Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research article

Negotiating commissioning pathways for the successful implementation of innovative health technology in primary care

Authors: Gregory Maniatopoulos, Shona Haining, John Allen, Scott Wilkes

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Commissioning innovative health technologies is typically complex and multi-faceted. Drawing on the negotiated order perspective, we explore the process by which commissioning organisations make their decisions to commission innovative health technologies. The empirical backdrop to this discussion is provided by a case study exploring the commissioning considerations for a new photoplethysmography-based diagnostic technology for peripheral arterial disease in primary care in the UK.

Methods

The research involved an empirical case study of four Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) involved in the commissioning of services in primary and secondary care. Semi-structured in-depth interviews (16 in total) and two focus groups (a total of eight people participated, four in each group) were conducted with key individuals involved in commissioning services in the NHS including (i) senior NHS clinical leaders and directors (ii) commissioners and health care managers across CCGs and (iii) local general practitioners.

Results

Commissioning of a new diagnostic technology for peripheral arterial disease in primary care involves high levels of protracted negotiations over funding between providers and commissioners, alliance building, conflict resolution and compromise of objectives where the outcomes of change are highly contingent upon interventions made across different care settings. Our evidence illustrates how reconfigurations of inter-organisational relations, and of clinical and related work practices required for the successful implementation of a new technology could become the major challenge in commissioning negotiations.

