Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2011

01-11-2011 | Clinical Research

Cementless Revision TKA with Bone Grafting of Osseous Defects Restores Bone Stock with a Low Revision Rate at 4 to 10 years

Authors: S. A. Hanna, MRCS, W. J. S. Aston, FRCS (Orth), N. J. de Roeck, FRCS (Orth), A. Gough-Palmer, FRCR, D. P. Powles, MD, FRCS

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 11/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Addressing bone loss in revision TKA is challenging despite the array of options to reconstruct the deficient bone. Biologic reconstruction using morselized loosely-packed bone graft potentially allows for augmentation of residual bone stock while offering physiologic load transfer. However it is unclear whether the reconstructions are durable.

Questions/purposes

We therefore sought to determine (1) survivorship and complications, (2) function, and (3) radiographic findings of cementless revision TKA in combination with loosely-packed morselized bone graft to reconstruct osseous defects at revision TKA.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients who had undergone revision TKAs using cementless long-stemmed components in combination with morselized loose bone graft at our institution. There were 26 men and 30 women with a mean age of 68.3 years (range, 56–89 years). Patients were followed to assess symptoms and function and to detect radiographic loosening, component migration, and graft incorporation. The minimum followup was 4 years (mean, 7.3 years; range, 4–10 years).

Results

Cumulative prosthesis survival, with revision as an end point, was 98% at 10 years. The mean Oxford Knee Scores improved from 21 (36%) preoperatively to 41 (68%) at final followup. Five patients (9%) had reoperations for complications.

