Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Cetuximab | Research

Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with a prolonged objective response (≥ 6 months) after first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

Authors: Agathe Vienne, Laetitia Collet, Thomas Chevalier, Christian Borel, Magalie Tardy, Florence Huguet, Sandrine Richard, Sebastien Salas, Esma Saada-Bouzid, Jerome Fayette, Amaury Daste

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC) have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in patients with tumor progression < 6 months following first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), but data are missing for patients with progression ≥ 6 months after the last platinum dose.

Methods

Retrospective analysis (six French centers, 2008–2019) of all consecutive R/M-HNSCC patients. treated first-line with PBC and tumor progression ≥ 6 months after the last platinum dose. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival after second-line therapy (PFS2). Additional endpoints: overall survival from Day 1 of first-line (OS1) and second-line (OS2) therapy.

Results

R/M-HNSCC patients (n = 144) received cisplatinum (n = 67, 47%) or carboplatinum (n = 77, 53%) first-line. Response after first-line: complete response (CR; n = 16, 11%); partial response (PR; n = 77, 53%); stable disease (n = 22, 15%). Second-line therapy: PBC (n = 95, 66%); platinum-free regimen (PFR) (n = 25, 17%); ICI (n = 24, 17%). Median [95% confidence interval] PFS (months): PBC 5.0 [3.8–6.2]; PFR 4.0 [1–7.0]; ICI 2.0 [0.4–3.6] (p = 0.16). For PBC, PFR, and ICI, respectively: OS1 30, 23, and 29 months (p = 1.02); OS2 14, 10, and 16 months (p = 0.25); PR, 26%, 16%, and 21% patients; CR, 0%, 8%, and 4% patients. For subsequent lines, ICIs were administered for PBC (n = 11, 12%) and PFR (n = 2, 8%). No predictive factor for efficacy (PFS, OS) was identified.

Conclusions

Our retrospective study suggests similar efficacy regarding OS2 for second-line chemotherapy or ICI in R/M-HNSCC patients with progression ≥ 6 months after the last first-line platinum dose.
Literature
1.
go back to reference -Pignon JP, le Maître A, Maillard E, Bourhis J. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. RadiotherOncol. 2009;92:4–14. -Pignon JP, le Maître A, Maillard E, Bourhis J. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. RadiotherOncol. 2009;92:4–14.
2.
go back to reference -Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–27.CrossRefPubMed -Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–27.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Guigay J, Auperin A, Fayette J, et al. Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin versus platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:463–75.CrossRefPubMed Guigay J, Auperin A, Fayette J, et al. Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin versus platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:463–75.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference -Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic headandneck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE040): a randomised, openlabel, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393:156–67.CrossRefPubMed -Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic headandneck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE040): a randomised, openlabel, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393:156–67.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference -Ferris RL, Haddad R, Even C, et al. Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):942–50.CrossRefPubMed -Ferris RL, Haddad R, Even C, et al. Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):942–50.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference -Kuczynski EA, Sargent DJ, Grothey A, Kerbel RS. Drug rechallenge and treatment beyond progression implications for drug resistance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:571–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral -Kuczynski EA, Sargent DJ, Grothey A, Kerbel RS. Drug rechallenge and treatment beyond progression implications for drug resistance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:571–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference -Colombo N, Gore M. Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer relapsing 6–12 months post platinum-based chemotherapy. Crit Reviews Oncology/Hematology nov. 2007;64(2):129–38.CrossRef -Colombo N, Gore M. Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer relapsing 6–12 months post platinum-based chemotherapy. Crit Reviews Oncology/Hematology nov. 2007;64(2):129–38.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference -Borel C, Regnier-Gavier O, Carinato H, et al. Interest to consider re-challenging by cetuximab and platinum containing regimen in recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(101):37581–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral -Borel C, Regnier-Gavier O, Carinato H, et al. Interest to consider re-challenging by cetuximab and platinum containing regimen in recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(101):37581–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference -Chevalier T, Daste A, Saada-Bouzid E, et al. Cetuximab combined with paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progressing after EXTREME. Cancer Med. 2021;10(12):3952–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral -Chevalier T, Daste A, Saada-Bouzid E, et al. Cetuximab combined with paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progressing after EXTREME. Cancer Med. 2021;10(12):3952–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference -Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1915–28.CrossRef -Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1915–28.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference -Saleh K, Daste A, Martin N et al. Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer 2021; 123–9. -Saleh K, Daste A, Martin N et al. Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer 2021; 123–9.
13.
go back to reference -Guiard E, Clatot F, Even C, et al. Impact of previous nivolumab treatment on the response to taxanes in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2021;159:125–32.CrossRefPubMed -Guiard E, Clatot F, Even C, et al. Impact of previous nivolumab treatment on the response to taxanes in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2021;159:125–32.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with a prolonged objective response (≥ 6 months) after first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study
Authors
Agathe Vienne
Laetitia Collet
Thomas Chevalier
Christian Borel
Magalie Tardy
Florence Huguet
Sandrine Richard
Sebastien Salas
Esma Saada-Bouzid
Jerome Fayette
Amaury Daste
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11133-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine