Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Cataract | Retinal Disorders

Results of lamellar macular hole-associated epiretinal proliferation embedding technique for the treatment of degenerative lamellar macular hole

Authors: Kosuke Takahashi, Yuki Morizane, Shuhei Kimura, Yusuke Shiode, Shinichiro Doi, Toshio Okanouchi, Ippei Takasu, Yasushi Inoue, Fumio Shiraga

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the outcomes of embedding lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) into retinal cleavage for the surgical treatment of degenerative lamellar macular hole (LMH).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 34 consecutive eyes of degenerative LMH patients who underwent vitrectomy with LHEP embedding and who were followed up for at least 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and macular structure preoperatively and at the final follow-up were compared.

Results

The mean (±SD) follow-up period was 30.0 ± 17.7 months. Twelve patients (35.3%) were men, and the mean age was 69.6 ± 10.1 years. Twenty-three eyes (67.6%) underwent simultaneous cataract surgery. BCVA was significantly improved at the final visit, from 0.31 ± 0.25 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units to 0.10 ± 0.25 (P < 0.01). This improvement in mean BCVA at the final postoperative visit occurred regardless of whether the eyes underwent simultaneous cataract surgery, from 0.30 ± 0.26 preoperatively to 0.04 ± 0.16 (P < 0.01) in the “with cataract surgery” group and from 0.32 ± 0.26 preoperatively to 0.21 ± 0.35 (P < 0.05) in the “without cataract surgery” group. CRT was also significantly improved at the final visit, from 123.2 ± 42.6 μm preoperatively to 191.2 ± 42.6 μm (P < 0.01). External limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone defects were detected in 17 (50.0%) and 15 (44.1%) eyes, respectively, but these were resolved in 10 (58.8%) and 7 (46.7%) eyes, respectively, at the final visit. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed.

Conclusions

Embedding LHEP may be an effective and safe procedure to treat degenerative LMH.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
25.
go back to reference Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P et al (2001) Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 108:2279–2283CrossRef Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P et al (2001) Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 108:2279–2283CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Michels RG (1982) A clinical and histopathologic study of epiretinal membranes affecting the macula and removed by vitreous surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 80:580–656PubMedPubMedCentral Michels RG (1982) A clinical and histopathologic study of epiretinal membranes affecting the macula and removed by vitreous surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 80:580–656PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Results of lamellar macular hole-associated epiretinal proliferation embedding technique for the treatment of degenerative lamellar macular hole
Authors
Kosuke Takahashi
Yuki Morizane
Shuhei Kimura
Yusuke Shiode
Shinichiro Doi
Toshio Okanouchi
Ippei Takasu
Yasushi Inoue
Fumio Shiraga
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
Cataract
Peeling
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04425-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 10/2019 Go to the issue