Conclusions

Innovative health technologies such as the diagnostic technology for peripheral arterial disease are commissioned in care pathways where the value of such technology is realised by those delivering care to patients. The detail of how care pathways are commissioned is complex and involves high degrees of uncertainty concerning such issues as prioritisation decisions, patient benefits, clinical buy-in, value for money and unintended consequences. Recent developments in the new care models and integrated care systems (ICSs) in the UK offer a unique opportunity for the successful commissioning arrangements of innovative health technologies in primary care such as the new diagnostic technology for peripheral arterial disease.
Literature
1.
Llewellyn S, Procter R, Harvey G, Maniatopoulos G, Boyd A. Facilitating technology adoption in the NHS: negotiating the organisational and policy context-a qualitative study. Health Services Deliv Res. 2014;2:23.
2.
Cookson R. Evidence based policy making in healthcare: what it is and what it means. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(2):118–21.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Speed E, Gabe J. The health and social care act for England 2012: the extension of ‘new professionalism. Crit Soc Policy. 2013;33(3):564–74.CrossRef
5.
Shaw S, Smith J, Porter A, Rosen R, Mays N. The work of commissioning: a multisite case study of healthcare commissioning in England’s NHS. BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003341.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Wye L, Brangan E, Cameron A, Gabbay H, Klein JH, Pope C. Evidence based policy making and the ‘art’ of commissioning – how English healthcare commissioners access and use information and academic research in ‘real life’ decision-making: an empirical qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Robinson S, Dickinson H, Durrington L. Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue? Reviewing the evidence on commissioning and health services. Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22:9–14.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Sheaff R, Chambers N, Charles N, Exworthy M, Mahon A, Byng R, Mannion R. How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:S8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Strauss A, Schatzman L, Ehrlich D, Bucher R, Sabshin M. The hospital and its negotiated order. In: Friedson E, editor. The Hospital in Modern Society. New York: Free Press; 1963.
10.
Strauss A. Negotiations: varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass; 1978.
11.
Robinson S, Dickinson H, Williams I, Freeman T, Rumbold B, Spence K. Setting priorities in health: a study of English primary care trusts. London: Nuffield Trust; 2011.
12.
Allen J, Oates CP, Lees TA, Murray A. Photoplethysmography detection of lower limb peripheral occlusive arterial disease: a comparison of pulse timing, amplitude and shape characteristics. Physiol Meas. 2005;26:811–21.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Allen J. Topical Review: Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007;28:R1–39.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Allen J, Overbeck K, Nath AF, Murray A, Stansby G. A prospective comparison of bilateral photoplethysmography versus the ankle-brachial pressure index for detecting and quantifying lower limb peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:794–802.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Doobay AV, Anand SS. Sensitivity and specificity of the ankle-brachial index to predict future cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(7):1463–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Matthews S, Smith P, Chadwick P, Smyth V. Implementing a community-based structured exercise programme for patients with peripheral arterial disease in conjunction with an existing cardiac rehabilitation service results in better outcomes. Brit J Diab. 2017;16:4. https://​doi.​org/​10.​15277/​bjd.​2016.​109.CrossRef
18.
19.
20.
Peach G, Griffin M, Jones KG, Thompson MM, Hinchliffe RJ. Diagnosis and management of peripheral arterial disease. BMJ. 2012;345:e5208.CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Diehm C, Schuster A, Allenberg JR, et al. High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and co-morbidity in 6880 primary care patients: cross-sectional study. Atherosclerosis. 2004;172:95–105.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Malden: Blackwell; 2006.CrossRef
24.
Maniatopoulos G, Le-Couteur A, Vale L, Colver A. Falling through the gaps: exploring the role of integrated commissioning in improving transition from children’s to adults’ services for young people with long-term health conditions in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018;23(2):107–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1998.
26.
27.
Maniatopoulos G, Procter R, Llewellyn S, Harvey G, Boyd A. Situating technological innovation in practice: reconfigurations in the adoption of a breast Cancer diagnostic technology. Soc Sci Med. 2015;131:98–106.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Robinson S, Williams I, Dickinson D, Freeman T, Rumbold B. Priority setting and rationing in healthcare: evidence from the English experience. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2386–93.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Hendy J, Barlow J. The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(3):348–55.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C. The (non) diffusion of innovations: the mediating role of professional groups. Acad Manage J. 2005;48:117–34.CrossRef
31.
Price A, Majeed A. Improving how secondary care and general practice in England work together: requirements in the NHS standard contract. J R Soc Med. 2018;111(2):42–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Farquhar MC, Barclay S, Earl H, Grande G, Emery J, Crawford R. Barriers to effective communication across the primary/secondary interface: examples from the ovarian cancer patient journey (a qualitative study). Eur J Cancer Care. 2005;14(4):359–66.CrossRef
33.
Hobbs FDR, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, Stevens S, Perera-Salazar R, Holt T. Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14. Lancet. 2016;387:2323–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Llewellyn S, Northcott D. The average hospital. Acc Organ Soc. 2005;30:555–83.CrossRef
35.
Llewellyn S. Purchasing power and polarized professionalism in British medicine. Account Audit Account J. 1997;10(1):31–59.CrossRef
36.
Department of Health. A simple guide to payment by results. Leeds: Department of Health; 2012.
37.
Checkland K, Harrison S, Snow S, Coleman A, McDermott I. Understanding the work done by NHS commissioning managers: an exploration of the microprocesses underlying day-to-day sensemaking in UK primary care organisations. J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(2):149–70.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Metadata
Title
Negotiating commissioning pathways for the successful implementation of innovative health technology in primary care
Authors
Gregory Maniatopoulos
Shona Haining
John Allen
Scott Wilkes
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4477-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Pharmacists expand access to reproductive heaLthcare: PEARL study protocol

Research article

Supporting respiratory patients in primary care: a qualitative insight from independent community pharmacists in London

Research article

Take -home naloxone rescue kits following heroin overdose in the emergency department to prevent opioid overdose related repeat emergency department visits, hospitalization and death- a pilot study

Research article

An exploration of workarounds and their perceived impact on antibiotic stewardship in the adult medical wards of a referral hospital in Malawi: a qualitative study

Research article

Primary healthcare and school health service utilisation by adolescents and young adults in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Research article

Qualitative outcomes of Clean Cut: implementation lessons from reducing surgical infections in Ethiopia