. Risdon
Catherine M. Owens
Publication date
01-06-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2004
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2217-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2004

European Radiology 6/2004 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Reply