Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2020

01-06-2020 | Care | Original Research

Optimizing the use of point of care testing devices for screening patients

Authors: Elie Sarraf, Donald M. Mathews, Mitchell H. Tsai, Andrew J. Goodwin

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Point of Care Testing (POCT) devices are regularly used to improve clinical workflows in the hospital setting despite generally having inferior performance when compared to standardized laboratory analyzers. We describe a method to improve the efficacy of using a POCT device as a screening test when the laboratory values occur over a continuum and applied this methodology to the process of International Normalized Ratios (INR) screening on day of surgery. Following IRB approval, laboratory INR values on the day of surgery were extracted from the University of Vermont Medical Center operating room’s electronic health record. Two separate theoretical POCT device values were simulated from the performance characterized by two prior publications (Jacobson and Hur). The sensitivities and specificities of the two theoretical devices were calculated over a range of values, in order detect an INR value greater or equal than 1.5 and 1.8. Subsequently, the percentage of the population with an INR value over each threshold was also calculated. Laboratory data from March 2008 to December 2016 were collected, and 9320 discrete INR values were compiled ranging from 0.8 to > 20. Two POCT devices were simulated using that dataset. The sensitivities and specificities over a range of values were determined, and the optimal cutoff values were identified for each device separately. Calculating the sensitivities and specificities over a range of values can optimize the clinical efficacy of a POCT device. By optimizing the use of POCT devices, hospitals may be able to improve clinical processes and reduce costs.
Footnotes
1
The cost of use includes the acquisition cost, the disposable cost as well as personnel cost and training.
 
Literature
1.
4.
go back to reference Story DA, Morimatsu H, Egi M, Bellomo R. The effect of albumin concentration on plasma sodium and chloride measurements in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(4):893–7.CrossRef Story DA, Morimatsu H, Egi M, Bellomo R. The effect of albumin concentration on plasma sodium and chloride measurements in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(4):893–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:622–8.CrossRef Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:622–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Rowlingson JC, et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:64–101.CrossRef Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Rowlingson JC, et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:64–101.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):727–36.CrossRef Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):727–36.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jacobson AK. Warfarin monitoring: point-of-care INR testing limitations and interpretation of the prothrombin time. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008;25:10.CrossRef Jacobson AK. Warfarin monitoring: point-of-care INR testing limitations and interpretation of the prothrombin time. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008;25:10.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hur M, Kim H, Park CM, et al. Comparison of international normalized ratio measurement between CoaguChek XS Plus and STA-R coagulation analyzers. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:213109.PubMed Hur M, Kim H, Park CM, et al. Comparison of international normalized ratio measurement between CoaguChek XS Plus and STA-R coagulation analyzers. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:213109.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:77.CrossRef Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:77.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bickler PE, Feiner JR, Severinghaus JW. Effects of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy at low saturation. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:715–9.CrossRef Bickler PE, Feiner JR, Severinghaus JW. Effects of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy at low saturation. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:715–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. A framework for using CLSI documents to evaluate clinical laboratory measurement procedures. 2nd ed. CLSI report EP19-Ed2. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. A framework for using CLSI documents to evaluate clinical laboratory measurement procedures. 2nd ed. CLSI report EP19-Ed2. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.
15.
go back to reference Meier FA, Jones BA. Point-of-care testing error: sources and amplifiers, taxonomy, prevention strategies, and detection monitors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(10):1262–7.PubMed Meier FA, Jones BA. Point-of-care testing error: sources and amplifiers, taxonomy, prevention strategies, and detection monitors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(10):1262–7.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Optimizing the use of point of care testing devices for screening patients
Authors
Elie Sarraf
Donald M. Mathews
Mitchell H. Tsai
Andrew J. Goodwin
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00332-w

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2020 Go to the issue