Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Cataract | Research article

Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests

Authors: Jiayi Xu, Chen Li, Lijun Wang, Caixin Li, Xin Li, Peirong Lu

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement of lens thickness (LT) measurements made by contact A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 as well as the influence of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) measurement differences on LT measurement in cataract patients in the two techniques.

Methods

1247 cataract patients (1247 eyes) participated in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Ocular biometric measurements were performed with Lenstar LS900 and A-scan ultrasonography respectively, and the measured results of AL, ACD and LT were compared using Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and Bland-Altman analyses.

Results

Bland-Altman analyses showed poor agreement between the A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 in measuring AL and ACD. The average difference of LT was 0.01 mm; the consistency limit was − 0.86 mm, 0.88 mm; and 95.27% of datapoints were within the 95% consistency limit. The consistency of LT measurements between the two techniques was poor for those subjects whose ACD or AL values were beyond the 95% consistency limit. Among the subjects whose AL or ACD values measured by A-scan ultrasonography were greater than those measured by Lenstar LS900, 93.33% of them were within the 95% consistency limit, suggesting that the consistency of LT measurement between the two techniques was poor. Of patients whose ACD or AL measured by A-scan ultrasonography were smaller than that of Lenstar LS900, 96.01% of them were within the 95% consistency limit.

Conclusions

There was good agreement of the LT measurements between A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900, except for the axis deviating from the apparent axis during A-scan ultrasonography. If this error can be avoided, A-scan ultrasonography can replace Lenstar LS900 in LT measurement in cataract patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:333–40.CrossRef Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:333–40.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:17–24.CrossRef Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:17–24.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula; a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:700–12 errata,1994;20:677.CrossRef Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula; a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:700–12 errata,1994;20:677.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lim MC, Lim LS, Gazzard G, et al. Lens opacity, thickness, and position in subjects with acute primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(3):260–3.CrossRef Lim MC, Lim LS, Gazzard G, et al. Lens opacity, thickness, and position in subjects with acute primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(3):260–3.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference George R, Paul PG, Baskaran M, et al. Ocular biometry in occludable angles and angle closure glaucoma; a population based survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:399–402.CrossRef George R, Paul PG, Baskaran M, et al. Ocular biometry in occludable angles and angle closure glaucoma; a population based survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:399–402.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Olsen T, Hoffmann P. C constant; new concept for ray tracing–assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:764–73.CrossRef Olsen T, Hoffmann P. C constant; new concept for ray tracing–assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:764–73.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hamzeh N, Moghimi S, Latifi G, Mohammadi M, Khatibi N, Lin SC. Lens thickness assessment; anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus A-scan ultrasonography. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec 18;8(6):1151–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Hamzeh N, Moghimi S, Latifi G, Mohammadi M, Khatibi N, Lin SC. Lens thickness assessment; anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus A-scan ultrasonography. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec 18;8(6):1151–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Schiano-Lomoriello D. Agreement between lens thickness measurements by ultrasound immersion biometry and optical biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1463–8.CrossRef Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Schiano-Lomoriello D. Agreement between lens thickness measurements by ultrasound immersion biometry and optical biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1463–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nemeth J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(1):85–8.CrossRef Nemeth J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(1):85–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tappeiner C, Rohrer K, Frueh BE, et al. Clinical comparison of biometry using the non-contact optical low coherence reflectometer (Lenstar LS 900) and contact ultrasound biometer (Tomey AL.3000) in cataract eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(5):666–7.CrossRef Tappeiner C, Rohrer K, Frueh BE, et al. Clinical comparison of biometry using the non-contact optical low coherence reflectometer (Lenstar LS 900) and contact ultrasound biometer (Tomey AL.3000) in cataract eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(5):666–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Xue LP, Liu H, Shen ZW, et al. Comparison of Lenstar and A-scan ultrasound biometry in the measurement of anterior chamber depth and lens thickness. J Clin Opthalmol. 2012;20(5):418–20. Xue LP, Liu H, Shen ZW, et al. Comparison of Lenstar and A-scan ultrasound biometry in the measurement of anterior chamber depth and lens thickness. J Clin Opthalmol. 2012;20(5):418–20.
12.
go back to reference Bjelos Roncevic M, Busic M, Cima I, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(1):83–7.CrossRef Bjelos Roncevic M, Busic M, Cima I, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(1):83–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(4):644–8.CrossRef Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(4):644–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Aufarth GU. Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(6):807–10.CrossRef Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Aufarth GU. Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(6):807–10.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, et al. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(7):949–53.CrossRef Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, et al. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(7):949–53.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Walti R, et al. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(11):2087–92.CrossRef Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Walti R, et al. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(11):2087–92.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(9):765–73.CrossRef Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(9):765–73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests
Authors
Jiayi Xu
Chen Li
Lijun Wang
Caixin Li
Xin Li
Peirong Lu
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Cataract
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01754-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2020 Go to the issue