Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Women's Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Cervical Cancer | Research article

Alleviating psychological distress associated with a positive cervical cancer screening result: a randomized control trial

Authors: Yukari Isaka, Ai Hori, Rie Tanaka, Masao Ichikawa

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The method of communicating a positive cancer screening result should seek to alleviate psychological distress associated with a positive result. We evaluated whether the provision of information through a leaflet would help reduce psychological distress in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods

The participants were women aged 20–69 years who were about to undergo cervical cancer screening at health centers. Before the screening, they received hypothetical screening results, with a leaflet (intervention group, n = 493) or without it (control group, n = 479), randomly. Their psychological distress and intention to undergo further examination were then compared between the intervention and control groups.

Results

After the intervention (providing a leaflet with hypothetical screening results), psychological distress appeared to be higher in the control group than in the intervention group among those who received a hypothetical positive screening result (odds ratio: 2.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.87–3.54), while 95% and 97% of those in the intervention and control groups, respectively, reported that they would undergo further examination.

Conclusions

Information provision might help reduce psychological distress but not hinder further examination among women who screen positive for cervical cancer.
Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000029894. Date of Registration: November 2017.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018. GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–53. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018. GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–53.
2.
go back to reference Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katanoda K, Sobue T, Nishimoto H; Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: a study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45(9):884–91. Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katanoda K, Sobue T, Nishimoto H; Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: a study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45(9):884–91.
5.
go back to reference Hamashima C, Aoki D, Miyagi E, Saito E, Nakayama T, Sagawa M, Saito H, Sobue T; Japanese Research Group for Development of Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines. The Japanese guideline for cervical cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:485–502. Hamashima C, Aoki D, Miyagi E, Saito E, Nakayama T, Sagawa M, Saito H, Sobue T; Japanese Research Group for Development of Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines. The Japanese guideline for cervical cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:485–502.
6.
go back to reference Isaka Y, Inada H, Hiranuma Y, Ichikawa M. Psychological impact of positive cervical cancer screening results among Japanese women. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017;22(1):102–6.CrossRef Isaka Y, Inada H, Hiranuma Y, Ichikawa M. Psychological impact of positive cervical cancer screening results among Japanese women. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017;22(1):102–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gray NM, Sharp L, Cotton SC, Masson LF, Little J, Walker LG, Avis M, Philips Z, Russell I, Whynes D, Cruickshank M, Woolley CM; TOMBOLA Group. Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: anxiety and associated factors. Br J Cancer. 2006:94:1253–62. Gray NM, Sharp L, Cotton SC, Masson LF, Little J, Walker LG, Avis M, Philips Z, Russell I, Whynes D, Cruickshank M, Woolley CM; TOMBOLA Group. Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: anxiety and associated factors. Br J Cancer. 2006:94:1253–62.
9.
go back to reference Hellsten C, Sjostrom K, Lindqvist PG. A 2-year follow-up study of anxiety and depression in women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear. BJOG. 2008;115:212–8.CrossRef Hellsten C, Sjostrom K, Lindqvist PG. A 2-year follow-up study of anxiety and depression in women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear. BJOG. 2008;115:212–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Idestrom M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellstrom A. Women’s experience of coping with a positive Pap smear: a register-based study of women with two consecutive Pap smears reported as CIN 1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:756–61.PubMed Idestrom M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellstrom A. Women’s experience of coping with a positive Pap smear: a register-based study of women with two consecutive Pap smears reported as CIN 1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:756–61.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Korfage IJ, Van Ballegooijen M, Huveneers H, Essink-Bot ML. Anxiety and borderline PAP smear results. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:134–41.CrossRef Korfage IJ, Van Ballegooijen M, Huveneers H, Essink-Bot ML. Anxiety and borderline PAP smear results. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:134–41.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lerman C, Miller SM, Scarborough R, Hanjani P, Nolte S, Smith D. Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:658–62.CrossRef Lerman C, Miller SM, Scarborough R, Hanjani P, Nolte S, Smith D. Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:658–62.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wilkinson C, Jones JM, McBride J. Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial. BMJ. 1990;300:440.CrossRef Wilkinson C, Jones JM, McBride J. Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial. BMJ. 1990;300:440.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Goldsmith MR, Bankhead CR, Austoker J. Synthesizing quantitative and qualitative research in evidence-based patient information. J Epidemiological Community Health. 2007;61(3):262–70.CrossRef Goldsmith MR, Bankhead CR, Austoker J. Synthesizing quantitative and qualitative research in evidence-based patient information. J Epidemiological Community Health. 2007;61(3):262–70.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hirai K, Harada K, Seki A, Nagatsuka M, Arai H, Hazama A, Ishikawa Y, Hamashima C, Saito H, Shibuya D. Structural equation modeling for implementation intentions, cancer worry, and stages of mammography adoption. Psycho-oncology. 2013;22(10):2339–46.CrossRef Hirai K, Harada K, Seki A, Nagatsuka M, Arai H, Hazama A, Ishikawa Y, Hamashima C, Saito H, Shibuya D. Structural equation modeling for implementation intentions, cancer worry, and stages of mammography adoption. Psycho-oncology. 2013;22(10):2339–46.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS. The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psycho-oncology. 2005;14(7):517–34.CrossRef Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS. The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psycho-oncology. 2005;14(7):517–34.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:726–32.CrossRef Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:726–32.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS Consensus Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i5239. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS Consensus Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i5239.
20.
go back to reference Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2114–9.CrossRef Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2114–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Seki A, Hirai K, Nagatsuka M, Harada K, Arai K, Hazama A, Ishikawa Y, Hamashima C, Saito H, Shibuya D. Measurement of the attitude for breast cancer screening (in Japanese). Kousei-No-Shihyo. 2011;58(2):14–22. Seki A, Hirai K, Nagatsuka M, Harada K, Arai K, Hazama A, Ishikawa Y, Hamashima C, Saito H, Shibuya D. Measurement of the attitude for breast cancer screening (in Japanese). Kousei-No-Shihyo. 2011;58(2):14–22.
22.
go back to reference Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Jepson C, Brody D, Boyce A. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol. 1991;10:259–67.CrossRef Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Jepson C, Brody D, Boyce A. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol. 1991;10:259–67.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sakurai K, Nishi A, Kondo K, Yanagida K, Kawakami N. Screening performance of K6/K10 and other screening instruments for mood and anxiety disorders in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;65:434–41.CrossRef Sakurai K, Nishi A, Kondo K, Yanagida K, Kawakami N. Screening performance of K6/K10 and other screening instruments for mood and anxiety disorders in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;65:434–41.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kessler RC, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Bromet E, Cuitan M, Furukawa TA, Gureje O, Hinkov H, Hu CY, Lara C, Lee S, Mneimneh Z, Myer L, Oakley-Browne M, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Viana MC, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010;19(Suppl 1):4–22.CrossRef Kessler RC, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Bromet E, Cuitan M, Furukawa TA, Gureje O, Hinkov H, Hu CY, Lara C, Lee S, Mneimneh Z, Myer L, Oakley-Browne M, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Viana MC, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010;19(Suppl 1):4–22.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Togari T, Yamazaki Y, Koide S, Miyata A. Reliability and validity of the modified Perceived Health Competence Scale (PHCS) Japanese version. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2006;53(1):51–7.PubMed Togari T, Yamazaki Y, Koide S, Miyata A. Reliability and validity of the modified Perceived Health Competence Scale (PHCS) Japanese version. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2006;53(1):51–7.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Smith MS, Wallston KA, Smith CA. The development and validation of the Perceived Health Competence Scale. Health Educ Res. 1995;10:51–64.CrossRef Smith MS, Wallston KA, Smith CA. The development and validation of the Perceived Health Competence Scale. Health Educ Res. 1995;10:51–64.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Karasz A, McKee M, Roybal K. Women’s experiences of abnormal cervical cytology: illness representations, care processes, and outcomes. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(4):196–202.CrossRef Karasz A, McKee M, Roybal K. Women’s experiences of abnormal cervical cytology: illness representations, care processes, and outcomes. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(4):196–202.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Forss A, Tishelman C, Widmark C. Women’s experiences of cervical cellular changes: an unintentional transition from health to liminality? Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26(3):306–25.CrossRef Forss A, Tishelman C, Widmark C. Women’s experiences of cervical cellular changes: an unintentional transition from health to liminality? Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26(3):306–25.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Alleviating psychological distress associated with a positive cervical cancer screening result: a randomized control trial
Authors
Yukari Isaka
Ai Hori
Rie Tanaka
Masao Ichikawa
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01207-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Women's Health 1/2021 Go to the issue