Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Care | Research

Requirements analysis for an AI-based clinical decision support system for general practitioners: a user-centered design process

Authors: Dania Schütze, Svea Holtz, Michaela C. Neff, Susanne M. Köhler, Jannik Schaaf, Lena S. Frischen, Brita Sedlmayr, Beate S. Müller

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As the first point of contact for patients with health issues, general practitioners (GPs) are frequently confronted with patients presenting with non-specific symptoms of unclear origin. This can result in delayed, prolonged or false diagnoses. To accelerate and improve the diagnosis of diseases, clinical decision support systems would appear to be an appropriate tool. The objective of the project ‘Smart physician portal for patients with unclear disease’ (SATURN) is to employ a user-centered design process based on the requirements analysis presented in this paper to develop an artificial Intelligence (AI)-based diagnosis support system that specifically addresses the needs of German GPs.

Methods

Requirements analysis for a GP-specific diagnosis support system was conducted in an iterative process with five GPs. First, interviews were conducted to analyze current workflows and the use of digital applications in cases of diagnostic uncertainty (as-is situation). Second, we focused on collecting and prioritizing tasks to be performed by an ideal smart physician portal (to-be situation) in a workshop. We then developed a task model with corresponding user requirements.

Results

Numerous GP-specific user requirements were identified concerning the tasks and subtasks: performing data entry (open system, enter patient data), reviewing results (receiving and evaluating results), discussing results (with patients and colleagues), scheduling further diagnostic procedures, referring to specialists (select, contact, make appointments), and case closure. Suggested features particularly concerned the process of screening and assessing results: e.g., the system should focus more on atypical patterns of common diseases than on rare diseases only, display probabilities of differential diagnoses, ensure sources and results are transparent, and mark diagnoses that have already been ruled out. Moreover, establishing a means of using the platform to communicate with colleagues and transferring patient data directly from electronic patient records to the system was strongly recommended.

Conclusions

Essential user requirements to be considered in the development and design of a diagnosis system for primary care could be derived from the analysis. They form the basis for mockup-development and system engineering.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Guy J, Peters MG. Liver disease in women: the influence of gender on epidemiology, natural history, and patient outcomes. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;9:633–9. Guy J, Peters MG. Liver disease in women: the influence of gender on epidemiology, natural history, and patient outcomes. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;9:633–9.
11.
go back to reference Limb L, Nutt S, Sen A. Experiences of rare diseases: an insight from patients and families. 2010. Limb L, Nutt S, Sen A. Experiences of rare diseases: an insight from patients and families. 2010.
17.
go back to reference Sim I, Gorman P, Greenes RA, Hayney RB, Kaplan B, Lehmann H, Tang PC. Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:527–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sim I, Gorman P, Greenes RA, Hayney RB, Kaplan B, Lehmann H, Tang PC. Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:527–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference International Standards Organization. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction—Part 210: Human Centred Design for Interactive Systems, ISO 9241–210. 2010. International Standards Organization. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction—Part 210: Human Centred Design for Interactive Systems, ISO 9241–210. 2010.
26.
go back to reference UXQB e.V. CPUX-F Curriculum and Glossary. 1st ed. 2020. UXQB e.V. CPUX-F Curriculum and Glossary. 1st ed. 2020.
27.
go back to reference UXQB e.V. CPUX-UR Curriculum Certified Professional for Usability and User Experience – User Requirements Engineering. 3rd ed. 2023. UXQB e.V. CPUX-UR Curriculum Certified Professional for Usability and User Experience – User Requirements Engineering. 3rd ed. 2023.
28.
go back to reference Geis T, Tesch G. Basiswissen Usability und User Experience: Aus- und Weiterbildung zum UXQB® Certified Professional for Usability and User Experience (CPUX) - Foundation Level (CPUX-F). 1st ed. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag; 2019. Geis T, Tesch G. Basiswissen Usability und User Experience: Aus- und Weiterbildung zum UXQB® Certified Professional for Usability and User Experience (CPUX) - Foundation Level (CPUX-F). 1st ed. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag; 2019.
29.
go back to reference Geis T. Praxiswissen User Requirements: Nutzungsqualität systematisch, nachhaltig und agil in die Produktentwicklung integrieren: Aus- und Weiterbildung zum UXQB Certified Professional for Usability and User Experience - Advanced Level “User Requirements Engineering” (CPUX-UR). 1st ed. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag; 2018. Geis T. Praxiswissen User Requirements: Nutzungsqualität systematisch, nachhaltig und agil in die Produktentwicklung integrieren: Aus- und Weiterbildung zum UXQB Certified Professional for Usability and User Experience - Advanced Level “User Requirements Engineering” (CPUX-UR). 1st ed. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag; 2018.
30.
go back to reference Przyborski A, Wohlrab-Sahr M, editors. Qualitative Sozialforschung: De Gruyter; 2021. Przyborski A, Wohlrab-Sahr M, editors. Qualitative Sozialforschung: De Gruyter; 2021.
31.
go back to reference Unterauer M. Workshops im Requirements Engineering: Methoden, Checklisten und Best Practices für die Ermittlung von Anforderungen. 1st ed. Heidelberg: dpunkt-Verl; 2015. Unterauer M. Workshops im Requirements Engineering: Methoden, Checklisten und Best Practices für die Ermittlung von Anforderungen. 1st ed. Heidelberg: dpunkt-Verl; 2015.
36.
go back to reference Nielsen J, Landauer TK. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Arnold B, van der Veer G, White T, editors. the SIGCHI conference; 24.04.1993 - 29.04.1993; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 1993. p. 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169166. Nielsen J, Landauer TK. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Arnold B, van der Veer G, White T, editors. the SIGCHI conference; 24.04.1993 - 29.04.1993; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 1993. p. 206–213. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​169059.​169166.
37.
go back to reference Baxter K, Courage C, Caine K. Understanding your users: A practical guide to user research methods. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Morgan Kaufmann; 2015. Baxter K, Courage C, Caine K. Understanding your users: A practical guide to user research methods. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Morgan Kaufmann; 2015.
40.
go back to reference Lenzen-Schulte M. Mit einem Mausklick zur Diagnose. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2017;114. Lenzen-Schulte M. Mit einem Mausklick zur Diagnose. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2017;114.
46.
go back to reference Bertram O, Dorflinger S, Clin L, Polanc A, Koch R, Joos S, Thies C. Current State of Interoperability in German Practice Management Systems: Insights from the TeleDerm Project. In: 2018 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS); 18.06.2018 - 21.06.2018; Karlstad: IEEE; 2018. p. 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2018.00045. Bertram O, Dorflinger S, Clin L, Polanc A, Koch R, Joos S, Thies C. Current State of Interoperability in German Practice Management Systems: Insights from the TeleDerm Project. In: 2018 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS); 18.06.2018 - 21.06.2018; Karlstad: IEEE; 2018. p. 217–222. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​CBMS.​2018.​00045.
48.
Metadata
Title
Requirements analysis for an AI-based clinical decision support system for general practitioners: a user-centered design process
Authors
Dania Schütze
Svea Holtz
Michaela C. Neff
Susanne M. Köhler
Jannik Schaaf
Lena S. Frischen
Brita Sedlmayr
Beate S. Müller
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02245-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023 Go to the issue