Top

BMC Health Services Research

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

Social workers’ perspectives on a medical home model for children and adolescents in out of home care – an interview study

Authors: Nina Johansson, Karin Fängström, Georgina Warner

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

This study seeks to explore how social workers have perceived and experienced a medical home model for children and adolescents in out-of-home care in Uppsala County, Sweden.

Method

A qualitative explorative study was conducted, which involved ten semi-structured individual telephone interviews with social workers. The study sample included employees within the social service, working in a specialised case unit who had experience of referring children and/or adolescents to the medical home model called Hälsofam. Data were analysed inductively using thematic analysis.

Results

The findings of the current study indicated that working with Hälsofam has offered social workers a way into the health care sector and an active collaborative working situation, with focus on organised work across the ‘silos’ of care services. However, the findings raised the question of whether or not all children and adolescents have the same possibility to receive care from Hälsofam.

Conclusion

The findings indicated that the Hälsofam model had a positive impact on the interrelations between the social service and the health care sector. Yet, findings showed that personal views of the social worker and the societal situation in which they operate create limitations for providing care for every child and adolescent. This study adds to the extant literature for it addresses the limitations within the work of children and adolescents in out-of-home care.

Available only for authorised users

Mattsson T, Vinnerljung B. Barn i familjehem - Förslag på åtgärder som skulle göra skillnad för samhällets mest utsatta. SNS Förlag; 2016.

World Health Organization. Child maltreatment [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/child-maltreatment.

Kling S, Nilsson I. Familjehemsplacerade skolbarns hälsa och hälsovård -. 2015; Available from: https://wwwallmannabarnh.cdn.triggerfish.cloud/uploads/2015/04/Familjehemsplacerade-skolbarns-hälsa-och-hälsovård.pdf.

Walton S, Bedford H. Immunization of looked-after children and young people: a review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev. 2017;43(4):463–80.CrossRef

Schneiderman JU, Leslie LK, Arnold-Clark JS, McDaniel D, Xie B. Pediatric health assessments of young children in child welfare by placement type. Child Abus Negl 2011;35(1):29–39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.06.007.

Alm S, Låftman SB, Sivertsson F, Bohman H. Poor family relationships in adolescence as a risk factor of in-patient psychiatric care across the life course: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Public Health. 2020;48(7):726–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494820902914.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Department for Education, Department of Health. Promoting the health and well-being of looked-after children: Statutory guidance for local authorities, clinical commissioning groups and NHS England. 2015;(March). Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/promoting-the-health-and-wellbeing-of-looked-after-children%2D%2D2.

Heap J, Fors S, Lennartsson C. Coexisting disadvantages in later life: demographic and socio-economic inequalities. J Popul Ageing. 2017;10(3):247–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-016-9158-y.CrossRefPubMed

Hiller RM, St. Clair MC. The emotional and behavioural symptom trajectories of children in long-term out-of-home care in an English local authority. Child Abus Negl. 2018;81(may):106–17. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.017.

10.

Tordön R, Svedin CG, Fredlund C, Jonsson L, Priebe G, Sydsjö G. Background, experience of abuse, and mental health among adolescents in out-of-home care: a cross-sectional study of a Swedish high school national sample. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019;73(1):16–23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2018.1527397.

11.

Socialstyrelsen. Statistik om socialtjänstinsatser till barn och unga 2018. 2019;1(4):1–4. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/statistik/2019-8-6261.pdf.

12.

Vinnerljung B, Hjern A. Health and health care for children in out-of-home care. Int J Soc Welf. 2018;27(4):321–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12352.CrossRef

13.

Socialdepartementet. Socialtjänstlag (2001:453) [Internet]. Sweden; 2001. Available from: http://rkrattsbaser.gov.se/sfst?bet=2001:453.

14.

Socialdepartementet. Lag (1990:52) med särskilda bestämmelser om vård av unga [Internet]. Sweden; 1990. Available from: http://rkrattsbaser.gov.se/sfst?bet=1990:52.

15.

Finansdepartementet. Kommunallag (2017:725) [Internet]. Sweden; 2017. Available from: http://rkrattsbaser.gov.se/sfst?bet=2017:725.

16.

Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. Nationell kartläggning om hälsoundersökningar av barn och unga inför placering. 2017.

17.

Socialstyrelsen. Grundbok i BBIC [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/ovrigt/2018-10-20.pdf.

18.

Socialstyrelsen. Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd (HSLF-FS 2019:19) om hälsoundersökningar av barn och unga som vårdas utanför det egna hemmet [Internet]. 2019 p. 1–8. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/foreskrifter-och-allmanna-rad/2019-9-6291.pdf.

19.

Randsalu LS, Laurell L. Children in out-of-home care are at high risk of somatic, dental and mental ill health. Acta Paediatr Int J Paediatr. 2018;107(2):301–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14108.CrossRef

20.

Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. Läkarundersökning inför placering av barn och unga. 2015.

21.

Rojanasarot S, Carlson AM. The medical home model and pediatric asthma symptom severity: evidence from a National Health Survey. Popul Health Manag. 2018;21(2):130–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2017.0066.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Mensah T, Hjern A, Håkanson K, Johansson P, Jonsson AK, Mattsson T, et al. Organisational models of health services for children and adolescents in out-of-home care: health technology assessment. Acta Paediatr Int J Paediatr. 2020;109(2):250–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15002.CrossRef

23.

Fox S, Ashmore Z. Multisystemic therapy as an intervention for young people on the edge of care. Br J Soc Work. 2015;45(7):1968–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu054.

24.

Golding KS. Multi-agency and specialist working to meet the mental health needs of children in care and adopted. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010;15(4):573–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104510375933.CrossRefPubMed

25.

McAuley C, Young C. The mental health of looked after children: challenges for CAMHS provision. J Soc Work Pract. 2006;20(1):91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530600566157.CrossRef

26.

Muscat Baron A, Muscat Baron Y, Spencer NJ. The care and health needs off children in residential care in the Maltese islands. Child Care Health Dev. 2001;27(3):251–62.CrossRef

27.

Region Uppsala. Hälsoundersökning av barn och unga som vårdas utanför det egna hemmet [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://regionuppsala.se/globalassets/samverkanswebben/samverkan-inom-halsa-och-vard/vis/halsoundersokning-av-barn-och-unga-som-utreds%2D%2Dutanfor-det-egna-hemmet.pdf.

28.

Uppsala kommun. Statistik om Uppsala kommun 2018. 2020;5. Available from: https://www.uppsala.se/contentassets/f09f9e6b994f41408c66064a2da8470b/statistikfolder_2018.pdf.

29.

Uppsala kommun. Öppna data (psi-data) [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.uppsala.se/kommun-och-politik/kartor-och-statistik/psi-data/.

30.

Balci A, Otterman G, Janson S. Överrepresentation av morbiditet bland barn och ungdomar som placeras i samhällsvård - En deskriptiv journalgranskningsstudie [Internet]. Uppsala universitet; 2020. Available from: gabriel.otterman@kbh.uu.se.

31.

Herbert J, Ghan N, Salveron M, Walsh W. Possible factors supporting cross-agency collaboration in child abuse cases: a scoping review. J Child Sex Abus. 2020;30(2):1–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2020.1856994.

32.

Finney L, Jefkins C. Best practice in OD evaluation: understanding the impact of organisational development. United Kingdom: West Sussex; 2009.

33.

Koeck C. Time for organisational development in healthcare organisations. Br Med J. 1998;317(7168):1267–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1267.CrossRef

34.

Jo Moriarty, Mary Baginsky, Jill Manthorpe. Literature review of roles and issues within the social work profession in England. King’s Collage London [Internet]. 2015;(March):35. Available from: http://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/docs/default-source/publications/research-paper/literature-review-roles-and-issues-within-the-social-work-profession-in-england-2015.pdf?sfvrsn=6.

35.

McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB. Using logic models. In: Handbook of practical program evaluation [internet]. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2004. p. 7–32. Available from: http://surjonopwkub.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2018/02/Handbook_of_Practical_Program_Evaluation__Essential_Texts_for_Nonprofit_and_Public_Leadership_and_Mana_.pdf#page=55.

36.

Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press; 1979.

37.

Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25(10):1229–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015.

39.

Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Fourth edi. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press; 2014.

40.

King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE: Los Angeles; 2010.

41.

Monica W. Socionomens yrkesroll ur olika perspektiv redovisning av en intervjustudie [Internet]. 1999. Available from: https://www.uka.se/download/18.12f25798156a345894e2899/1487841888194/socionomens_yrkesroll.pdf.

42.

Diorio WD. Parental perceptions of the Authority of Public Child Welfare Caseworkers. Fam Soc. 1992;73(4):222–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438949207300404.CrossRef

43.

Anell A. Swedish healthcare under pressure. Health Econ. 2005;14(SUPPL. 1):237–54.CrossRef

44.

Socialdepartementet. Hälso- och sjukvårdslag (2017:30) [Internet]. Sweden; 2017. Available from: http://rkrattsbaser.gov.se/sfst?bet=2017:30.

45.

Mosquera PA, Waenerlund AK, Goicolea I, Gustafsson PE. Equitable health services for the young? A decomposition of income-related inequalities in young adults’ utilization of health care in northern Sweden. Int J Equity Health 2017;16(1):1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0520-3.

46.

Darlington Y, Feeney JA, Rixon K. Interagency collaboration between child protection and mental health services: practices, attitudes and barriers. Child Abus Negl. 2005;29(10):1085–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.04.005.CrossRef

47.

Smith BD, Mogro-Wilson C. Multi-level influences on the practice of inter-agency collaboration in child welfare and substance abuse treatment. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2007;29(5):545–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.06.002.CrossRef

48.

Lessard G, Lavergne C, Chamberland C, Damant D, Turcotte D. Conditions for resolving controversies between social actors in domestic violence and youth protection services: toward innovative collaborative practices. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2006;28(5):511–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.06.007.CrossRef

49.

McFarlane T, Morrison T. Learning and change: Outcomes of inter-agency networking for child protection. Child Care Pract. 1994;1(2):33–44. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279408414685.

50.

Darlington Y, Feeney JA. Collaboration between mental health and child protection services: professionals’ perceptions of best practice. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2008;30(2):187–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.09.005.CrossRef

51.

Lalayants M. Interagency collaboration approach to service delivery in child abuse and neglect: perceptions of professionals. Int J Interdiscip Soc Sci. 2008;3(1):225–36.

52.

Sudderth LK. An uphill climb: the challenge of collaboration in response to family violence in a rural area. J Aggress Maltreatment Trauma. 2003;8(4):17–39.CrossRef

53.

Lloyd C, King R, Chenoweth L. Social work, stress and burnout: a review. J Ment Health. 2002;11(3):255–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230020023642.CrossRef

54.

Green BL, Rockhill A, Burrus S. The role of interagency collaboration for substance abusing families involved with child welfare. Child Welfare. 2008;87(1):29–61.PubMed

55.

Lalayants M. Bridging disciplines in child protection: guidelines for successful collaboration. Int J InterdisciplinarySoc Sci: Ann Rev. 2008;2(5):147–56. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v02i05/52431.

Title: Social workers’ perspectives on a medical home model for children and adolescents in out of home care – an interview study
Authors: Nina Johansson
Karin Fängström
Georgina Warner
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: Care
Published in: BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06737-1

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Social workers’ perspectives on a medical home model for children and adolescents in out of home care – an interview study

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Exploring healthcare staff narratives to understand the role of quality improvement methods in innovative practices during COVID-19

The effects of competition and bundled payment on patient reported outcome measures after hip replacement surgery

Cost analysis of eye bank versus surgeon prepared endothelial grafts

Changes in pediatric hospital care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national qualitative study

Existing barriers to utilization of health services for maternal and newborn care in rural Western Kenya

Artificial intelligence-assisted reduction in patients’ waiting time for outpatient process: a retrospective cohort study