Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Surgery 5/2022

Open Access 10-06-2022 | Care | original article

Pilonidal sinus disease: a 25-year experience and long-term results of different surgical techniques

Authors: Maria Bubenova, M.D., Martina Mittlboeck, PhD, Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini, M.D., Bela Teleky, M.D., Enrico Cosentini, M.D.

Published in: European Surgery | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Summary

Background

The incidence of pilonidal disease is increasing. The choice of surgical approach differs between surgeons and countries. With better understanding of the etiology of the disease, there is a shift toward more successful concepts of treatment. In many cases, management can be challenging owing to the number of previous failed operations.

Objective

The aim of this retrospective single-center cohort study was to compare recurrence rates and postoperative wound complications between five treatment arms.

Methods

A total of 299 patients who underwent surgery for pilonidal disease between November 1994 and May 2019 were included. Primary endpoint was time to recurrence, secondary endpoint was wound care complication rate.

Results

Median follow-up was 85.8 months in 286 patients. An overall recurrence rate of 16.1% was observed at 24 months, 21.4% at 60 months, and 47.4% at 303 months; 24 months postoperatively, there was a range from 10.5% for excision with primary midline closure to 30.0% for the Bascom I procedure. Recurrence in excision with primary midline closure was 71.8% 268 months postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the five groups (p = 0.54). The highest prevalence of wound complications (46.3%) was in excision with midline closure. Cox regression showed that previous pilonidal operations are an independent prognostic factor for developing recurrence (p = 0.006). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that previous pilonidal operations have a significant predictive value for developing postoperative wound complications (odds ratio = 4.04, 95% confidence interval [1.61–10.18]; p = 0.003).

Conclusion

In order to improve surgical outcomes, emphasis should be given to adoption of techniques with high success rates.
Literature
9.
go back to reference Beal EM, Lee MJ, Hind D, et al. A systematic review of classification systems for pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(5):435–43.CrossRef Beal EM, Lee MJ, Hind D, et al. A systematic review of classification systems for pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(5):435–43.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pilonidal sinus disease: a 25-year experience and long-term results of different surgical techniques
Authors
Maria Bubenova, M.D.
Martina Mittlboeck, PhD
Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini, M.D.
Bela Teleky, M.D.
Enrico Cosentini, M.D.
Publication date
10-06-2022
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Keyword
Care
Published in
European Surgery / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Electronic ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-022-00767-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

European Surgery 5/2022 Go to the issue