Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

Adjusting health care: practicing care for socially vulnerable type 2 diabetes patients

Authors: Sofie á Rogvi, Ann Dorrit Guassora, Gitte Wind, Nina Tvistholm, Solveig May-Britt Jansen, Inge Birgitte Hansen, Hans Joergen Duckert Perrild, Ulla Christensen

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Type 2 diabetes cluster in lower social groups and people with type 2 diabetes from lower social groups experience more complications, benefit less from health services and live shorter lives than people with type 2 diabetes from higher social groups. Different logics govern diabetes care and potentially influence the possibility of socially vulnerable type 2 diabetes patients to access and benefit from health services. In order to understand which practice and underlying logic enable socially vulnerable type 2 diabetes patients to access and benefit from diabetes care we aim to describe what professionals at a specialized diabetes clinic do to adjust services to patient’s needs and make the tasks involved in diabetes care doable for socially vulnerable patients and how this work is embedded in an organizational and moral context.

Methods

Ethnographic fieldwork combining participant observation and interviews was carried out between February 2017 and March 2018 in a specialized diabetes clinic located in a socially deprived area in the capital region of Denmark. Sixteen patients (9 male, 7 female, aged 35-73 years) and 12 professionals (7 doctors, 4 nurses, 1 secretary) participated in the study. We used Annemarie Mol’s concept of “the logic of care” to guide our analysis.

Results

Our analysis shows that the logic of care and the care practices in this clinic are characterized by a needs-based approach to treatment involving adjustment of services (permeability, timing, and content) and seeing the patient as a person with many needs. Throughout our description of selected care practices, we both characterize how health professionals practice this particular logic of care and the organizational and normative conditions that this logic is entangled with.

Conclusions

Practicing diabetes care based on patients’ needs involves individualization, something often described as an element of patient centred care. Our study shows that this ideal of individualization and adjustment of treatment is possible in practice. Organizational flexibility and an organizational culture that values patient needs enable needs-based care. In order for socially vulnerable type 2 diabetes patients to benefit from health services it is necessary to create conditions under which professionals can attend to these patients’ multiple and complex needs. Adjusting care to these needs demand a variety of professional efforts some of which are hardly predictable or standardisable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. Diabetes [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes WHO. Diabetes [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 27]. Available from: https://​www.​who.​int/​news-room/​fact-sheets/​detail/​diabetes
3.
go back to reference Agardh E, Allebeck P, Hallqvist J, Moradi T, Sidorchuk A. Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(3):804–18.CrossRef Agardh E, Allebeck P, Hallqvist J, Moradi T, Sidorchuk A. Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(3):804–18.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Candib L. Obesity and Diabetes in Vulnerable Populations: Reflection on Proximal and Distal Causes. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(5):547–56.CrossRef Candib L. Obesity and Diabetes in Vulnerable Populations: Reflection on Proximal and Distal Causes. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(5):547–56.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sortsø C, Lauridsen J, Emneus M, Green A, Jensen PB. Social inequality in diabetes patients’ morbidity patterns from diagnosis to death - A Danish register-based investigation. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46:92–101.CrossRef Sortsø C, Lauridsen J, Emneus M, Green A, Jensen PB. Social inequality in diabetes patients’ morbidity patterns from diagnosis to death - A Danish register-based investigation. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46:92–101.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sortsø C, Lauridsen J, Emneus M, Green A, Jensen PB. Socioeconomic inequality of diabetes patients’ health care utilization in Denmark. Health Econ Rev. 2017;7(1):21.CrossRef Sortsø C, Lauridsen J, Emneus M, Green A, Jensen PB. Socioeconomic inequality of diabetes patients’ health care utilization in Denmark. Health Econ Rev. 2017;7(1):21.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Forssas E, Keskimäki I, Reunanen A, Koskinen S. Widening socioeconomic mortality disparity among diabetic people in Finland. Eur J Public Health. 2003;13(1):38–43. Forssas E, Keskimäki I, Reunanen A, Koskinen S. Widening socioeconomic mortality disparity among diabetic people in Finland. Eur J Public Health. 2003;13(1):38–43.
9.
go back to reference Ricci-Cabello I, Ruiz-Pérez I, De Labry-Lima AO, Márquez-Calderón S. Do social inequalities exist in terms of the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, control and monitoring of diabetes? A systematic review. Heal Soc Care Community. 2010;18(6):572–87.CrossRef Ricci-Cabello I, Ruiz-Pérez I, De Labry-Lima AO, Márquez-Calderón S. Do social inequalities exist in terms of the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, control and monitoring of diabetes? A systematic review. Heal Soc Care Community. 2010;18(6):572–87.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Holm AL, Andersen GS, Jørgensen ME, Diderichsen F. Is the rule of halves framework relevant for diabetes care in Copenhagen today? A register-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):1–10.CrossRef Holm AL, Andersen GS, Jørgensen ME, Diderichsen F. Is the rule of halves framework relevant for diabetes care in Copenhagen today? A register-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):1–10.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Heltberg A, Andersen JS, Kragstrup J, Siersma V, Sandholdt H, Ellervik C. Social disparities in diabetes care: a general population study in Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35(1):54–63.CrossRef Heltberg A, Andersen JS, Kragstrup J, Siersma V, Sandholdt H, Ellervik C. Social disparities in diabetes care: a general population study in Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35(1):54–63.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schiøtz ML, Stockmarr A, Høst D, Glümer C, Frølich A. Social disparities in the prevalence of multimorbidity - A register-based population study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–11.CrossRef Schiøtz ML, Stockmarr A, Høst D, Glümer C, Frølich A. Social disparities in the prevalence of multimorbidity - A register-based population study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–11.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sriram V, Sridhar G, Madhu K. Gender differences in living with type 2 diabetes. Int J Diab Dev Ctries. 2001;21(11):97–102. Sriram V, Sridhar G, Madhu K. Gender differences in living with type 2 diabetes. Int J Diab Dev Ctries. 2001;21(11):97–102.
16.
go back to reference Sridhar G. On Psychology and Psychiatry in Diabetes. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;24(5):387–95.CrossRef Sridhar G. On Psychology and Psychiatry in Diabetes. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;24(5):387–95.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Serrano V, Spencer-Bonilla G, Boehmer K, Montori V. Minimally Disruptive Medicine for Patients with Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17. Serrano V, Spencer-Bonilla G, Boehmer K, Montori V. Minimally Disruptive Medicine for Patients with Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17.
18.
go back to reference Nettleton S. The Sociology of Health and Illness. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2013. Nettleton S. The Sociology of Health and Illness. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2013.
19.
go back to reference Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. “This does my head in”. Ethnographic study of self-management by people with diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):1.CrossRef Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. “This does my head in”. Ethnographic study of self-management by people with diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):1.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35.CrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sav A, Salehi A, Mair FS, McMillan SS. Measuring the burden of treatment for chronic disease: Implications of a scoping review of the literature. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):1–15.CrossRef Sav A, Salehi A, Mair FS, McMillan SS. Measuring the burden of treatment for chronic disease: Implications of a scoping review of the literature. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):1–15.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pesantes M, Tetens A, Del Valle A, Miranda J. “It is Not Easy Living with This Illness”: A Syndemic Approach to Medication Adherence and Lifestyle Change among Low-income Diabetes Patients in Lima, Peru. Hum Organ. 2019;78(1):85–96.CrossRef Pesantes M, Tetens A, Del Valle A, Miranda J. “It is Not Easy Living with This Illness”: A Syndemic Approach to Medication Adherence and Lifestyle Change among Low-income Diabetes Patients in Lima, Peru. Hum Organ. 2019;78(1):85–96.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mol A. The Logic of Care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London & New York: Routledge; 2008. 144 p.CrossRef Mol A. The Logic of Care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London & New York: Routledge; 2008. 144 p.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ritholz MD, Beverly EA, Weinger K. Digging deeper: The role of qualitative research in behavioral diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11(6):494–502.CrossRef Ritholz MD, Beverly EA, Weinger K. Digging deeper: The role of qualitative research in behavioral diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11(6):494–502.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rhodes P, Langdon M, Rowley E, Wright J, Small N. What does the use of a computerized checklist mean for patient-centered care? The example of a routine diabetes review. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(3):353–76.CrossRef Rhodes P, Langdon M, Rowley E, Wright J, Small N. What does the use of a computerized checklist mean for patient-centered care? The example of a routine diabetes review. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(3):353–76.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lippert ML, Reventlow S, Kousgaard MB. The uses and implications of standards in general practice consultations. Heal (United Kingdom). 2017;21(1):3–20. Lippert ML, Reventlow S, Kousgaard MB. The uses and implications of standards in general practice consultations. Heal (United Kingdom). 2017;21(1):3–20.
