Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Care | Research article

Trends of caesarean section deliveries in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990–2018

Authors: Aaisha Amjad, Abeeha Imran, Nabeeha Shahram, Rubeena Zakar, Ahmed Usman, Muhammad Zakria Zakar, Florian Fischer

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pakistan is among those countries where the number of caesarean section births has increased unusually in the past two decades. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to analyse the trend of caesarean section deliveries among child-bearing women (aged 15–49 years) in Pakistan and to identify maternal socio-demographic factors and pregnancy-related variables associated with the change in caesarean deliveries from 1990 to 2018.

Methods

Secondary data from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys (1990–2018) were analysed. The analysis of data was confined to child-bearing mothers. Sample sizes were 4029, 5721, 7461 and 8287 for the time periods of 1990–91, 2006–07, 2012–13 and 2017–18, respectively. Socio-demographic information of the mothers and pregnancy-related variables were taken as independent variables for the present study. The association between independent variables and caesarean deliveries was measured in terms of unadjusted odds ratios (OR) and adjusted OR (AOR).

Results

The percentages of the mothers who had at least one delivery during the 5 years prior to each survey who had caesarean deliveries increased continuously from 3.2% in 1990–91 to 19.6% in 2017–18. Results indicate that mothers over 24 years of age, located in Punjab, from the richest socio-economic class and living in urban areas were more likely to have delivered by caesarean section. Mothers with a first child in birth order and who had five and more children, as well as mothers who had more antenatal care visits and delivered babies in private hospitals showed a higher probability of caesarean section births.

Conclusions

The findings of the present study confirm the gradual upsurge in the percentage of mothers delivering by caesarean section during the past two decades in Pakistan. Against this backdrop, some measures need to be taken by health departments to regulate the number of caesarean deliveries. Awareness among women about pregnancy complications and elaborated details by gynaecologists about the medically indicated reasons for caesarean delivery are a few important steps in Pakistan that can help in reducing caesarean deliveries which are not medically indicated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Norheim OF, Jha P, Admasu K, Godal T, Hum RJ, Kruk ME, et al. Avoiding 40% of the premature deaths in each country, 2010–30: review of national mortality trends to help quantify the UN sustainable development goal for health. Lancet. 2015;385(9964):239–52.CrossRefPubMed Norheim OF, Jha P, Admasu K, Godal T, Hum RJ, Kruk ME, et al. Avoiding 40% of the premature deaths in each country, 2010–30: review of national mortality trends to help quantify the UN sustainable development goal for health. Lancet. 2015;385(9964):239–52.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bhutta ZA, Cabral S, Chan CW, Keenan WJ. Reducing maternal, newborn, and infant mortality globally: an integrated action agenda. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;119(Suppl. 1):S13–7. Bhutta ZA, Cabral S, Chan CW, Keenan WJ. Reducing maternal, newborn, and infant mortality globally: an integrated action agenda. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;119(Suppl. 1):S13–7.
3.
go back to reference Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS, Liston R, Kramer MS, Wen SW, et al. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(8):735–42.CrossRefPubMed Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS, Liston R, Kramer MS, Wen SW, et al. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(8):735–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Amjad A, Amjad U, Zakar R, Usman A, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. Factors associated with caesarean deliveries among child-bearing women in Pakistan: secondary analysis of data from the demographic and health survey, 2012–13. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:113. Amjad A, Amjad U, Zakar R, Usman A, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. Factors associated with caesarean deliveries among child-bearing women in Pakistan: secondary analysis of data from the demographic and health survey, 2012–13. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:113.
5.
go back to reference Niino Y. The increasing caesarean rate globally and what we can do about it. Biosci Trends. 2018;5(4):139–50.CrossRef Niino Y. The increasing caesarean rate globally and what we can do about it. Biosci Trends. 2018;5(4):139–50.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller AB, Barros AJ, Boerma T, et al. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low- and middle-income countries. BMJ. 2018;360:k55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller AB, Barros AJ, Boerma T, et al. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low- and middle-income countries. BMJ. 2018;360:k55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
8.
go back to reference Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, Azad T, et al. Relationship between caesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2263–70.CrossRefPubMed Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, Azad T, et al. Relationship between caesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2263–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizán JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Caesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study. Birth. 2006;33(4):270–7.CrossRefPubMed Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizán JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Caesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study. Birth. 2006;33(4):270–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The effect of caesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341–6.CrossRefPubMed Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The effect of caesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, Norman JE, McLernon DJ. Planned caesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2271–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, Norman JE, McLernon DJ. Planned caesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2271–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Penna L, Arulkumaran S. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82(3):399–409.CrossRef Penna L, Arulkumaran S. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82(3):399–409.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hildingsson I, Rådestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenström U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(6):618–23.CrossRef Hildingsson I, Rådestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenström U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(6):618–23.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective caesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29–30):489.PubMedPubMedCentral Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective caesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29–30):489.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Mumtaz S, Bahk J, Khang YH. Rising trends and inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: evidence from Pakistan demographic and health surveys, 1990-2013. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186563.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mumtaz S, Bahk J, Khang YH. Rising trends and inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: evidence from Pakistan demographic and health surveys, 1990-2013. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186563.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Hafeez M, Yasin A, Badar N, Pasha MI, Akram N, Gulzar B. Prevalence and indications of caesarean section in a teaching hospital. JIMSA. 2014;27:15–6. Hafeez M, Yasin A, Badar N, Pasha MI, Akram N, Gulzar B. Prevalence and indications of caesarean section in a teaching hospital. JIMSA. 2014;27:15–6.
17.
go back to reference Iftikhar T, Rizvi U, Ejaz L. Evaluation of causes of increasing caesarean section rate in tertiary care hospital. J Sheikh Zayed Med Coll. 2010;1:1. Iftikhar T, Rizvi U, Ejaz L. Evaluation of causes of increasing caesarean section rate in tertiary care hospital. J Sheikh Zayed Med Coll. 2010;1:1.
19.
go back to reference Bayrambour H, Heaman M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of caesarean birth: a systematic review. Birth. 2010;37(3):219–26.CrossRef Bayrambour H, Heaman M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of caesarean birth: a systematic review. Birth. 2010;37(3):219–26.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Carolan M, Davey M-A, Biro MA, Kealy M. Older maternal age and intervention in labor: a population-based study comparing older and younger first-time mothers in Victoria, Australia. Birth. 2011;38(1):24–9.CrossRefPubMed Carolan M, Davey M-A, Biro MA, Kealy M. Older maternal age and intervention in labor: a population-based study comparing older and younger first-time mothers in Victoria, Australia. Birth. 2011;38(1):24–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jahromi BN, Husseini Z. Pregnancy outcome at maternal age 40 and older. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;47(3):318–21.CrossRefPubMed Jahromi BN, Husseini Z. Pregnancy outcome at maternal age 40 and older. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;47(3):318–21.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hanif HM. Association between maternal age and pregnancy outcome: implications for the Pakistani society. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61:313–9.PubMed Hanif HM. Association between maternal age and pregnancy outcome: implications for the Pakistani society. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61:313–9.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lin HC, Sheen TC, Tang CH, Kao S. Association between maternal age and the likelihood of a caesarean section: a population-based multivariate logistic regression analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:1178–83.CrossRefPubMed Lin HC, Sheen TC, Tang CH, Kao S. Association between maternal age and the likelihood of a caesarean section: a population-based multivariate logistic regression analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:1178–83.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Padmadas SS, Suresh KS, Nair SB, Anitha Kumari KR. Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey. Soc Sci Medl Sci. 2000;519(4):511–2.CrossRef Padmadas SS, Suresh KS, Nair SB, Anitha Kumari KR. Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey. Soc Sci Medl Sci. 2000;519(4):511–2.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. Obesity, obstetric complications and caesarean delivery rate – a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1091–7.CrossRefPubMed Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. Obesity, obstetric complications and caesarean delivery rate – a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1091–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dražančić A. Antenatal care in developing countries. What should be done? J Perinat Med. 2001;29(3):188–98.CrossRefPubMed Dražančić A. Antenatal care in developing countries. What should be done? J Perinat Med. 2001;29(3):188–98.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Walker DS, McCully L, Vest V. Evidence-based prenatal care visits: when less is more. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2001;46(3):146–51.CrossRef Walker DS, McCully L, Vest V. Evidence-based prenatal care visits: when less is more. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2001;46(3):146–51.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Majrooh MA, Hasnain S, Akram J, Siddiqui A, Memon ZA. Coverage and quality of antenatal care provided at primary health care facilities in the ‘Punjab’ province of ‘Pakistan’. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113390.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Majrooh MA, Hasnain S, Akram J, Siddiqui A, Memon ZA. Coverage and quality of antenatal care provided at primary health care facilities in the ‘Punjab’ province of ‘Pakistan’. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113390.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Islam MT, Yoshimura Y. Rate of caesarean delivery at hospitals providing emergency obstetric care in Bangladesh. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;128(1):40–3.CrossRef Islam MT, Yoshimura Y. Rate of caesarean delivery at hospitals providing emergency obstetric care in Bangladesh. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;128(1):40–3.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kambo I, Bedi N, Dhillon BS, Saxena NC. A critical appraisal of caesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):151–8.CrossRef Kambo I, Bedi N, Dhillon BS, Saxena NC. A critical appraisal of caesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):151–8.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ronsmans C, Holtz S, Stanton C. Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2006;368(9546):1516–23.CrossRefPubMed Ronsmans C, Holtz S, Stanton C. Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2006;368(9546):1516–23.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98–108.CrossRefPubMed Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98–108.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of caesarean section births in private sector health facilities-analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:613. Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of caesarean section births in private sector health facilities-analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:613.
34.
go back to reference Malloy MH, Rhoads GG, Schramm W, Land G. Increasing caesarean section rates in very low – birth weight infants: effect on outcome. JAMA. 2009;262(11):1475–8.CrossRef Malloy MH, Rhoads GG, Schramm W, Land G. Increasing caesarean section rates in very low – birth weight infants: effect on outcome. JAMA. 2009;262(11):1475–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trends of caesarean section deliveries in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990–2018
Authors
Aaisha Amjad
Abeeha Imran
Nabeeha Shahram
Rubeena Zakar
Ahmed Usman
Muhammad Zakria Zakar
Florian Fischer
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03457-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue