Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2011

Open Access 01-02-2011 | Poster presentation

Change in hypnotic sedative choice over time as a surrogate marker of improved performance

Authors: T Hughes, F Hanks, P Hopkins

Published in: Critical Care | Special Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

Daily sedation holds, particularly when combined with protocolised spontaneous breathing trials, are one of the only strategies available to intensivists that produce an outcome benefit [1]. This evidence has also provoked a renewed interest in the choice of both hypnotic and analgesic agents. Midazolam is known to produce unpredictable awakening and may prolong time to extubation when infusions continue longer than 48 to 72 hours. In contrast, propofol may enhance the benefit to critically ill patients of the daily sedation hold due to its pharmacokinetic properties [2]. This study examines the hypothesis that the ratio of propofol/midazolam use can be used as a surrogate marker of good practice and utilises the potential of the pharmacy procurement database. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Girard TD, et al.: Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care. Lancet 2008, 371: 126-134.CrossRefPubMed Girard TD, et al.: Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care. Lancet 2008, 371: 126-134.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chamorro C, et al.: Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1996, 24: 932-939.CrossRefPubMed Chamorro C, et al.: Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1996, 24: 932-939.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Change in hypnotic sedative choice over time as a surrogate marker of improved performance
Authors
T Hughes
F Hanks
P Hopkins
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue Special Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9777

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2011

Critical Care 1/2011 Go to the issue