Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research

Overseeing health care facilities in Shanghai, China: regulatory regime, activities and challenges of the governmental regulatory system

Authors: Yizhong Zhou, Zechang Lu, Zhifeng Yang, Huidi Li, Yingyao Chen

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Government regulation has played a crucial role in ensuring the quality, safety and equity of health care. However, few empirical studies have investigated Chinese governmental oversight of health care facilities in terms of regulatory arrangements and approaches. This study aims to explore the regulatory regime and main activities within the health sector in Shanghai, a city featuring abundant health care resources and a complex medical system, to provide policy implications for better regulation and offer valuable reference for elsewhere in China and other developing countries.

Methods

We explored the structure and main activities of government regulation over health care facilities in Shanghai, compared it with the regulatory system in Hong Kong and Taipei through a literature review and analyzed the data on regulatory activities conducted by the local Health Supervision Agencies using descriptive statistical analysis. The data were collected from the Shanghai Statistical Yearbook 2014–2018 and the centralized data bank of the Shanghai Health Supervision Authority.

Results

Shanghai has established a unique governmental regulatory system compared to Hong Kong and Taipei. We found health care facilities in Shanghai underwent less frequent inspections between 2013 and 2017, as average annual inspections at individual facilities decreased from 3.8 to 2.7. The number of annual administrative penalties and notifications issued for accumulating points on local health care facilities’ violations decreased by 24.8 and 40.7%, respectively, and complaints against health care facilities decreased by 29.1% during the study period.

Conclusions

The local governmental regulatory system played a vital role in overseeing the health care facilities and ensuring their legal compliance by exerting the various regulatory activities. Both annual administrative penalties and notifications of accumulating points on local health care facilities’ violations decreased considerably, with complaints against health care facilities reducing. As our study identified significant challenges, including regulatory fragmentation and no risk-based approach used, we offer recommendations to develop new policies and establish new mechanisms for better regulation.
Literature
1.
Walshe K, Shortell SM. Social regulation of healthcare organizations in the United States: developing a framework for evaluation. Health Serv Manag Res. 2004;17:79–99.CrossRef
2.
Walshe K. Regulating Healthcare: A Prescription for Improvement? Maidenhead and Philadelphia: Open University Press; 2003.
3.
Field RI. Health care regulation in America: complexity, confrontation, and compromise. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef
4.
Busse R, Hafez-Afifi N, Harding A. Regulation of health services. In: Harding AL, Preker AS, editors. Private participation in health services. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2003. p. 219–334.
5.
Ayres I, Braithwaite J. Responsive regulation:transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
6.
Axelrad RAKL. Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism. 1st ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.
7.
Saltman RB, Busse R, Mossialos E. Balancing regulation and entrepreneurialism in Europe's health sector: theory and practice. In: Saltman RB, Busse R, Mossialos E, editors. Regulating entrepreneurial behaviour in European health care systems European observatory on health care systems series. Philadelphia: Open University Press; 2002. p. 1–52.
8.
The Interim Regulation on the Administration of Hospitals and Clinics. Natl Med J China. 1951;37:420–1.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Zhou Y. The measurement of legal compliance of medical facilities based on the health administrative regulatory data of Shanghai, Doctoral Dissertation. Shanghai: Fudan University, School of Public Health; 2016.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Liu J. Shanghai health care almanac 1998. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 1998.
23.
Liu J. Shanghai health care almanac 2002. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Press; 2002.
24.
25.
Wang Q, Wang S, Zong L, Zhang B, Liu F, Zhou B, Fan J, Cao W, Chen G. Analysis on health administrative penalties of medical practice in Shanghai between 2009 and 2013. Chin J Health Inspect. 2016;23:15–9.
26.
Da Q, Liu J. Health supervision and inspection. In: Health supervision. Shanghai: Fudan University Press; 2003.
27.
28.
Zhou Y, Tang Y. Supervision over the practice of medical institutions. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press; 2018.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Ge H, Yu S, Qian Y. Brief analysis of institutional innovation in applying cumulative points system on medical Institutions’ illegal conduct in Shanghai. Health Econ Res. 2010:46–8.
38.
39.
Feng Q. Applicability to cumulative points system on medical Institutions’ illegal conduct in Shanghai. Shanghai J Prev Med. 2010;22:266–7.
40.
41.
Jiang Y, Zhang F, Liu H. Research on the institutions of handling complaints in health supervision agencies. Chin J Health Inspect. 2014;21:339–41.
42.
Jiang Y. Research on complaints of health supervision in Shanghai: status and regulatory strategies, Thesis. Shangai: Fudan University, School of Public Health; 2011.
43.
Chen G, Wang S, Zhou B, Zhang B, Wang Q, Liu F, Zong L, Fan J, Cao W. Analysis on health administrative penalties in Shanghai between 2009 and 2013. Chin J Health Inspect. 2016;23:6–9.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
Zatkin S. A health plan's view of government regulation. Health affairs (Project Hope). 1997;16:33–5.CrossRef
55.
56.
57.
Walshe K. Regulating U.S. nursing homes: are we learning from experience? Health Aff. 2001;20:128–44.CrossRef
58.
Hampton P. Reducing administrative burdens:effective inspection and enforcement. London: HM Treasury; 2005.
59.
Almond P, Esbester M. Regulatory inspection and the changing legitimacy of health and safety. Regulation and Governance. 2018;12:46–63.CrossRef
60.
Adil M. Risk-based regulatory system and its effective use in health and social care. J R Soc Promot Health. 2008;128:196–201.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Singapore MoH. Circular on streamlining the licensing and inspection process to be implemented on 7 May 2018. Singapore: Ministry of Health in Singapore; 2018.
Metadata
Title
Overseeing health care facilities in Shanghai, China: regulatory regime, activities and challenges of the governmental regulatory system
Authors
Yizhong Zhou
Zechang Lu
Zhifeng Yang
Huidi Li
Yingyao Chen
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0979-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research

Measuring and explaining changing patterns of inequality in institutional deliveries between urban and rural women in Ghana: a decomposition analysis

Research

Social inequality in sexual and reproductive health in Ecuador: an analysis of gaps by levels of provincial poverty 2009–2015

Research

Health need assessment in an indigenous high-altitude population living on an island in Lake Titicaca, Perú

Research

Impact of out of pocket payments on financial risk protection indicators in a setting with no user fees: the case of Mauritius

Research

Long-term out of pocket expenditure of people with cancer: comparing health service cost and use for indigenous and non-indigenous people with cancer in Australia

Research

Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa