Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Care | Original Article

Cancer patients with fractures are rarely assessed or treated for osteoporosis: a population-based study

Authors: W. D. Leslie, B. Edwards, S. Al-Azazi, L. Yan, L. M. Lix, P. Czaykowski, H. Singh

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Among 4238 cancer and 16,418 cancer-free individuals with incident major non-traumatic fractures (hip, clinical vertebral, forearm, humerus), post-fracture osteoporosis care was equally poor for both groups, whether assessed from bone mineral density (BMD) testing, initiation of osteoporosis therapy or either intervention (BMD testing and/or osteoporosis therapy).

Introduction

Most individuals sustaining a fracture do not undergo evaluation and/or treatment for osteoporosis. Cancer survivors are at increased risk for osteoporosis and fracture. Whether cancer survivors experience a similar post-fracture “care gap” is unclear. Using population-based databases, we assessed whether cancer patients are evaluated and/or treated for osteoporosis after a major fracture.

Methods

From the Manitoba Cancer Registry, we identified cancer cases (first cancer diagnosis between 1987 and 2013) and cancer-free controls with incident major non-traumatic fractures (from provincial physician billing claims and hospitalization databases). The outcomes were performance of BMD testing (from the BMD Registry), initiation of osteoporosis therapy (from drug dispensation database) or either intervention (BMD testing and/or osteoporosis therapy) in the 12 months post-fracture.

Results

There were 4238 cancer and 16,418 cancer-free individuals who sustained a fracture after the index date (cancer diagnosis) and were followed for at least 1 year post-fracture. Subsequent BMD testing was performed in 11.0% of cancer cases versus 11.5% non-cancer controls (P = 0.43), osteoporosis treatment in 22.9% cancer cases versus 21.8% non-cancer controls (P = 0.15), and either testing or treatment in 28.9% cancer cases versus 28.4% non-cancer controls (P = 0.53). Predictors of BMD testing and/or initiation of therapy were similar for non-cancer and cancer patients. Post-fracture interventions were consistently used more frequently among women, older patients (age 50 years or older), those who sustained fractures in a later calendar period, and (for treatment) after vertebral fracture. Cancer-specific variables (cancer type, years from cancer diagnosis to fracture, specialty of care provider) showed only weak and inconsistent effects.

Conclusions

A large care gap exists among cancer patients who sustain a fracture, similar to the general population, whereby the evaluation or treatment for osteoporosis is seldom conducted. Care maps may need to be developed for cancer populations to improve post-fracture care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD (2019) Osteoporosis. Lancet. 393(10169):364–376CrossRef Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD (2019) Osteoporosis. Lancet. 393(10169):364–376CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Levis S, Theodore G (2012) Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of treatment to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis: update of the 2007 report. J Manag Care Pharm 18(4 Suppl B):S1–S15 discussion S3 Levis S, Theodore G (2012) Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of treatment to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis: update of the 2007 report. J Manag Care Pharm 18(4 Suppl B):S1–S15 discussion S3
3.
go back to reference Murad MH, Drake MT, Mullan RJ, Mauck KF, Stuart LM, Lane MA et al (2012) Clinical review. Comparative effectiveness of drug treatments to prevent fragility fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(6):1871–1880CrossRef Murad MH, Drake MT, Mullan RJ, Mauck KF, Stuart LM, Lane MA et al (2012) Clinical review. Comparative effectiveness of drug treatments to prevent fragility fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(6):1871–1880CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Saito T, Sterbenz JM, Malay S, Zhong L, MacEachern MP, Chung KC (2017) Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 28(12):3289–3300CrossRef Saito T, Sterbenz JM, Malay S, Zhong L, MacEachern MP, Chung KC (2017) Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 28(12):3289–3300CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 35(2):375–382CrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 35(2):375–382CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S et al (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ. 182(17):1864–1873CrossRef Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S et al (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ. 182(17):1864–1873CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY, Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Executive summary of European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY, Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Executive summary of European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019.
8.
go back to reference Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N et al (2017) UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 12(1):43CrossRef Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N et al (2017) UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 12(1):43CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S et al (2014) Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25(10):2359–2381CrossRef Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S et al (2014) Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25(10):2359–2381CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Little EA, Eccles MP (2010) A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis. Implement Sci 5:80CrossRef Little EA, Eccles MP (2010) A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis. Implement Sci 5:80CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Khosla S, Cauley JA, Compston J, Kiel DP, Rosen C, Saag KG et al (2017) Addressing the crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis: a path forward. J Bone Miner Res 32(3):424–430CrossRef Khosla S, Cauley JA, Compston J, Kiel DP, Rosen C, Saag KG et al (2017) Addressing the crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis: a path forward. J Bone Miner Res 32(3):424–430CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Conley RB, Adib G, Adler RA, Akesson KE, Alexander IM, Amenta KC et al (2020) Secondary fracture prevention: consensus clinical recommendations from a multistakeholder coalition. J Bone Miner Res 35(1):36–52CrossRef Conley RB, Adib G, Adler RA, Akesson KE, Alexander IM, Amenta KC et al (2020) Secondary fracture prevention: consensus clinical recommendations from a multistakeholder coalition. J Bone Miner Res 35(1):36–52CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, Kirshner J, Eastell R, Gagel R et al (2019) Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 37(31):2916–2946CrossRef Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, Kirshner J, Eastell R, Gagel R et al (2019) Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 37(31):2916–2946CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37(6 Suppl):JS10–JJS4PubMed Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37(6 Suppl):JS10–JJS4PubMed
15.
go back to reference Kozyrskyj AL, Mustard CA (1998) Validation of an electronic, population-based prescription database. Ann Pharmacother 32(11):1152–1157CrossRef Kozyrskyj AL, Mustard CA (1998) Validation of an electronic, population-based prescription database. Ann Pharmacother 32(11):1152–1157CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Metge C, Black C, Peterson S, Kozyrskyj AL (1999) The population's use of pharmaceuticals. Med Care 37(6 Suppl):JS42–JS59PubMed Metge C, Black C, Peterson S, Kozyrskyj AL (1999) The population's use of pharmaceuticals. Med Care 37(6 Suppl):JS42–JS59PubMed
17.
go back to reference Tucker T, Howe H, Weir H (1999) Certification for population-based cancer registries. J Reg Mgmt 26(1):24–27 Tucker T, Howe H, Weir H (1999) Certification for population-based cancer registries. J Reg Mgmt 26(1):24–27
18.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom 6(3):275–282CrossRef Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom 6(3):275–282CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Caetano PA, Macwilliam LR, Finlayson GS (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8(1):25–30CrossRef Leslie WD, Caetano PA, Macwilliam LR, Finlayson GS (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8(1):25–30CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lix LM, Azimaee M, Osman BA, Caetano P, Morin S, Metge C et al (2012) Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data. BMC Public Health 12:301CrossRef Lix LM, Azimaee M, Osman BA, Caetano P, Morin S, Metge C et al (2012) Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data. BMC Public Health 12:301CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Epp R, Alhrbi M, Ward L, Leslie WD (2018) Radiological validation of fracture definitions from administrative data. J Bone Miner Res 33(Supp 1):S275 Epp R, Alhrbi M, Ward L, Leslie WD (2018) Radiological validation of fracture definitions from administrative data. J Bone Miner Res 33(Supp 1):S275
23.
go back to reference O'Donnell S, Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System Osteoporosis Working G (2013) Use of administrative data for national surveillance of osteoporosis and related fractures in Canada: results from a feasibility study. Arch Osteoporos 8:143CrossRef O'Donnell S, Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System Osteoporosis Working G (2013) Use of administrative data for national surveillance of osteoporosis and related fractures in Canada: results from a feasibility study. Arch Osteoporos 8:143CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Taylor AJ, Matthews RS, Ray MN, Becker DJ, Gary LC et al (2009) "Pathologic" fractures: should these be included in epidemiologic studies of osteoporotic fractures? Osteoporos Int 20(11):1969–1972CrossRef Curtis JR, Taylor AJ, Matthews RS, Ray MN, Becker DJ, Gary LC et al (2009) "Pathologic" fractures: should these be included in epidemiologic studies of osteoporotic fractures? Osteoporos Int 20(11):1969–1972CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chateau D, Metge C, Prior H, Soodeen RA (2012) Learning from the census: the Socio-economic Factor Index (SEFI) and health outcomes in Manitoba. Can J Public Health 103(8 Suppl 2):S23–S27CrossRef Chateau D, Metge C, Prior H, Soodeen RA (2012) Learning from the census: the Socio-economic Factor Index (SEFI) and health outcomes in Manitoba. Can J Public Health 103(8 Suppl 2):S23–S27CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Damji AN, Bies K, Alibhai SM, Jones JM (2015) Bone health management in men undergoing ADT: examining enablers and barriers to care. Osteoporos Int 26(3):951–959CrossRef Damji AN, Bies K, Alibhai SM, Jones JM (2015) Bone health management in men undergoing ADT: examining enablers and barriers to care. Osteoporos Int 26(3):951–959CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Van Tongeren LS, Duncan GG, Kendler DL, Pai H (2009) Implementation of osteoporosis screening guidelines in prostate cancer patients on androgen ablation. J Clin Densitom 12(3):287–291CrossRef Van Tongeren LS, Duncan GG, Kendler DL, Pai H (2009) Implementation of osteoporosis screening guidelines in prostate cancer patients on androgen ablation. J Clin Densitom 12(3):287–291CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Demeter S, Reed M, Lix L, MacWilliam L, Leslie WD (2005) Socioeconomic status and the utilization of diagnostic imaging in an urban setting. CMAJ. 173(10):1173–1177CrossRef Demeter S, Reed M, Lix L, MacWilliam L, Leslie WD (2005) Socioeconomic status and the utilization of diagnostic imaging in an urban setting. CMAJ. 173(10):1173–1177CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Demeter S, Leslie WD, Lix L, MacWilliam L, Finlayson GS, Reed M (2007) The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density testing in a public health-care system. Osteoporos Int 18(2):153–158CrossRef Demeter S, Leslie WD, Lix L, MacWilliam L, Finlayson GS, Reed M (2007) The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density testing in a public health-care system. Osteoporos Int 18(2):153–158CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cancer patients with fractures are rarely assessed or treated for osteoporosis: a population-based study
Authors
W. D. Leslie
B. Edwards
S. Al-Azazi
L. Yan
L. M. Lix
P. Czaykowski
H. Singh
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05596-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Osteoporosis International 2/2021 Go to the issue