Top

Published in:

01-03-2022 | Care | Original Article

Variations in LOS and its main determinants overtime at an academic spinal care center from 2006–2019

Authors: Dandurand Charlotte, N. Hindi Mathew, Ailon Tamir, Boyd Michael, Charest-Morin Raphaële, Dea Nicolas, Dvorak Marcel, Fisher Charles, K. Kwon Brian, Paquette Scott, Street John

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2022

Abstract

Objectives

Efforts to safely reduce hospital LOS while maintaining quality outcomes and patient satisfaction are paramount. The primary goal of this study was to assess trends in LOS at a high-volume quaternary care spine center. Secondary goals were to assess trends in factors most associated with prolonged LOS.

Methods

This is a prospective study of all consecutive patients admitted from January 2006 to December 2019. Data included demographics, diagnostic category (degenerative, oncology, deformity, trauma, other), LOS (mean, median, interquartile range, standard deviation, defined as days from admission to discharge), and in-hospital adverse events.

Results

A total of 13,493 patients were included. Overall LOS has not changed over time with an overall median of 6.3 days (p = 0.451). Median LOS significantly increased for patients treated for degenerative pathology from 2.2 days in 2006 to 3.2 days in 2019 (p = 0.019). LOS has not changed for patients treated for deformity (overall median 6.8 days, p = 0.411), oncology (overall median 11.0 days, p = 0.051), or trauma (overall median 11.8 days, p = 0.582). Emergency admissions increased 3.2%/year for degenerative pathologies (p = < 0.001). Mean age has increased from 48.4 years in 2006 to 58.1 years in 2019 (p = < 0.001). This trend was observed in the deformity, degenerative and trauma group, not for patients treated for oncological disease. More adverse events were significantly associated with increasing age.

Conclusion

This is the first North American study to comprehensively analyze trends in LOS for spinal surgery overtime in an academic center. Overall, LOS has not changed from 2006–2019. Various factors that influence LOS appear to have balanced each other. It may also be explained by the changing epidemiology of both elective and emergency surgeries. These findings provide opportunities for intervention and improvement, targeted at the geriatric population, to reduce length of hospitalization.

Kobayashi K, Ando K, Kato F et al (2019) Predictors of prolonged length of stay after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study. Glob Spine J 9:466–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218800054CrossRef

Inglis T, Banaszek D, Rivers CS et al (2020) In-hospital mortality for the elderly with acute traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 37:2332–2342. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2019.6912CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Banaszek D, Inglis T, Marion TE et al (2020) Effect of frailty on outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 37:839–845. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2019.6581CrossRefPubMed

Kobayashi K, Ando K, Kato F et al (2019) Trends of postoperative length of stay in spine surgery over 10 years in Japan based on a prospective multicenter database. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 177:97–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.12.020CrossRefPubMed

van de Vijsel AR, Heijink R, Schipper M (2015) Has variation in length of stay in acute hospitals decreased? Analysing trends in the variation in LOS between and within Dutch hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 15:438. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1087-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shin JIB, Kim JS, Steinberger J et al (2018) Patient factors contributing to prolonged postoperative length of stay and increased rate of readmission after elective posterior cervical fusion. Clinical Spine Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000512CrossRef

Basques BA, Varthi AG, Golinvaux NS et al (2014) Patient characteristics associated with increased postoperative length of stay and readmission after elective laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:833–840. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000276CrossRef

Kim RB, Wilkerson C, Karsy M et al (2020) Prolonged length of stay and risk of unplanned 30-day readmission after elective spine surgery: propensity score-matched analysis of 33,840 patients. Spine 45:1260–1268. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003520CrossRefPubMed

Lovecchio F, Steinhaus M, Elysee JC et al (2020) Factors associated with short length of stay after long fusions for adult spinal deformity: initial steps toward developing an enhanced recovery pathway. Glob Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220941448CrossRef

10.

McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Chotai S et al (2017) Predictors of extended length of stay, discharge to inpatient rehab, and hospital readmission following elective lumbar spine surgery: introduction of the carolina-semmes grading scale. J Neurosurg Spine 27:382–390. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16928CrossRefPubMed

11.

Halpin RJ, Sugrue PA, Gould RW et al (2010) Standardizing care for high-risk patients in spine surgery: the Northwestern high-risk spine protocol. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2232–2238. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e8abb0CrossRef

12.

Fisher CG, Vaccaro AR, Whang PG et al (2013) Evidence-based recommendations for spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E30-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318275cdd8CrossRef

13.

Sugrue PA, Halpin RJ, Koski TR (2013) Treatment algorithms and protocol practice in high-risk spine surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 24:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2012.12.012CrossRefPubMed

14.

Sethi R, Buchlak QD, Yanamadala V et al (2017) A systematic multidisciplinary initiative for reducing the risk of complications in adult scoliosis surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 26:744–750. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16537CrossRefPubMed

15.

Buchlak QD, Yanamadala V, Leveque J-C, Sethi R (2016) Complication avoidance with pre-operative screening: insights from the Seattle spine team. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9:316–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9351-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Dietz N, Sharma M, Adams S et al (2019) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 130:415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.181CrossRefPubMed

17.

