Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Study protocol

Cervical cancer screening and adherence to follow-up among Hispanic women study protocol: a randomized controlled trial to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women

Authors: Catherine Duggan, Gloria Coronado, Javiera Martinez, Theresa L Byrd, Elizabeth Carosso, Cathy Lopez, Maria Benavides, Beti Thompson

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the US, Hispanic women have a higher incidence of, and mortality from, cervical cancer than non-Hispanic white women. The reason for this disparity may be attributable to both low rates of screening and poor adherence to recommended diagnostic follow-up after an abnormal Pap test. The 'Cervical Cancer Screening and Adherence to Follow-up Among Hispanic Women' study is a collaboration between a research institution and community partners made up of members from community based organizations, the Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic and the Breast, Cervical, and Colon Health Program of the Yakima District . The study will assess the efficacy of two culturally-appropriate, tailored educational programs designed to increase cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women, based in the Yakima Valley, Washington, US.

Methods/design

A parallel randomized-controlled trial of 600 Hispanic women aged 21–64, who are non-compliant with Papanicolau (Pap) test screening guidelines. Participants will be randomized using block randomization to (1) a control arm (usual care); (2) a low-intensity information program, consisting of a Spanish-language video that educates women on the importance of cervical cancer screening; or (3) a high-intensity program consisting of the video plus a ‘promotora’ or lay-community health educator-led, home based intervention to encourage cervical cancer screening. Participants who attend cervical cancer screening, and receive a diagnosis of an abnormal Pap test will be assigned to a patient navigator who will provide support and information to promote adherence to follow-up tests, and any necessary surgery or treatment. Primary endpoint: Participants will be tracked via medical record review at community-based clinics, to identify women who have had a Pap test within 7 months of baseline assessment. Medical record reviewers will be blinded to randomization arm. Secondary endpoint: An evaluation of the patient navigator program as a method to improve adherence and reduce time to follow-up among participants who receive an abnormal Pap test result. An additional secondary endpoint is the cost-effectiveness of the two different intensity intervention programs.

Discussion

This culturally sensitive intervention aims to increase compliance and adherence to cervical screening in a Hispanic population. If effective, such interventions may reduce incidence of cervical cancer.

Trial registration

NCT01525433
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Working Group: The Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. Br Med J. 1986, 293 (6548): 659-664.CrossRef International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Working Group: The Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. Br Med J. 1986, 293 (6548): 659-664.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E: Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Br J Cancer. 1996, 73 (8): 1001-1005. 10.1038/bjc.1996.196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E: Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Br J Cancer. 1996, 73 (8): 1001-1005. 10.1038/bjc.1996.196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services: US Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for Cervical Cancer. Recommendations and Rationale. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2003, AHRQ Publication, Washington DC, No. 03-515A US Department of Health and Human Services: US Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for Cervical Cancer. Recommendations and Rationale. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2003, AHRQ Publication, Washington DC, No. 03-515A
4.
go back to reference SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations). Edited by: Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA. 2012, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/, based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations). Edited by: Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA. 2012, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, http://​seer.​cancer.​gov/​csr/​1975_​2009_​pops09/​, based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site
5.
go back to reference American Cancer Society: Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2009. 2009, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, i-64. American Cancer Society: Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2009. 2009, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, i-64.
6.
go back to reference Engelstad LP, Stewart SL, Nguyen BH, Bedeian KL, Rubin MM, Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA: Abnormal Pap smear follow-up in a high-risk population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001, 10 (10): 1015-1020.PubMed Engelstad LP, Stewart SL, Nguyen BH, Bedeian KL, Rubin MM, Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA: Abnormal Pap smear follow-up in a high-risk population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001, 10 (10): 1015-1020.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Jones HW: Clinical treatment of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance cervical cytology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 43 (2): 381-393. 10.1097/00003081-200006000-00017.CrossRefPubMed Jones HW: Clinical treatment of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance cervical cytology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 43 (2): 381-393. 10.1097/00003081-200006000-00017.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bazargan M, Bazargan SH, Farooq M, Baker RS: Correlates of cervical cancer screening among underserved Hispanic and African-American women. Prev Med. 2004, 39 (3): 465-473. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.003.CrossRefPubMed Bazargan M, Bazargan SH, Farooq M, Baker RS: Correlates of cervical cancer screening among underserved Hispanic and African-American women. Prev Med. 2004, 39 (3): 465-473. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.003.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN: Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the Health Belief Model. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008, 12 (3): 232-241. 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31815d8d88.CrossRefPubMed Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN: Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the Health Belief Model. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008, 12 (3): 232-241. 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31815d8d88.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Harmon MP, Castro FG, Coe K: Acculturation and cervical cancer: knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors of Hispanic women. Women Health. 1996, 24 (3): 37-57.CrossRefPubMed Harmon MP, Castro FG, Coe K: Acculturation and cervical cancer: knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors of Hispanic women. Women Health. 1996, 24 (3): 37-57.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Scarinci IC, Garcia FA, Kobetz E, Partridge EE, Brandt HM, Bell MC, Dignan M, Ma GX, Daye JL, Castle PE: Cervical cancer prevention: new tools and old barriers. Cancer. 2010, 116 (11): 2531-2542.PubMedPubMedCentral Scarinci IC, Garcia FA, Kobetz E, Partridge EE, Brandt HM, Bell MC, Dignan M, Ma GX, Daye JL, Castle PE: Cervical cancer prevention: new tools and old barriers. Cancer. 2010, 116 (11): 2531-2542.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference U.S. Census Bureau: U.S. Census Bureau, Detailed Tables: Yakima County, Washington. 2002, U.S. Census Bureau, American Fact Finder, Yakima County, WA, http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml U.S. Census Bureau: U.S. Census Bureau, Detailed Tables: Yakima County, Washington. 2002, U.S. Census Bureau, American Fact Finder, Yakima County, WA, http://​factfinder2.​census.​gov/​faces/​nav/​jsf/​pages/​index.​xhtml
13.
go back to reference Coronado GD, Farias A, Thompson B, Godina R, Oderkirk W: Attitudes and beliefs about colorectal cancer among Mexican Americans in communities along the US-Mexico border. Ethn Dis. 2006, 16 (2): 421-427.PubMed Coronado GD, Farias A, Thompson B, Godina R, Oderkirk W: Attitudes and beliefs about colorectal cancer among Mexican Americans in communities along the US-Mexico border. Ethn Dis. 2006, 16 (2): 421-427.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Byrd TL, Wilson KM, Smith JL, Heckert AL, Orians C, Vernon SW, Fernandez-Esquer M, Fernandez ME: Using Intervention Mapping as a Participatory Strategy: Development of a Cervical Cancer Intervention for Hispanic Women. Health Educ Behav. 2012, Epub ahead of print Byrd TL, Wilson KM, Smith JL, Heckert AL, Orians C, Vernon SW, Fernandez-Esquer M, Fernandez ME: Using Intervention Mapping as a Participatory Strategy: Development of a Cervical Cancer Intervention for Hispanic Women. Health Educ Behav. 2012, Epub ahead of print
15.
go back to reference Hansen LK, Feigl P, Modiano MR, Lopez JA, Escobedo Sluder S, Moinpour CM, Pauler DK, Meyskens FL: An educational program to increase cervical and breast cancer screening in Hispanic women: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Nurs. 2005, 28 (1): 47-53. 10.1097/00002820-200501000-00007.CrossRefPubMed Hansen LK, Feigl P, Modiano MR, Lopez JA, Escobedo Sluder S, Moinpour CM, Pauler DK, Meyskens FL: An educational program to increase cervical and breast cancer screening in Hispanic women: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Nurs. 2005, 28 (1): 47-53. 10.1097/00002820-200501000-00007.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hunter JB, de Zapien JG, Papenfuss M, Fernandez ML, Meister J, Giuliano AR: The impact of a promotora on increasing routine chronic disease prevention among women aged 40 and older at the U.S.-Mexico border. Health Educ Behav. 2004, 31 (4 Suppl): 18S-28S. 10.1177/1090198104266004.CrossRefPubMed Hunter JB, de Zapien JG, Papenfuss M, Fernandez ML, Meister J, Giuliano AR: The impact of a promotora on increasing routine chronic disease prevention among women aged 40 and older at the U.S.-Mexico border. Health Educ Behav. 2004, 31 (4 Suppl): 18S-28S. 10.1177/1090198104266004.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Larkey L: Las mujeres saludables: reaching Latinas for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer prevention and screening. J Community Health. 2006, 31 (1): 69-77. 10.1007/s10900-005-8190-2.CrossRefPubMed Larkey L: Las mujeres saludables: reaching Latinas for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer prevention and screening. J Community Health. 2006, 31 (1): 69-77. 10.1007/s10900-005-8190-2.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Larkey LK, Gonzalez JA, Mar LE, Glantz N: Latina recruitment for cancer prevention education via Community Based Participatory Research strategies. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009, 30 (1): 47-54. 10.1016/j.cct.2008.08.003.CrossRefPubMed Larkey LK, Gonzalez JA, Mar LE, Glantz N: Latina recruitment for cancer prevention education via Community Based Participatory Research strategies. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009, 30 (1): 47-54. 10.1016/j.cct.2008.08.003.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Changing health behaviour intervention and research with social cognition models. 2002, Open University Press, Bukingham, UK Changing health behaviour intervention and research with social cognition models. 2002, Open University Press, Bukingham, UK
20.
go back to reference Bandura A: Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychol Rev. 1977, 84 (2): 191-215.CrossRefPubMed Bandura A: Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychol Rev. 1977, 84 (2): 191-215.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Freeman HP: A model patient navigator program. Oncol Issues. 2004, 19: 44-47. Freeman HP: A model patient navigator program. Oncol Issues. 2004, 19: 44-47.
22.
go back to reference Dohan D, Schrag D: Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients. Cancer. 2005, 104: 848-855. 10.1002/cncr.21214.CrossRefPubMed Dohan D, Schrag D: Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients. Cancer. 2005, 104: 848-855. 10.1002/cncr.21214.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cervical cancer screening and adherence to follow-up among Hispanic women study protocol: a randomized controlled trial to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women
Authors
Catherine Duggan
Gloria Coronado
Javiera Martinez
Theresa L Byrd
Elizabeth Carosso
Cathy Lopez
Maria Benavides
Beti Thompson
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-170

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Cancer 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine