Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Article

Case–control study on the survival of abutment teeth of partially dentate patients

Authors: K. Stegelmann, M. Dirheimer, E. Ludwig, O. Moldovan, H. Rudolph, R. G. Luthardt, B. A. Just

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Due to the scarce amount of data available, a retrospective analysis of patients treated with removable dental prostheses (RDPs) was performed. The aim of the trial was to evaluate the rate of repairs and failures of attachment-retained RDPs (AR-RDPs) compared to clasp-retained RDPs (CR-RDPs) with respect to cofactors (e.g., type of loading). In this respect, two hypotheses were proposed: AR-RDPs are more prone to repairs than CR-RDPs, and AR-RDPs are more prone to fail than CR-RDPs.

Materials and method

Two hundred three patients treated with 135 AR-RDPs and 68 CR-RDPs between 1994 and 2006 were evaluated in this trial. The dental treatment was carried out in the clinical training course of senior students. Kaplan–Meier estimates were calculated for the primary end point (repairs) and for the secondary end point (failures).

Results

The survival of CR-RDPs and AR-RDPs did show significant differences regarding repairs (p = 0.034) but not with regard to failures (p = 0.169). Prostheses of the non-axially loaded group showed no significant differences in the frequency of repairs and failures.

Conclusions

Technical complications occurred more frequently in the CR-RDP group. Taking the higher observation time in the AR-RDP group into account, CR-RDPs are more prone to repairs, especially to those with technical background (e.g., fracture of the metal framework).

Clinical relevance

The use of crowns with rod attachments on tilted teeth seems to be an appropriate treatment approach in order to simplify removable dental prosthesis design.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Owall B (1991) Precision attachment retained removable partial dentures: 1 technical long-term study. Int J Prosthodont 4:249–257PubMed Owall B (1991) Precision attachment retained removable partial dentures: 1 technical long-term study. Int J Prosthodont 4:249–257PubMed
7.
go back to reference Wagner B, Kern M (2000) Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures 10 years after insertion: success rates, hygienic problems, and technical failures. Clin Oral Investig 4:74–80. doi:10.1007/s007840050119 PubMedCrossRef Wagner B, Kern M (2000) Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures 10 years after insertion: success rates, hygienic problems, and technical failures. Clin Oral Investig 4:74–80. doi:10.​1007/​s007840050119 PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kapur KK, Deupree R, Dent RJ, Hasse AL (1994) A randomized clinical trial of two basic removable partial denture designs. Part I: Comparisons of five-year success rates and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 72:268–282. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(94)90340-9 PubMedCrossRef Kapur KK, Deupree R, Dent RJ, Hasse AL (1994) A randomized clinical trial of two basic removable partial denture designs. Part I: Comparisons of five-year success rates and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 72:268–282. doi:10.​1016/​0022-3913(94)90340-9 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Isidor F, Budtz-Jorgensen E (1990) Periodontal conditions following treatment with distally extending cantilever bridges or removable partial dentures in elderly patients. A 5-year study. J Periodontol 61:21–26PubMedCrossRef Isidor F, Budtz-Jorgensen E (1990) Periodontal conditions following treatment with distally extending cantilever bridges or removable partial dentures in elderly patients. A 5-year study. J Periodontol 61:21–26PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Luthardt RG, Marre B, Heinecke A, Gerss J, Aggstaller H, Busche E, Dressler P, Gitt I, Hannak W, Hartmann S, Heydecke G, Jahn F, Kern M, Mundt T, Pospiech P, Stark H, Wostmann B, Walter MH (2010) The Randomized Shortened Dental Arch study (RaSDA): design and protocol. Trials 11:15. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-15 PubMedCrossRef Luthardt RG, Marre B, Heinecke A, Gerss J, Aggstaller H, Busche E, Dressler P, Gitt I, Hannak W, Hartmann S, Heydecke G, Jahn F, Kern M, Mundt T, Pospiech P, Stark H, Wostmann B, Walter MH (2010) The Randomized Shortened Dental Arch study (RaSDA): design and protocol. Trials 11:15. doi:10.​1186/​1745-6215-11-15 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Walter MH, Weber A, Marre B, Gitt I, Gerss J, Hannak W, Hartmann S, Heydecke G, Huppertz J, Jahn F, Ludwig A, Mundt T, Kern M, Klein V, Pospiech P, Stumbaum M, Wolfart S, Wostmann B, Busche E, Boning K, Luthardt RG (2010) The randomized shortened dental arch study: tooth loss. J Dent Res 89:818–822. doi:10.1177/0022034510366817 PubMedCrossRef Walter MH, Weber A, Marre B, Gitt I, Gerss J, Hannak W, Hartmann S, Heydecke G, Huppertz J, Jahn F, Ludwig A, Mundt T, Kern M, Klein V, Pospiech P, Stumbaum M, Wolfart S, Wostmann B, Busche E, Boning K, Luthardt RG (2010) The randomized shortened dental arch study: tooth loss. J Dent Res 89:818–822. doi:10.​1177/​0022034510366817​ PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Case–control study on the survival of abutment teeth of partially dentate patients
Authors
K. Stegelmann
M. Dirheimer
E. Ludwig
O. Moldovan
H. Rudolph
R. G. Luthardt
B. A. Just
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0661-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2012 Go to the issue