Conclusions

Our observations suggest this technique is reproducible and obviates the need for excessive bone resection, use of large metal augments, mass allografts, or custom prostheses. It allows for bone stock to be reconstructed reliably with durable midterm component fixation.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry, Annual Report. Adelaide, Australia: AOA; 2009. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry, Annual Report. Adelaide, Australia: AOA; 2009.
2.
go back to reference Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A. Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:104–112.PubMedCrossRef Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A. Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:104–112.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Board TN, Rooney P, Kearney JN, Kay PR. Impaction allografting in revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:852–857.PubMedCrossRef Board TN, Rooney P, Kearney JN, Kay PR. Impaction allografting in revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:852–857.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash, HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:45–51.PubMedCrossRef Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash, HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:45–51.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bradley GW. Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:113–118.PubMedCrossRef Bradley GW. Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:113–118.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brand MG, Daley RJ, Ewald FC, Scott RD. Tibial tray augmentation with modular metal wedges for tibial bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:71–79. PubMed Brand MG, Daley RJ, Ewald FC, Scott RD. Tibial tray augmentation with modular metal wedges for tibial bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:71–79. PubMed
7.
go back to reference Buck BE, Malinin TI. Human bone and tissue allografts: preparation and safety. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;303:8–17. PubMed Buck BE, Malinin TI. Human bone and tissue allografts: preparation and safety. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;303:8–17. PubMed
8.
go back to reference Deirmengian CA, Lonner JH. What’s new in adult reconstructive knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2556–2565. PubMedCrossRef Deirmengian CA, Lonner JH. What’s new in adult reconstructive knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2556–2565. PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O. Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:574–580. PubMedCrossRef Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O. Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:574–580. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dennis DA. Repairing minor bone defects: augmentation and autograft. Orthopedics. 1998;21:1036–1038.PubMed Dennis DA. Repairing minor bone defects: augmentation and autograft. Orthopedics. 1998;21:1036–1038.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Engh GA. Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH, eds. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1997:63–120. Engh GA. Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH, eds. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1997:63–120.
12.
go back to reference Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2640–2647.PubMedCrossRef Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2640–2647.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12. PubMed Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12. PubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Hoppenfeld S, de Boer P, eds. The knee. In: Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics: The Anatomic Approach. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Williams & Williams; 2003:504–510. Hoppenfeld S, de Boer P, eds. The knee. In: Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics: The Anatomic Approach. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Williams & Williams; 2003:504–510.
16.
go back to reference Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1221–1228.PubMedCrossRef Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1221–1228.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.PubMedCrossRef Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lee K, Goodman SB. Current state and future of joint replacements in the hip and knee. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5:383–93.PubMedCrossRef Lee K, Goodman SB. Current state and future of joint replacements in the hip and knee. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5:383–93.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lidgren L, Robertsson O, Dahl A. The Swedish Arthroplasty, Register—Annual Report 2009. Lund, Sweden: Wallin & Dalholm, AB; 2009:48. Lidgren L, Robertsson O, Dahl A. The Swedish Arthroplasty, Register—Annual Report 2009. Lund, Sweden: Wallin & Dalholm, AB; 2009:48.
20.
go back to reference Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:99–103. PubMedCrossRef Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:99–103. PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lotke PA, Wong RY, Ecker ML. The use of methylmethacrylate in primary total knee replacements with large tibial defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;270:288–294. PubMed Lotke PA, Wong RY, Ecker ML. The use of methylmethacrylate in primary total knee replacements with large tibial defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;270:288–294. PubMed
22.
go back to reference Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Engh GA, Clark CR, Lotke P, Saleh KJ. Radiographic prediction of intraoperative bone loss in knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:51–58.PubMedCrossRef Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Engh GA, Clark CR, Lotke P, Saleh KJ. Radiographic prediction of intraoperative bone loss in knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:51–58.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1010–1014.PubMed Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1010–1014.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Nadaud MC, Fehring TK, Fehring K. Underestimation of osteolysis in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:110–115. PubMedCrossRef Nadaud MC, Fehring TK, Fehring K. Underestimation of osteolysis in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:110–115. PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Rand JA.Tibial wedge augmentation for bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty: a followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:151–155.PubMed Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Rand JA.Tibial wedge augmentation for bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty: a followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:151–155.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Patel JV, Masonis JL, Guerin J, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. The fate of augments to treat type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:195–199.PubMedCrossRef Patel JV, Masonis JL, Guerin J, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. The fate of augments to treat type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:195–199.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pour AE, Parvizi J, Slenker N, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF. Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1735–1741.PubMedCrossRef Pour AE, Parvizi J, Slenker N, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF. Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1735–1741.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pradhan NR, Bale L, Kay P, Porter ML. Salvage revision total knee replacement using the Endo-Model rotating hinge prosthesis. Knee. 2004;11:469–473.PubMedCrossRef Pradhan NR, Bale L, Kay P, Porter ML. Salvage revision total knee replacement using the Endo-Model rotating hinge prosthesis. Knee. 2004;11:469–473.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty: a sequel. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:63–65.PubMedCrossRef Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty: a sequel. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:63–65.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Saha S, Pal S. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984;18:435–462. PubMedCrossRef Saha S, Pal S. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984;18:435–462. PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.PubMedCrossRef Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sheng PY, Konttinen L, Lehto M, Ogino D, Jamsen E, Nevalainen, J, Pajamaki J, Halonen P, Konttinen YT. Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1425–1430. PubMedCrossRef Sheng PY, Konttinen L, Lehto M, Ogino D, Jamsen E, Nevalainen, J, Pajamaki J, Halonen P, Konttinen YT. Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1425–1430. PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Smith S, Naima VS, Freeman MA. The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:3–8.PubMedCrossRef Smith S, Naima VS, Freeman MA. The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:3–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Springer BD, Sim FH, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. The modular segmental kinematic rotating hinge for nonneoplastic limb salvage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;421:181–187.PubMedCrossRef Springer BD, Sim FH, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. The modular segmental kinematic rotating hinge for nonneoplastic limb salvage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;421:181–187.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Stevenson S, Emery SE, Goldberg VM. Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:66–74.PubMedCrossRef Stevenson S, Emery SE, Goldberg VM. Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:66–74.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Suarez J, Griffin W, Springer B, Fehring T, Mason JB, Odum S. Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail? J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:99–103.PubMedCrossRef Suarez J, Griffin W, Springer B, Fehring T, Mason JB, Odum S. Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail? J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:99–103.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Whiteside LA. Cementless revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:160–167. PubMed Whiteside LA. Cementless revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:160–167. PubMed
38.
go back to reference Whiteside LA. Cementless revision total knee arthroplasty. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL, eds. The Adult Knee. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins; 2003:1465–1472. Whiteside LA. Cementless revision total knee arthroplasty. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL, eds. The Adult Knee. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins; 2003:1465–1472.
39.
go back to reference Whiteside LA. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Monograph Series Number 24. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2003. Whiteside LA. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Monograph Series Number 24. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2003.
40.
go back to reference Whiteside LA. Cementless fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:140–148. PubMedCrossRef Whiteside LA. Cementless fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:140–148. PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD. The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:981–987. PubMedCrossRef Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD. The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:981–987. PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ullmark G, Hovelius L. Impacted morsellized allograft and cement for revision total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary report of 3 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:10–12.PubMedCrossRef Ullmark G, Hovelius L. Impacted morsellized allograft and cement for revision total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary report of 3 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:10–12.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Utting MR, Newman JH. Customised hinged knee replacements as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2004;11:475–479. PubMedCrossRef Utting MR, Newman JH. Customised hinged knee replacements as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2004;11:475–479. PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cementless Revision TKA with Bone Grafting of Osseous Defects Restores Bone Stock with a Low Revision Rate at 4 to 10 years
Authors
S. A. Hanna, MRCS
W. J. S. Aston, FRCS (Orth)
N. J. de Roeck, FRCS (Orth)
A. Gough-Palmer, FRCR
D. P. Powles, MD, FRCS
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1938-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2011 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2010 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society

New Definition for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society

Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2010 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society

Leukocytosis Is Common After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2010 Meeting of the MSIS

Sterility of the Personal Protection System in Total Joint Arthroplasty