Elsarrag M, Soldozy S, Patel P et al (2019) Enhanced recovery after spine surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 46:E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18700CrossRefPubMed

18.

Dea N, Fisher CG, Batke J et al (2016) Economic evaluation comparing intraoperative cone beam CT-based navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for the placement of spinal pedicle screws: a patient-level data cost-effectiveness analysis. Spine J 16:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.09.062CrossRefPubMed

19.

Ehlers AP, Khor S, Shonnard N et al (2016) Intra-wound antibiotics and infection in spine fusion surgery: a report from Washington State’s SCOAP-CERTAIN collaborative. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 17:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2015.146CrossRef

20.

Gometz A, Maislen D, Youtz C et al (2018) The effectiveness of prehabilitation (Prehab) in both functional and economic outcomes following spinal surgery: a systematic review. Cureus 10:e2675. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Lindbäck Y, Tropp H, Enthoven P et al (2018) PREPARE: presurgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J 18:1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.009CrossRefPubMed

22.

Services M of C Population Estimates–Province of British Columbia. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/data/statistics/people-population-community/population/population-estimates. Accessed 22 Feb 2021

23.

Zheng F, Cammisa FPJ, Sandhu HS et al (2002) Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine 27:818–824CrossRef

24.

Gruskay JA, Fu M, Bohl DD et al (2015) Factors affecting length of stay after elective posterior lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis. Spine J 15:1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.022CrossRefPubMed

25.

Dial BL, Esposito VR, Danilkowicz R et al (2020) Factors associated with extended length of stay and 90-day readmission rates following ACDF. Glob Spine J 10:252–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219843111CrossRef

26.

O’Lynnger TM, Zuckerman SL, Morone PJ et al (2015) Trends for spine surgery for the elderly: implications for access to healthcare in North America. Neurosurgery 77:S136–S141. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000945CrossRefPubMed

27.

Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD et al (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:536–543CrossRef

28.

Raffo CS, Lauerman WC (2006) Predicting morbidity and mortality of lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients in their ninth decade. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000192678.25586.e5CrossRef

29.

Adogwa O, Elsamadicy AA, Vuong VD et al (2017) Geriatric comanagement reduces perioperative complications and shortens duration of hospital stay after lumbar spine surgery: a prospective single-institution experience. J Neurosurg Spine 27:670–675. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.SPINE17199CrossRefPubMed

30.

Johnson WC, Seifi A (2018) Trends of the neurosurgical economy in the United States. J Clin Neurosci 53:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.041CrossRefPubMed

31.

Deyo RA (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:1259. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.338CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Marquez-Lara A, Nandyala SV, Fineberg SJ, Singh K (2014) Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery: a national database analysis between 2002 and 2011. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:476–481. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000165CrossRef

33.

Patil PG, Turner DA, Pietrobon R (2005) National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990–2000. Neurosurgery 57:753–758CrossRef

34.

Zeidman SM, Ducker TB, Raycroft J (1997) Trends and complications in cervical spine surgery: 1989–1993. J Spinal Disord 10:523–526CrossRef

35.

O’Lynnger TM, Zuckerman SL, Morone PJ et al (2015) Trends for spine surgery for the elderly: implications for access to healthcare in North America. Neurosurgery 77(Suppl 4):S136-141. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000945CrossRefPubMed

36.

Puffer RC, Planchard R, Mallory GW, Clarke MJ (2016) Patient-specific factors affecting hospital costs in lumbar spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 24:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141233CrossRefPubMed

37.

Reisener M-J, Pumberger M, Shue J et al (2020) Trends in lumbar spinal fusion-a literature review. J Spine Surg 6:752–761. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Xu Y, Yen D, Whitehead M et al (2019) Use of instrumented lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions: trends and costs over time in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 62:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.017016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Japan Population (2021) Worldometer. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/japan-population/. Accessed 13 Apr 2021

40.

Government of Canada SC (2007) Statistics Canada: age and sex highlight tables, 2006 Census. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/hlt/97-551/index.cfm?Lang=E. Accessed 13 Apr 2021

Title: Variations in LOS and its main determinants overtime at an academic spinal care center from 2006–2019
Authors: Dandurand Charlotte
N. Hindi Mathew
Ailon Tamir
Boyd Michael
Charest-Morin Raphaële
Dea Nicolas
Dvorak Marcel
Fisher Charles
K. Kwon Brian
Paquette Scott
Street John
Publication date: 01-03-2022
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Care
Spinal Surgery
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07086-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Variations in LOS and its main determinants overtime at an academic spinal care center from 2006–2019

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Surgical decompression timing for patients with foot drop from lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis

Correction to: Identification of potentially painful disc fissures in magnetic resonance images using machine‑learning modelling

Evaluation of the degenerative lumbar osseous morphology using zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging (ZTE-MRI)

Robotic-guided placement of cervical pedicle screws: feasibility and accuracy

Analysis of the paraspinal muscle morphology of the lumbar spine using a convolutional neural network (CNN)

Accuracy and agreement of national spine register data for 474 patients compared to corresponding electronic patient records