Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Targeted Oncology 1/2024

Open Access 29-01-2024 | Cetuximab | Original Research Article

Cetuximab Treatment beyond Progression in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study (THNS-2021-08)

Authors: Hung-Ming Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Muh-Hwa Yang, Tein-Hua Chen, Ming-Yu Lien, Jin-Ching Lin, Jo-Pai Chen, Wei-Chen Lu, Hsueh-Ju Lu, Tai-Lin Huang, Chia-Jui Yen, Shang-Yin Wu, Hui-Ching Wang, Meng-Che Hsieh

Published in: Targeted Oncology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Little is known regarding the association of cetuximab treatment beyond progression (TBP) with survival among patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now considered as first-line treatment, not all patients are suitable for ICIs.

Objective

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the role of cetuximab TBP in patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

Patients with R/M HNSCC who had tumor progression after first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy were included into our study. Oncologic outcomes were estimated including time to cetuximab treatment discontinuation (TTD), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Multivariate cox regression analysis with survival were conducted. Subgroup analysis with P16 and programmed death ligand 1 expression were performed.

Results

A total of 498 patients were eligible with 259 patients in the TBP group and 239 patients in the non-TBP group. The most common first-line chemotherapy was the EXTREME regimen in both groups. As for second-line treatment, the most common regimen were TPEx in the TBP group and taxane-based chemotherapy in the non-TBP group. Median TTD was 8.7 months in TBP and 5.5 months in non-TBP (p < 0.001). In terms of survival, median OS1 was significant longer in the TBP group than in the non-TBP group [14.1 months versus 10.9 months (p = 0.016)]. Multivariate analysis demonstrated cetuximab TBP was a factor independently associated with OS.

