Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Cervical length after cerclage: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approach

Authors: Daniele Bolla, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Sabrina Badir, Michael Bajka, Michael D. Mueller, Andrea Papadia, Luigi Raio

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study was to investigate the sonographic changes of the cervical length during pregnancy after the placement of a transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC) or a laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) in patients with cervical insufficiency (CI).

Methods

Between January 2008 and March 2015, a retrospective analysis of all women undergoing a prophylactic laparoscopic (LAC group) or transvaginal (TVC group) cerclage due to cervical insufficiency was conducted. Nonparametric variables were analysed with the Mann–Whitney (U) test, and categorical-type outcomes were analysed with the Fisher’s exact test. A p value <0.05 was considered as significant. Data analysis was performed using Prism 5 for Mac OS X.

Results

Thirty-eight patients were included. Of these, 18 and 20 underwent an LAC and a TVC, respectively. Mean gestational age at surgery in the LAC and TVC groups was 11.4 ± 1.6 and 17 ± 3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.05). The cervical length prior to surgery was similar among the two groups. After cerclage placement, the distance between the tape and the external cervical os differed significantly between the two groups (LAC: 31.5 ± 8.8 mm vs TVC: 13.5 ± 4.9 mm; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1). During pregnancy, the cervical length in the TVC group showed a significant shortening (from 26.6 ± 7 mm before surgery to 13.2 ± 7 mm at 33 weeks; p < 0.0001), while in the LAC group, the cervical length remained unchanged.

Conclusions

In patients with CI, LAC is associated with a better preservation of the cervical length throughout pregnancy as compared to TVC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Romero R, Espinoza J, Erez O, Hassan S (2006) The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1–9CrossRefPubMed Romero R, Espinoza J, Erez O, Hassan S (2006) The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1–9CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Harger JH (2002) Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol 100:1313–1327PubMed Harger JH (2002) Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol 100:1313–1327PubMed
3.
go back to reference Alfirevic Z, Owen J, Carreras Moratonas E, Sharp AN, Szychowski JM, Goya M (2013) Vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41:146–151CrossRefPubMed Alfirevic Z, Owen J, Carreras Moratonas E, Sharp AN, Szychowski JM, Goya M (2013) Vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41:146–151CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2014) ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 123:372–379.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2014) ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 123:372–379.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bolla D, Raio L, Imboden S, Mueller MD. (2015) Laparoscopic cerclage as a treatment option for cervical insufficiency. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 75:833–838CrossRef Bolla D, Raio L, Imboden S, Mueller MD. (2015) Laparoscopic cerclage as a treatment option for cervical insufficiency. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 75:833–838CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Riiskjaer M, Petersen OB, Uldbjerg N, Hvidman L, Helmig RB, Forman A (2012) Feasibility and clinical effects of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: an observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91:1314–1318CrossRefPubMed Riiskjaer M, Petersen OB, Uldbjerg N, Hvidman L, Helmig RB, Forman A (2012) Feasibility and clinical effects of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: an observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91:1314–1318CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Burger NB, Einarsson JI, Brölmann HA, Vree FE, McElrath TF, Huirne JA (2012) Preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a multicenter cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(273):e1–e12 Burger NB, Einarsson JI, Brölmann HA, Vree FE, McElrath TF, Huirne JA (2012) Preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a multicenter cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(273):e1–e12
9.
go back to reference Burger NB, Brölmann HA, Einarsson JI, Langebrekke A, Huirne JA (2011) Effectiveness of abdominal cerclage placed via laparotomy or laparoscopy: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:696–704CrossRefPubMed Burger NB, Brölmann HA, Einarsson JI, Langebrekke A, Huirne JA (2011) Effectiveness of abdominal cerclage placed via laparotomy or laparoscopy: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:696–704CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Abdel-Aleem MA (2013) Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD007873 Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Abdel-Aleem MA (2013) Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD007873
11.
go back to reference Mazza E, Parra-Saavedra M, Bajka M, Gratacos E, Nicolaides K, Deprest J (2014) In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 34:33–41CrossRefPubMed Mazza E, Parra-Saavedra M, Bajka M, Gratacos E, Nicolaides K, Deprest J (2014) In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 34:33–41CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Badir S, Mazza E, Zimmermann R, Bajka M (2013) Cervical softening occurs early in pregnancy: characterization of cervical stiffness in 100 healthy women using the aspiration technique. Prenat Diagn 33:737–741CrossRefPubMed Badir S, Mazza E, Zimmermann R, Bajka M (2013) Cervical softening occurs early in pregnancy: characterization of cervical stiffness in 100 healthy women using the aspiration technique. Prenat Diagn 33:737–741CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M (2012) Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol 29:7–18CrossRefPubMed Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M (2012) Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol 29:7–18CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Papadia A, Bolla D, Gasparri ML, Raio L (2016) The CORONIS trial on caesarean section. Lancet 388:1373CrossRefPubMed Papadia A, Bolla D, Gasparri ML, Raio L (2016) The CORONIS trial on caesarean section. Lancet 388:1373CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage (2013) Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:516–523CrossRef MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage (2013) Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:516–523CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A (1984) A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:724–730CrossRefPubMed Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A (1984) A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:724–730CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, Renaud R, Pontonnier G, Papiernik E (1984) Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:731–735CrossRefPubMed Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, Renaud R, Pontonnier G, Papiernik E (1984) Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:731–735CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VC et al (2004) Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1849–1853CrossRefPubMed To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VC et al (2004) Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1849–1853CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Saccone G, Rust O, Althuisius S, Roman A, Berghella V (2015) Cerclage for short cervix in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials using individual patient-level data. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94:352–358CrossRefPubMed Saccone G, Rust O, Althuisius S, Roman A, Berghella V (2015) Cerclage for short cervix in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials using individual patient-level data. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94:352–358CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J (2011) Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 117:663–671CrossRefPubMed Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J (2011) Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 117:663–671CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Vousden N, Hezelgrave N, Carter J, Seed PT, Shennan AH (2015) Prior ultrasound-indicated cerclage: how should we manage the next pregnancy? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 188:129–132CrossRefPubMed Vousden N, Hezelgrave N, Carter J, Seed PT, Shennan AH (2015) Prior ultrasound-indicated cerclage: how should we manage the next pregnancy? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 188:129–132CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Suhag A, Reina J, Sanapo L et al (2015) Prior ultrasound-indicated cerclage: comparison of cervical length screening or history-indicated cerclage in the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 126:962–968CrossRefPubMed Suhag A, Reina J, Sanapo L et al (2015) Prior ultrasound-indicated cerclage: comparison of cervical length screening or history-indicated cerclage in the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 126:962–968CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cervical length after cerclage: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approach
Authors
Daniele Bolla
Maria Luisa Gasparri
Sabrina Badir
Michael Bajka
Michael D. Mueller
Andrea Papadia
Luigi Raio
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4285-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2017 Go to the issue