33.
go back to reference Timmermans S, Berg M. The Gold Standard: The Challenge of Evidence-based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2003. 269 p. Timmermans S, Berg M. The Gold Standard: The Challenge of Evidence-based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2003. 269 p.
34.
go back to reference Andersen RS, Vedsted P. Juggling efficiency. An ethnographic study exploring healthcare seeking practices and institutional logics in Danish primary care settings. Soc Sci Med. 2015;128:239–45.CrossRef Andersen RS, Vedsted P. Juggling efficiency. An ethnographic study exploring healthcare seeking practices and institutional logics in Danish primary care settings. Soc Sci Med. 2015;128:239–45.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hunt LM, Bell HS, Martinez-Hume AC, Odumosu F, Howard HA. Corporate Logic in Clinical Care: The Case of Diabetes Management. Med Anthropol Q. 2019;33(4):463–82.CrossRef Hunt LM, Bell HS, Martinez-Hume AC, Odumosu F, Howard HA. Corporate Logic in Clinical Care: The Case of Diabetes Management. Med Anthropol Q. 2019;33(4):463–82.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Beedholm K, Frederiksen K. Patient involvement and institutional logics: A discussion paper. Nurs Philos. 2019;20:e12234.CrossRef Beedholm K, Frederiksen K. Patient involvement and institutional logics: A discussion paper. Nurs Philos. 2019;20:e12234.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kruse FM, Ligtenberg WMR, Oerlemans AJM, Groenewoud S, Jeurissen PPT. How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–16.CrossRef Kruse FM, Ligtenberg WMR, Oerlemans AJM, Groenewoud S, Jeurissen PPT. How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–16.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Meijer M, Engholm G, Grittner U, Bloomfield K. A socioeconomic deprivation index for small areas in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2013;41(6):560–9.CrossRef Meijer M, Engholm G, Grittner U, Bloomfield K. A socioeconomic deprivation index for small areas in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2013;41(6):560–9.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:795–805.CrossRef Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:795–805.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Wens J, Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Sabbe B, Denekens J. GPs’ perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients’ adherence to treatment: A qualitative analysis of barriers and solutions. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:1–10.CrossRef Wens J, Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Sabbe B, Denekens J. GPs’ perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients’ adherence to treatment: A qualitative analysis of barriers and solutions. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:1–10.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Christensen NI, Drejer S, Burns K, Lundstrøm SL, Hempler NF. A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers for diabetes self-management behaviors among persons with type 2 diabetes from a socially disadvantaged area. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:569–80.CrossRef Christensen NI, Drejer S, Burns K, Lundstrøm SL, Hempler NF. A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers for diabetes self-management behaviors among persons with type 2 diabetes from a socially disadvantaged area. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:569–80.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, Dirmaier J. An integrative model of patient-centeredness-A systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107828.CrossRef Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, Dirmaier J. An integrative model of patient-centeredness-A systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107828.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Castro EM, Van Regenmortel T, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Van Hecke A. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ Couns [Internet]. 2016;99(12):1923–1939. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026 Castro EM, Van Regenmortel T, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Van Hecke A. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ Couns [Internet]. 2016;99(12):1923–1939. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2016.​07.​026
46.
go back to reference Öhlen J, Reimer-Kirkham S, Astle B, Håkonson C, Lee J, Eriksson M, et al. Person-centred care dialectics - Inquired in the context of palliative care. Nurs Philos. 2017;18:e12177.CrossRef Öhlen J, Reimer-Kirkham S, Astle B, Håkonson C, Lee J, Eriksson M, et al. Person-centred care dialectics - Inquired in the context of palliative care. Nurs Philos. 2017;18:e12177.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Johnson LCM, Chwastiak L, Poongothai S, Tandon N, Anjana RM, Aravind S, et al. Adaptations and patient responses to behavioral intervention components in a depression-focused chronic disease care model implemented in India. Transl Behav Med. 2018;10(1):35–45.CrossRef Johnson LCM, Chwastiak L, Poongothai S, Tandon N, Anjana RM, Aravind S, et al. Adaptations and patient responses to behavioral intervention components in a depression-focused chronic disease care model implemented in India. Transl Behav Med. 2018;10(1):35–45.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ali MK, Chwastiak L, Poongothai S, Emmert-Fees KMF, Patel SA, Anjana RM, et al. Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol among Patients with Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;324(7):651–62.CrossRef Ali MK, Chwastiak L, Poongothai S, Emmert-Fees KMF, Patel SA, Anjana RM, et al. Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol among Patients with Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;324(7):651–62.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Shackelton R, Link C, Marceau L, Mckinlay J. Does the culture of a medical practice affect the clinical management of diabetes by primary care providers? J Heal Serv Res Policy. 2009;14(2):96–103.CrossRef Shackelton R, Link C, Marceau L, Mckinlay J. Does the culture of a medical practice affect the clinical management of diabetes by primary care providers? J Heal Serv Res Policy. 2009;14(2):96–103.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 2003. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 2003.
51.
go back to reference Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, London and New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 1985.CrossRef Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, London and New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 1985.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Sydor A. Conducting research into hidden or hard-to-reach populations. Nurse Res. 2013;20(3):33–7.CrossRef Sydor A. Conducting research into hidden or hard-to-reach populations. Nurse Res. 2013;20(3):33–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adjusting health care: practicing care for socially vulnerable type 2 diabetes patients
Authors
Sofie á Rogvi
Ann Dorrit Guassora
Gitte Wind
Nina Tvistholm
Solveig May-Britt Jansen
Inge Birgitte Hansen
Hans Joergen Duckert Perrild
Ulla Christensen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06964-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue