Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Care | Study protocol

Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology (PIKKO) – evaluation of a supportive care intervention for overall oncological patients. Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial

Authors: Nico Schneider, Anna Bäcker, Katja Brenk-Franz, Christian Keinki, Jutta Hübner, Florian Brandt, Geraldine von der Winkel, Lutz Hager, Bernhard Strauss, Uwe Altmann

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cancer patients have to undergo a difficult medical therapy and are also confronted with various psychological, social and economic problems. Support is available from many providers, but patients often gain no access to it. Accordingly, there is a need for a single point of contact that can provide advice, information and assistance. In the state of Saarland, Germany, a supportive new consulting and information path (PIKKO) for all types of cancer is currently evaluated by the German Cancer Society, the Cancer Society of the Saarland, three statutory health insurances and the Jena University Hospital. PIKKO is designed to improve quality of life, self-efficacy, health literacy and patient satisfaction and to reduce psychological distress, related health care costs and the days of inability to work. This methodical work presents the process and analysis planning of this evaluation.

Methods

The study population includes all cancer types, both new and existing diseases. PIKKO (with patient navigator, oncological knowledge database, specialized oncological counseling) is evaluated within a controlled, non-randomized, comparative, multicenter, longitudinal design. In addition to patient surveys, data from statutory health insurances and utilization data from the web database are collected, and interviews with patient navigators and doctors are carried out. Patients are assigned to a control (usual care) or an intervention group (u. c. + PIKKO). Primary outcome is the health related quality of life (SF-12) six months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy (GSE), psychological distress such as depression (PHQ-9) or anxiety (GAD-7), health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47) and patient satisfaction in health care (Qualiskope-A). Furthermore, the time course of direct costs of medical care (e.g. work disability days) and usage data of the intervention modules are analyzed. Among other statistical procedures, we use t-tests, univariate tests and growth curve models.

Discussion

If PIKKO proves to be effective, recommendations can be made to health organizations, which should lead to the concept being rolled out throughout Germany and included into oncological guidelines. We expect PIKKO to be a useful addition to usual cancer care, helping to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and reduce healthcare costs.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trial Register under DRKS00016703 (21.02.2019, the reason for the delay was the prioritization of the study management in the first year to establish the new approach into practice). https://​www.​drks.​de/​drks_​web/​navigate.​do?​navigationId=​trial.​HTML&​TRIAL_​ID=​DRKS00016703
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF. S3-Leitlinie Psychoonkologische Diagnostik, Beratung und Behandlung von erwachsenen Krebspatienten, Langversion 1.1 (AWMF-Registernummer: 032/051OL). 2014 Contract No.: AWMF-Registernummer: 032/051OL. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF. S3-Leitlinie Psychoonkologische Diagnostik, Beratung und Behandlung von erwachsenen Krebspatienten, Langversion 1.1 (AWMF-Registernummer: 032/051OL). 2014 Contract No.: AWMF-Registernummer: 032/051OL.
5.
go back to reference Gaisser A, Sonnet M, Weg-Remers S. Wo suchen und finden Krebspatienten verlässliche Informationen? Forum. 2016;31(1):53–8.CrossRef Gaisser A, Sonnet M, Weg-Remers S. Wo suchen und finden Krebspatienten verlässliche Informationen? Forum. 2016;31(1):53–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(4):761–72.PubMedCrossRef Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(4):761–72.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Keinki C, Zowalla R, Wiesner M, Koester MJ, Huebner J. Understandability of patient information booklets for patients with cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2016. Keinki C, Zowalla R, Wiesner M, Koester MJ, Huebner J. Understandability of patient information booklets for patients with cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2016.
9.
go back to reference Gaston CM, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(10):2252–64.PubMedCrossRef Gaston CM, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(10):2252–64.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Weis J, Giesler JM. Patientenkompetenz: Ein neues Konzept in der Onkologie. In: Bartsch HH, Weis J, editors. Gemeinsame Entscheidung in der Krebstherapie. Basel: Karger Publishers; 2004. p. 132–40.CrossRef Weis J, Giesler JM. Patientenkompetenz: Ein neues Konzept in der Onkologie. In: Bartsch HH, Weis J, editors. Gemeinsame Entscheidung in der Krebstherapie. Basel: Karger Publishers; 2004. p. 132–40.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ross L, Petersen MA, Johnsen AT, Lundstrom LH, Groenvold M. Cancer patients' evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study 'The Cancer Patient's World'. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):235–44.PubMedCrossRef Ross L, Petersen MA, Johnsen AT, Lundstrom LH, Groenvold M. Cancer patients' evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study 'The Cancer Patient's World'. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):235–44.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dilworth S, Higgins I, Parker V, Kelly B, Turner J. Patient and health professional's perceived barriers to the delivery of psychosocial care to adults with cancer: a systematic review. Psycho Oncol. 2014;23(6):601–12.CrossRef Dilworth S, Higgins I, Parker V, Kelly B, Turner J. Patient and health professional's perceived barriers to the delivery of psychosocial care to adults with cancer: a systematic review. Psycho Oncol. 2014;23(6):601–12.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mazor KM, Roblin DW, Greene SM, Lemay CA, Firneno CL, Calvi J, et al. Toward patient-centered cancer care: patient perceptions of problematic events, impact, and response. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15):1784–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mazor KM, Roblin DW, Greene SM, Lemay CA, Firneno CL, Calvi J, et al. Toward patient-centered cancer care: patient perceptions of problematic events, impact, and response. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15):1784–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Teupen S Ergebnisbericht Versorgung von Frauen und Männern mit und nach Brustkrebs. Patientenvertretung im Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss; 2014. Teupen S Ergebnisbericht Versorgung von Frauen und Männern mit und nach Brustkrebs. Patientenvertretung im Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Freeman HP, Rodriguez RL. History and principles of patient navigation. Cancer. 2011;117(15 Suppl):3539–42.PubMed Freeman HP, Rodriguez RL. History and principles of patient navigation. Cancer. 2011;117(15 Suppl):3539–42.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Robinson-White S, Conroy B, Slavish KH, Rosenzweig M. Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs. 2010;33(2):127–40.PubMedCrossRef Robinson-White S, Conroy B, Slavish KH, Rosenzweig M. Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs. 2010;33(2):127–40.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shejila C, Pai MS, Fernandes DJ. Oncology nurse navigator programme-a narrative review. NUJHS. 2015;5(1):103. Shejila C, Pai MS, Fernandes DJ. Oncology nurse navigator programme-a narrative review. NUJHS. 2015;5(1):103.
21.
go back to reference Fillion L, de Serres M, Cook S, Goupil RL, Bairati I, Doll R. Professional patient navigation in head and neck Cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2009;25(3):212–21.PubMedCrossRef Fillion L, de Serres M, Cook S, Goupil RL, Bairati I, Doll R. Professional patient navigation in head and neck Cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2009;25(3):212–21.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee T, Ko I, Lee I, Kim E, Shin M, Roh S, et al. Effects of nurse navigators on health outcomes of cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(5):376–84.PubMedCrossRef Lee T, Ko I, Lee I, Kim E, Shin M, Roh S, et al. Effects of nurse navigators on health outcomes of cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(5):376–84.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Swanson J, Koch L. The role of the oncology nurse navigator in distress management of adult inpatients with cancer: a retrospective study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(1):69–76.PubMedCrossRef Swanson J, Koch L. The role of the oncology nurse navigator in distress management of adult inpatients with cancer: a retrospective study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(1):69–76.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mertz BG, Dunn-Henriksen AK, Kroman N, Johansen C, Andersen KG, Andersson M, et al. The effects of individually tailored nurse navigation for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a randomized pilot study. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(12):1682–9.PubMedCrossRef Mertz BG, Dunn-Henriksen AK, Kroman N, Johansen C, Andersen KG, Andersson M, et al. The effects of individually tailored nurse navigation for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a randomized pilot study. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(12):1682–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Kim S. The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. J Urban Health. 2008;85(1):114–24.PubMedCrossRef Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Kim S. The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. J Urban Health. 2008;85(1):114–24.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference McBrien KA, Ivers N, Barnieh L, Bailey JJ, Lorenzetti DL, Nicholas D, et al. Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191980.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McBrien KA, Ivers N, Barnieh L, Bailey JJ, Lorenzetti DL, Nicholas D, et al. Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191980.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Handanweisungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1998. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Handanweisungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1998.
29.
go back to reference Bullinger M, Kohlmann T, Morfeld M, Böhmer S. Patientennahe Evaluation in der Rehabilitation: Eine Studie zur projektübergreifenden Standardisierung und Analyse von Prognose und Outcome-Kriterien. Abschlussbericht. Hamburg: Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg−Eppendorf; 2002. Bullinger M, Kohlmann T, Morfeld M, Böhmer S. Patientennahe Evaluation in der Rehabilitation: Eine Studie zur projektübergreifenden Standardisierung und Analyse von Prognose und Outcome-Kriterien. Abschlussbericht. Hamburg: Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg−Eppendorf; 2002.
30.
go back to reference Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.PubMedCrossRef Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Scrymgeour G, Forrest R, Marshall B. Implementing a continuity of Cancer care nursing role into a New Zealand primary health organisation - the patient's perspective. J Prim Health Care. 2013;5(4):322–9.PubMedCrossRef Scrymgeour G, Forrest R, Marshall B. Implementing a continuity of Cancer care nursing role into a New Zealand primary health organisation - the patient's perspective. J Prim Health Care. 2013;5(4):322–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Weis J, Honig K, Bergelt C, Faller H, Brechtel A, Hornemann B, et al. Psychosocial distress and utilization of professional psychological care in cancer patients: an observational study in National Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) in Germany. PsychoOncol. 2018;27(12):2847–54.CrossRef Weis J, Honig K, Bergelt C, Faller H, Brechtel A, Hornemann B, et al. Psychosocial distress and utilization of professional psychological care in cancer patients: an observational study in National Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) in Germany. PsychoOncol. 2018;27(12):2847–54.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Hinz A, Schumacher J, Albani C, Schmid G, Brähler E. Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Diagnostica. 2006;52(1):26–32.CrossRef Hinz A, Schumacher J, Albani C, Schmid G, Brähler E. Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Diagnostica. 2006;52(1):26–32.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Zipfel S, Herzog W. PHQ-D Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten - Manual Komplettversion und Kurzform. 2 ed. Karlsruhe: Pfizer; 2002. Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Zipfel S, Herzog W. PHQ-D Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten - Manual Komplettversion und Kurzform. 2 ed. Karlsruhe: Pfizer; 2002.
35.
go back to reference Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Gräfe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord. 2004;81(1):61–6.PubMedCrossRef Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Gräfe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord. 2004;81(1):61–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7.PubMedCrossRef Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, Brähler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, et al. Validation and standardization of the generalized anxiety disorder screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care. 2008;46(3):266–74.PubMedCrossRef Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, Brähler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, et al. Validation and standardization of the generalized anxiety disorder screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care. 2008;46(3):266–74.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference HLS-EU Consortium. Comparative Report Of Health Literacy In Eight EU Member States. The European Health Literacy Survey HLS-EU (second extended and revised version; date 22 Jul 2014). 2012. HLS-EU Consortium. Comparative Report Of Health Literacy In Eight EU Member States. The European Health Literacy Survey HLS-EU (second extended and revised version; date 22 Jul 2014). 2012.
40.
go back to reference Gericke CA, Schiffhorst G, Busse R, Häussler B. Ein valides Instrument zur Messung der Patientenzufriedenheit in ambulanter haus- und fachärztlicher Behandlung: das Qualiskope-A. Gesundheitswesen. 2004;66(11):723–31.PubMedCrossRef Gericke CA, Schiffhorst G, Busse R, Häussler B. Ein valides Instrument zur Messung der Patientenzufriedenheit in ambulanter haus- und fachärztlicher Behandlung: das Qualiskope-A. Gesundheitswesen. 2004;66(11):723–31.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.CrossRefPubMed Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Koch-Institut R, editor. Bericht zum Krebsgeschehen in Deutschland für 2016. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut; 2016. Koch-Institut R, editor. Bericht zum Krebsgeschehen in Deutschland für 2016. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut; 2016.
43.
go back to reference Statistisches Bundesamt, editor. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2018 - Deutschland und Internationales: Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis); 2018. Statistisches Bundesamt, editor. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2018 - Deutschland und Internationales: Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis); 2018.
45.
go back to reference Stekhoven DJ, Bühlmann P. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinform. 2012;28(1):112–8.CrossRef Stekhoven DJ, Bühlmann P. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinform. 2012;28(1):112–8.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Misztal M. Some remarks on the data imputation using “missForest” method. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica. 2013;285:169–79. Misztal M. Some remarks on the data imputation using “missForest” method. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica. 2013;285:169–79.
47.
go back to reference Waljee AK, Mukherjee A, Singal AG, Zhang Y, Warren J, Balis U, et al. Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicine. BMJ open. 2013;3(8). Waljee AK, Mukherjee A, Singal AG, Zhang Y, Warren J, Balis U, et al. Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicine. BMJ open. 2013;3(8).
48.
go back to reference MacNeil Vroomen J, Eekhout I, Dijkgraaf MG, van Hout H, de Rooij SE, Heymans MW, et al. Multiple imputation strategies for zero-inflated cost data in economic evaluations: which method works best? Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(8):939–50.PubMedCrossRef MacNeil Vroomen J, Eekhout I, Dijkgraaf MG, van Hout H, de Rooij SE, Heymans MW, et al. Multiple imputation strategies for zero-inflated cost data in economic evaluations: which method works best? Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(8):939–50.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Altmann U, Thielemann D, Zimmermann A, Steffanowski A, Bruckmeier E, Pfaffinger I, et al. Outpatient psychotherapy improves symptoms and reduces health care costs in regularly and prematurely terminated therapies. Front Psychol. 2018;9:748.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Altmann U, Thielemann D, Zimmermann A, Steffanowski A, Bruckmeier E, Pfaffinger I, et al. Outpatient psychotherapy improves symptoms and reduces health care costs in regularly and prematurely terminated therapies. Front Psychol. 2018;9:748.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Liebl P, Seilacher E, Koester MJ, Stellamanns J, Zell J, Hubner J. What cancer patients find in the internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information - analysis of information on German websites. Oncology research and treatment. 2015;38(5):212–8.PubMedCrossRef Liebl P, Seilacher E, Koester MJ, Stellamanns J, Zell J, Hubner J. What cancer patients find in the internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information - analysis of information on German websites. Oncology research and treatment. 2015;38(5):212–8.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Bohme C, von Osthoff MB, Frey K, Hubner J. Qualitative evaluation of mobile cancer apps with particular attention to the target group, content, and advertising 2018;144(1):173–181. Bohme C, von Osthoff MB, Frey K, Hubner J. Qualitative evaluation of mobile cancer apps with particular attention to the target group, content, and advertising 2018;144(1):173–181.
52.
go back to reference Bohme C, von Osthoff MB, Frey K, Hubner J. Development of a Rating Tool for Mobile Cancer Apps: Information Analysis and Formal and Content-Related Evaluation of Selected Cancer Apps 2019;34(1):105–110. Bohme C, von Osthoff MB, Frey K, Hubner J. Development of a Rating Tool for Mobile Cancer Apps: Information Analysis and Formal and Content-Related Evaluation of Selected Cancer Apps 2019;34(1):105–110.
53.
go back to reference Porzig R, Neugebauer S, Heckmann T, Adolf D, Kaskel P, Froster UG. Evaluation of a cancer patient navigation program ("Onkolotse") in terms of hospitalization rates, resource use and healthcare costs: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):413.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Porzig R, Neugebauer S, Heckmann T, Adolf D, Kaskel P, Froster UG. Evaluation of a cancer patient navigation program ("Onkolotse") in terms of hospitalization rates, resource use and healthcare costs: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):413.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Giesler J, Weis J, Schreib M, Eichhorn S, Kuhnt S, Faust T, et al. Ambulante psychoonkologische Versorgung durch Krebsberatungsstellen – Leistungsspektrum und Inanspruchnahme durch Patienten und Angehörige 2015;65(12):450–458. Giesler J, Weis J, Schreib M, Eichhorn S, Kuhnt S, Faust T, et al. Ambulante psychoonkologische Versorgung durch Krebsberatungsstellen – Leistungsspektrum und Inanspruchnahme durch Patienten und Angehörige 2015;65(12):450–458.
56.
go back to reference Rösler M, Helbig U, Schopperth T. Die Bedeutung der ambulanten psychosozialen Krebsberatung 2018;33(3):170–174. Rösler M, Helbig U, Schopperth T. Die Bedeutung der ambulanten psychosozialen Krebsberatung 2018;33(3):170–174.
58.
go back to reference Thoemmes F, Ong AD. A primer on inverse probability of treatment weighting and marginal structural models. Emerg Adulthood. 2016;4(1):40–59.CrossRef Thoemmes F, Ong AD. A primer on inverse probability of treatment weighting and marginal structural models. Emerg Adulthood. 2016;4(1):40–59.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Coffman DL, Zhong W. Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(4):642–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Coffman DL, Zhong W. Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(4):642–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology (PIKKO) – evaluation of a supportive care intervention for overall oncological patients. Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial
Authors
Nico Schneider
Anna Bäcker
Katja Brenk-Franz
Christian Keinki
Jutta Hübner
Florian Brandt
Geraldine von der Winkel
Lutz Hager
Bernhard Strauss
Uwe Altmann
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01002-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2020 Go to the issue