Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Technical Innovation

Central Pedicled Breast Reduction Technique in Male Patients After Massive Weight Loss

Authors: Alexander Stoff, Fernando J. Velasco-Laguardia, Dirk F. Richter

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Male patients after massive weight loss often suffer from redundant skin and soft tissue in the anterior and lateral chest region, causing various deformities of pseudogynecomastia. Techniques with free or pedicled nipple–areola complex (NAC) transposition are widely accepted. The authors present their approach to male breast reduction with preservation of the NAC on a central dermoglandular pedicle and a wide elliptical tissue excision of breast and lateral thorax tissue in combination with liposuction. Male breast reduction was performed on patients after moderate to massive weight loss due to diet or bariatric procedures. Former procedures included free nipple–areola grafts or inferior pedicled techniques for NAC preservation. As a modification, we performed a central pedicled breast reduction on nine male patients with excessive liposuction of the pedicle and a horizontal elliptical skin removal, allowing for sufficient tissue removal at the lateral thorax. From October 2010 until June 2011, nine male patients had central pedicled breast reconstructions after massive weight loss. Mean age was 29.1 years, mean preoperative body mass index was 29.2, and mean preoperative weight loss was 63.9 kg. The chest wall improvement was rated “very good” by eight patients. No major complications occurred in all nine patients. Male chest deformities after massive weight loss can be dealt by several approaches. The optimal scar positioning and the preservation of NAC may be the most challenging aspects of these procedures. Therefore, the preservation of the NAC on a central dermoglandular pedicle with a horizontal submammary scar course may optimize the esthetic outcome.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Rohrich R, Ha R, Kenkel J, et al. Classifications and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:909.PubMedCrossRef Rohrich R, Ha R, Kenkel J, et al. Classifications and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:909.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gheita A. Gynecomastia: the horizontal ellipse method for its correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(5):795–801.PubMedCrossRef Gheita A. Gynecomastia: the horizontal ellipse method for its correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(5):795–801.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP. Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(5):1301–11.PubMedCrossRef Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP. Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(5):1301–11.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Aly AS. Body contouring after massive weight loss. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2006. Aly AS. Body contouring after massive weight loss. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2006.
7.
go back to reference Stoff A, Reichenberger MA, Richter DF. Male breast contouring after massive weight loss. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2006;38(4):209–16. German.PubMedCrossRef Stoff A, Reichenberger MA, Richter DF. Male breast contouring after massive weight loss. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2006;38(4):209–16. German.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beckenstein MS, Windle BH, Stroup Jr RT. Anatomical parameters for nipple position and areolar diameter in males. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36:33.PubMedCrossRef Beckenstein MS, Windle BH, Stroup Jr RT. Anatomical parameters for nipple position and areolar diameter in males. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36:33.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beer GM, Budi S, Seifert B, et al. Configuration and localization of the nipple–areola complex in men. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1947.PubMedCrossRef Beer GM, Budi S, Seifert B, et al. Configuration and localization of the nipple–areola complex in men. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1947.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shulman O, Badani E, Wolf Y, et al. Appropriate location of the nipple–areola complex in males. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:348.PubMedCrossRef Shulman O, Badani E, Wolf Y, et al. Appropriate location of the nipple–areola complex in males. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:348.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hodgson EL, Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM. Ultrasonic liposuction in the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:646.PubMedCrossRef Hodgson EL, Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM. Ultrasonic liposuction in the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:646.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tashkandi M, Al-Qattan MM, Hassanain JM, et al. The surgical management of high grade gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:17.PubMedCrossRef Tashkandi M, Al-Qattan MM, Hassanain JM, et al. The surgical management of high grade gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:17.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kornstein AN, Cinelli PB. Inferior pedicle reduction technique for larger forms of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1992;16:331.PubMedCrossRef Kornstein AN, Cinelli PB. Inferior pedicle reduction technique for larger forms of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1992;16:331.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Persichetti P, Berloco M, Casadei RM, et al. Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:948.PubMedCrossRef Persichetti P, Berloco M, Casadei RM, et al. Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:948.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Song AY, Jean RD, Hurwitz DJ, et al. A classification of contour deformities after bariatric weight loss: the Pittsburgh rating scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1535.PubMedCrossRef Song AY, Jean RD, Hurwitz DJ, et al. A classification of contour deformities after bariatric weight loss: the Pittsburgh rating scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1535.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mladick RA, Hunstad JP, Pitman GH, et al. Practice forum: male body contouring. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:307.PubMedCrossRef Mladick RA, Hunstad JP, Pitman GH, et al. Practice forum: male body contouring. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:307.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Richter DF, Stoff A. The upper lateral thoracic lift (ULTL). Volume 2, number 2. Plastic surgery pulse news. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2010. Richter DF, Stoff A. The upper lateral thoracic lift (ULTL). Volume 2, number 2. Plastic surgery pulse news. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2010.
18.
go back to reference Richter DF, Stoff A. Back and lateral fold contouring. In: Nahai F, editor. The art of aesthetic surgery: principles and techniques. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2010. Richter DF, Stoff A. Back and lateral fold contouring. In: Nahai F, editor. The art of aesthetic surgery: principles and techniques. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Central Pedicled Breast Reduction Technique in Male Patients After Massive Weight Loss
Authors
Alexander Stoff
Fernando J. Velasco-Laguardia
Dirk F. Richter
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0583-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Obesity Surgery 3/2012 Go to the issue