Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2021

Open Access 01-02-2021 | Care | Review Paper

Metrology part 1: definition of quality criteria

Authors: Pierre Squara, Thomas W. L. Scheeren, Hollmann D. Aya, Jan Bakker, Maurizio Cecconi, Sharon Einav, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Xavier Monnet, Daniel A. Reuter, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Bernd Saugel

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Any measurement is always afflicted with some degree of uncertainty. A correct understanding of the different types of uncertainty, their naming, and their definition is of crucial importance for an appropriate use of measuring instruments. However, in perioperative and intensive care medicine, the metrological requirements for measuring instruments are poorly defined and often used spuriously. The correct use of metrological terms is also of crucial importance in validation studies. The European Union published a new directive on medical devices, mentioning that in the case of devices with a measuring function, the notified body is involved in all aspects relating to the conformity of the device with the metrological requirements. It is therefore the task of the scientific societies to establish the standards in their area of expertise. Adopting the same understandings and definitions among clinicians and scientists is obviously the first step. In this metrologic review (part 1), we list and explain the most important terms defined by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures regarding quantities and units, properties of measurements, devices for measurement, properties of measuring devices, and measurement standards, with specific examples from perioperative and intensive care medicine.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the council on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union. 2017. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/2745/oj. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the council on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union. 2017. http://​data.​europa.​eu/​eli/​reg/​2017/​2745/​oj.
4.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference BIPM's Member States. On the revision of the SI. Paris: International bureau for weight and measures (BIPM); 2018. BIPM's Member States. On the revision of the SI. Paris: International bureau for weight and measures (BIPM); 2018.
Metadata
Title
Metrology part 1: definition of quality criteria
Authors
Pierre Squara
Thomas W. L. Scheeren
Hollmann D. Aya
Jan Bakker
Maurizio Cecconi
Sharon Einav
Manu L. N. G. Malbrain
Xavier Monnet
Daniel A. Reuter
Iwan C. C. van der Horst
Bernd Saugel
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00494-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2021 Go to the issue