Conclusions

Our retrospective study suggests cetuximab TBP to be effective and to provide better survival for patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate the role of cetuximab TBP in R/M HNSCC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miranda-Filho AFB. Global patterns and trends in cancers of the lip, tongue and mouth. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104551.CrossRefPubMed Miranda-Filho AFB. Global patterns and trends in cancers of the lip, tongue and mouth. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104551.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sung HFJ, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.CrossRefPubMed Sung HFJ, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Guigay J, Tahara M, Licitra L, et al. The evolving role of taxanes in combination with cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: evidence, advantages, and future directions. Front oncol. 2019;9:668.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guigay J, Tahara M, Licitra L, et al. The evolving role of taxanes in combination with cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: evidence, advantages, and future directions. Front oncol. 2019;9:668.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
go back to reference Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–27.CrossRefPubMed Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–27.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394:915–1928.CrossRef Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394:915–1928.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ciardiello F, Normanno N, Martinelli E, et al. Cetuximab continuation after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAPRI-GOIM): a randomized phase II trial of FOLFOX plus cetuximab versus FOLFOX. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1055–61.CrossRefPubMed Ciardiello F, Normanno N, Martinelli E, et al. Cetuximab continuation after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAPRI-GOIM): a randomized phase II trial of FOLFOX plus cetuximab versus FOLFOX. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1055–61.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393:156–67.CrossRefPubMed Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393:156–67.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1856–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1856–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression. Oral Oncol. 2018;81:45–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression. Oral Oncol. 2018;81:45–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Grothey A, Sugrue MM, Purdie DM, et al. Bevacizumab beyond first progression is associated with prolonged overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large observational cohort study (BRiTE). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5326–34.CrossRefPubMed Grothey A, Sugrue MM, Purdie DM, et al. Bevacizumab beyond first progression is associated with prolonged overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large observational cohort study (BRiTE). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5326–34.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yamazaki K, Nagase M, Tamagawa H, et al. Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G). Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1539–46.CrossRefPubMed Yamazaki K, Nagase M, Tamagawa H, et al. Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G). Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1539–46.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Aparicio J, Virgili Manrique AC, Capdevila J, et al. Randomized phase II trial of FOLFIRI-panitumumab compared with FOLFIRI alone in patients with RAS wild-type circulating tumor DNA metastatic colorectal cancer beyond progression to first-line FOLFOX-panitumumab: the BEYOND study (GEMCAD 17–01). Clin Transl Oncol. 2022;24:2155–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aparicio J, Virgili Manrique AC, Capdevila J, et al. Randomized phase II trial of FOLFIRI-panitumumab compared with FOLFIRI alone in patients with RAS wild-type circulating tumor DNA metastatic colorectal cancer beyond progression to first-line FOLFOX-panitumumab: the BEYOND study (GEMCAD 17–01). Clin Transl Oncol. 2022;24:2155–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:29–37.CrossRefPubMed Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:29–37.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Petrelli F, Barni S. A pooled analysis of 2618 patients treated with trastuzumab beyond progression for advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13:81–7.CrossRefPubMed Petrelli F, Barni S. A pooled analysis of 2618 patients treated with trastuzumab beyond progression for advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13:81–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jackisch C, Welslau M, Schoenegg W, et al. Impact of trastuzumab treatment beyond disease progression for advanced/metastatic breast cancer on survival—results from a prospective, observational study in Germany. Breast. 2014;23:603–8.CrossRefPubMed Jackisch C, Welslau M, Schoenegg W, et al. Impact of trastuzumab treatment beyond disease progression for advanced/metastatic breast cancer on survival—results from a prospective, observational study in Germany. Breast. 2014;23:603–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hammerman A, Greenberg-Dotan S, Feldhamer I, et al. Second-line treatment of her2-positive metastatic breast cancer: trastuzumab beyond progression or lapatinib? a population based cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0138229.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hammerman A, Greenberg-Dotan S, Feldhamer I, et al. Second-line treatment of her2-positive metastatic breast cancer: trastuzumab beyond progression or lapatinib? a population based cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0138229.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference von Minckwitz G, Schwedler K, Schmidt M, et al. Trastuzumab beyond progression: overall survival analysis of the GBG 26/BIG 3–05 phase III study in HER2-positive breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2273–81.CrossRef von Minckwitz G, Schwedler K, Schmidt M, et al. Trastuzumab beyond progression: overall survival analysis of the GBG 26/BIG 3–05 phase III study in HER2-positive breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2273–81.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lim SW, Park S, Kim Y, et al. Continuation of gefitinib beyond progression in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II single-arm trial. Lung Cancer. 2018;124:293–7.CrossRefPubMed Lim SW, Park S, Kim Y, et al. Continuation of gefitinib beyond progression in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II single-arm trial. Lung Cancer. 2018;124:293–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pignata S, Lorusso D, Joly F, et al. Carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab beyond progression versus carboplatin-based doublet alone in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:267–76.CrossRefPubMed Pignata S, Lorusso D, Joly F, et al. Carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab beyond progression versus carboplatin-based doublet alone in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:267–76.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Li Q, Jiang H, Li H, et al. Efficacy of trastuzumab beyond progression in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Oncotarget. 2016;7:50656–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li Q, Jiang H, Li H, et al. Efficacy of trastuzumab beyond progression in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Oncotarget. 2016;7:50656–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Extra JM, Antoine EC, Vincent-Salomon A, et al. Efficacy of trastuzumab in routine clinical practice and after progression for metastatic breast cancer patients: the observational Hermine study. Oncologist. 2010;15:799–809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Extra JM, Antoine EC, Vincent-Salomon A, et al. Efficacy of trastuzumab in routine clinical practice and after progression for metastatic breast cancer patients: the observational Hermine study. Oncologist. 2010;15:799–809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Cetuximab Treatment beyond Progression in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study (THNS-2021-08)
Authors
Hung-Ming Wang
Pei-Jen Lou
Muh-Hwa Yang
Tein-Hua Chen
Ming-Yu Lien
Jin-Ching Lin
Jo-Pai Chen
Wei-Chen Lu
Hsueh-Ju Lu
Tai-Lin Huang
Chia-Jui Yen
Shang-Yin Wu
Hui-Ching Wang
Meng-Che Hsieh
Publication date
29-01-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Targeted Oncology / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Electronic ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-023-01028-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Targeted Oncology 1/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine