Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Cervical Cancer | Research

Socioeconomic inequalities in women’s access to health care: has Ecuadorian health reform been successful?

Authors: Edy Quizhpe, Miguel San Sebastian, Enrique Teran, Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Over the last 12 years, Ecuador has implemented comprehensive health sector reform to ensure equitable access to health care services according to need. While there have been important achievements in terms of health care coverage, the effects of these reforms on socioeconomic inequalities in health care have not been analysed. The present study assesses whether the health care reforms implemented in the decade between 2007 and 2017 have contributed to reducing the socioeconomic inequalities in women’s health care access.

Methods

The present study was based on two waves (2006 and 2014) of the Living Standards Measurement Survey conducted in Ecuador. Data from women of reproductive age (15 to 49 years) were analysed to evaluate health care coverage across three indicators: skilled birth attendance, cervical cancer screening, and the use of modern contraceptives. Absolute risk differences were calculated between the heath care indicators and the socioeconomic variables using binomial regression analysis for each time period. The Slope Index of Inequality (SII) was also calculated for each socioeconomic variable and period. A multiplicative interaction term between the socioeconomic variables and period was included to assess the changes in socioeconomic inequalities in health care over time.

Results

Access to health care increased in the three studied outcomes during the health sector reform. Significant reductions in inequality in skilled birth attendance were observed in all socioeconomic variables except in the occupational class. Cervical cancer screening inequalities increased according to education and occupation, but decreased by wealth. Only a poorer education was observed for modern contraceptive use.

Conclusions

While most socioeconomic inequalities in skilled birth attendance decreased during the reform period, this was not the case for inequalities in cervical cancer screening or the use of modern contraceptives. Further studies are needed to address the social determinants of these health inequalities.
Literature
1.
World Health Organization. Handbook on health inequality monitoring: with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries. Geneve: WHO; 2013.
2.
3.
World Health Organization. CSDH, closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneve: WHO; 2008.
4.
Atun R, de Andrade L, Almeida G, Cotlear D. Dmytraczenko et al. health-system reform and universal health coverage in Latin America. Lancet. 2015;385(9974):1230–47.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Dmytraczenko T, Almeida G. Toward universal health coverage and equity in Latin America and the Caribbean. New York: World Bank and World Health Organization; 2015.
6.
Cecchini S, Madariaga A. Conditional cash transfer programmes: the recent experience in Latin America and the Caribbean. New York: United Nations; 2011.
7.
Barreto ML, Rasella D, Machado DB, Aquino R, Lima D, et al. Monitoring and evaluating progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001692.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Horton R, Das P. Universal health coverage: not why, what, or when—but how? Lancet. 2015;385:1156–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Atun R, de Andrade LO, Almeida G, Cotlear D, Dmytraczenko T, Frenz P, Garcia P, Gómez-Dantés O, Knaul FM, Muntaner C, de Paula JB, Rígoli F, Serrate PC, Wagstaff A. Health-system reform and universal health coverage in Latin America. Lancet. 2015;385(9974):1230–47.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Wagstaff A, Dmytraczenko T, Almeida G, Buisman L. Assessing Latin America’s progress toward achieving universal health coverage. Health Aff. 2015;34:10.CrossRef
11.
Esteves RJ. The quest for equity in Latin America: a comparative analysis of the health care reforms in Brazil and Colombia. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11:6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Giovanella L, Mendoza-Ruiz A. de Carvalho Amand Pilar a, Cantanhede da Rosa M, Branco martins G, Soares Santos I, et al. universal health system and universal health coverage: assumptions and strategies. Cien Saude Colet. 2018;23(6):1763–76.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Frenk J, Gomez-Dantes O. Health systems in Latin America: the search for universal health coverage. Arch Med Res. 2018;49:79e83.CrossRef
14.
15.
Asamblea Constituyente. Constitución de la República del Ecuador; 2008.
16.
17.
18.
De Paepe P, Echeverría Tapia R, Aguilar SE. Ecuador's silent health reform. Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(2):219–33.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Iturralde P. Privatización de la salud en Ecuador Estudio de la interacción pública con clínicas y hospitales privados. Centro de Derechos Económicos y Sociales – CDES: Quito; 2015.
21.
Friederic K, Burke B. La “revolución ciudadana” and social medicine: undermining community in the state provision of health care in Ecuador. Glob Public Health. 2019;14:884–98.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Malo M, Malo N. Reforma de salud en Ecuador: nunca más el derecho a la salud como un privilegio. Rev Peru De Med Exp Salud Publica. 2014;31(4):754–61.
23.
Granda M, Jimenez W. The evolution of socioeconomic health inequalities in Ecuador during a public health system reform (2006–2014). Int J Equity Health. 2019;18:31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Boerma T, Eozenou P, Evans D, Evans T, Kieny M-P, et al. Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001731.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
26.
27.
Organización Mundial de la Salud y Banco Mundial. Monitoreo del progreso hacia la cobertura universal de salud a nivel nacional y global. Marco de trabajo, medidas y metas. Geneve: OMS, BM; 2014.
28.
29.
INEC: Manual de usuario CIUO 08-Clasificación Internacional de Ocupaciones 2008; 2010.
30.
31.
32.
Lucio R, Villacrés N, Henríquez R. Sistema de salud de Ecuador [the health system of Ecuador]. Salud Publica Mex. 2011;53(2):177–87.
33.
Ministerio de Salud Pública. Guía Técnica para la atención del parto culturalmente adecuado. Quito: MSP; 2008.
34.
Gallegos C, Watersb W, Sebert KA. Discourse versus practice: are traditional practices and beliefs in pregnancy and childbirth included or excluded in the Ecuadorian health care system? Int Health. 2017;9:105–11.PubMed
35.
Llamas A, Mayhew S. “Five hundred years of medicine gone to waste”? Negotiating the implementation of an intercultural health policy in the Ecuadorian Andes. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:686.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Waters W, Ehlers J, Ortega F, Sebert KA. Physically demanding labor and health among indigenous women in the Ecuadorian highlands. J Community Health. 2018;43:220–6.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Bustamante G, Mantilla B, Cabrera-Barona P, Barragan E, Soria S, et al. Awareness of obstetric warning signs in Ecuador: a cross-sectional study. Public Health. 2019;172:52–60.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Byrne A, Morgan A. How the integration of traditional birth attendants with formal health systems can increase skilled birth attendance? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115:127–34.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Martinez C. Discriminación y colonialidad en el Ecuador de Rafael Correa (2007–2017). Alteridades. 2018;28(55):49–60.CrossRef
40.
Lalander R, Ospina P. The indigenous movement and citizen revolution in Ecuador. Cuestiones Políticas. 2012;28:13–50.
41.
Ministerio de Salud Pública. Articulación de prácticas y saberes de las parteras ancestrales en el Sistema Nacional de Salud, Manual. Quito: MSP; 2016.
42.
43.
Goldberg D. Social justice, health inequalities and methodological individualism in US health promotion. Public Health Ethics. 2012;5(2):111–2.CrossRef
44.
Agurto I, Bishop A, Sanchez G, Betancourt Z, Robles S. Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America. Prev Med. 2004;39:91–8.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Luffy S, Evans D, Rochat R. “Siempre me critican”: barriers to reproductive health in Ocotal, Nicaragua. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015;37(4/5):245–50.PubMed
46.
Soneji S, Fukui N. Socioeconomic determinants of cervical cancer screening in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33(3):174–82.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Murillo R, Almonte M, Pereira A, Ferrer E, Gamboa O. José Jerónimo, Lazcano-Ponce E. cervical cancer screening programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Vaccine. 2008;26(Suppl 11):37–48.CrossRef
48.
Bermedo-Carrasco S, Peña-Sanchez J, Lepnurm R, Szafron M, Waldner C. Inequities in cervical cancer screening among Colombian women: a multilevel analysis of a nationwide survey. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39:229–36.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Abiodun OA, Olu-Abiodun OO, Sotunsa JO, Oluwole FA. Impact of health education intervention on knowledge and perception of cervical cancer and cervical screening uptake among adult women in rural communities in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:814.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Islam R, Billah B, Hossain N, Oldroyd J. Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(7):1751–63.PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Castillo R. Ethnic disparities in the reproductive and sexual health screening practices of Ecuadorian women. MsC thesis. University of Texas. Open Access Theses & Dissertations; 2015.
52.
Ministerio de Salud Pública. Estrategia nacional para la atención integral del cáncer en el Ecuador. Quito: MSP; 2017.
53.
Pan American Health Organization. Health situation in the Americas: Core indicators. Washington: PAHO; 2016.
54.
Ministerio de Salud Pública. Reglamento para regular el acceso de métodos anticonceptivos. Quito: MSP; 2013.
55.
Arnold J, Flint J, Casapulla S, Nieto C, Grijalva M. Medical pluralism in maternal health-seeking behavior of rural women in southern Ecuador. Health Care Women Int. 2019;6:1–18.CrossRef
56.
Wurtz H. Indigenous women of Latin America: unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion, and reproductive health outcomes. Pimatisiwin. 2012;10(3):271–82.PubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Westgard C, Ally Rogers A, Bello G, Rivadeneira N. Health service utilization, perspectives, and health-seeking behavior for maternal and child health services in the Amazon of Peru, a mixed-methods study. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):155.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Dansereau E, Schaefer A, Hernandez B, Nelson J, Palmisano E, et al. Perceptions of and barriers to family planning services in the poorest regions of Chiapas, Mexico: a qualitative study of men, women, and adolescents. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):129.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
Goicolea I. Exploring women's needs in an Amazon region of Ecuador. Reprod Health Matters. 2001;9(17):193–202.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Feld H, Rojas V, Linares AM. “We keep quiet”: exploring the context of pregnancy intention in a low-resource community in Ecuador. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27(1):1686198.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Socioeconomic inequalities in women’s access to health care: has Ecuadorian health reform been successful?
Authors
Edy Quizhpe
Miguel San Sebastian
Enrique Teran
Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01294-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research

Vulnerability in health and social capital: a qualitative analysis by levels of marginalization in Mexico

Research

A nationwide cross-sectional study of 15,611 lesbian, gay and bisexual people in China: disclosure of sexual orientation and experiences of negative treatment in health care

Research

A distributional regression approach to income-related inequality of health in Australia

Research

Comprehensive primary health care and non-communicable diseases management: a case study of El Salvador

Research

Inequitable access to an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy service: linked cross-sectional study

Research

Income-related inequalities in unmet dental care needs in Spain: traces left by the Great Recession