Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire

Authors: Sara-Sadat Hoseini-Esfidarjani, Reza Negarandeh, Farzaneh Delavar, Leila Janani

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and objective

Access to health care is a universal concern. Therefore, this study was conducted to develop a questionnaire to assess the Perceived Access to Health care based on Penchansky and Thomas’s definition of access and the assessment of its psychometric properties.

Method

The initial questionnaire contains 31 items developed based on a deductive approach with an extensive review of the related literature. Content validity, face validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and instrument reliability were further examined. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 24, R software version 4, and lavaan package.

Results

The initial questionnaire was examined using qualitative content validity, and the necessary modifications were applied to each item. The content validity ratio (CVR) was approved in 30 items with a value greater than 0.78, and one item with a CVR value lower than 0.78 was removed. In the case of the content validity index (CVI), 29 items were approved with a CVI value of greater than 0.79, and one item with a CVI value between 0.70 and 0.79 was revised. In qualitative face validity, all items were approved by a panel of experts and the participants. All 30 items with an impact score index higher than 1.5 were approved for the next steps. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the six-factor model of access to health care has an appropriate fit. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was calculated 0.86. The value of Cronbach’s alpha for the dimensions of availability, accessibility, affordability, accommodation, acceptability, and awareness were 0.61, 0.76, 0.66, 0.60, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively. The Intraclass Correlation Index (ICC) value for reliability (test-retest) of the whole instrument was calculated 0.94 using the two-way mixed absolute agreement method.

Conclusion

The success of health programs depends on eliminating barriers to access to provided health care services. One of the most critical barriers to understanding access is a perception of limited access. This questionnaire might be used further to understand perceived health care access in different global contexts.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
\( CVR=\frac{\mathrm{ne}-N/2}{N/2} \)
 
2
impact score (frequency × Importance)
 
Literature
11.
go back to reference Julián Alfredo Fernández-Niño, Chavarro Lud Magdy, Vásquez-Rodríguez Ana Beatriz, et al. Perception of effective access to health services in Territorial Spaces for Training and Reincorporation, one year after the peace accords in Colombia: a cross-sectional study. F1000Research. 2019;8:2140. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21375.2 Julián Alfredo Fernández-Niño, Chavarro Lud Magdy, Vásquez-Rodríguez Ana Beatriz, et al. Perception of effective access to health services in Territorial Spaces for Training and Reincorporation, one year after the peace accords in Colombia: a cross-sectional study. F1000Research. 2019;8:2140. https://​doi.​org/​10.​12688/​f1000research.​21375.​2
14.
go back to reference Shrestha J. Evaluation of access to primary healthcare: a case study of Yogyakarta, Indonesia: [MSc thesis on the internet] University of Twente Faculty of geo-information and earth observation (ITC); 2010. Shrestha J. Evaluation of access to primary healthcare: a case study of Yogyakarta, Indonesia: [MSc thesis on the internet] University of Twente Faculty of geo-information and earth observation (ITC); 2010.
21.
go back to reference Quinn M, Claire R, Jane F, et al. Survey instruments to assess patient experiences with access and coordination across healthcare settings: available and needed measures. Med Care. 2017;55(Suppl 7 1):S84.CrossRef Quinn M, Claire R, Jane F, et al. Survey instruments to assess patient experiences with access and coordination across healthcare settings: available and needed measures. Med Care. 2017;55(Suppl 7 1):S84.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Daud KAM, Zulkarnaen KN, Rasdan IA, et al. Validity and reliability of instrument to measure social media skills among small and medium entrepreneurs at Pengkalan Datu River. Int J Dev Sustain. 2018;7(3):1026–37. Daud KAM, Zulkarnaen KN, Rasdan IA, et al. Validity and reliability of instrument to measure social media skills among small and medium entrepreneurs at Pengkalan Datu River. Int J Dev Sustain. 2018;7(3):1026–37.
28.
go back to reference Martin CR, Emily S-MG. A ‘good practice’guide for the reporting of design and analysis for psychometric evaluation. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013;31(5):449–55.CrossRef Martin CR, Emily S-MG. A ‘good practice’guide for the reporting of design and analysis for psychometric evaluation. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013;31(5):449–55.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire
Authors
Sara-Sadat Hoseini-Esfidarjani
Reza Negarandeh
Farzaneh Delavar
Leila Janani
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06655-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue