Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Care | Research article

Key characteristics and critical junctures for successful Interprofessional networks in healthcare – a case study

Authors: Shannon Sibbald, Karen Schouten, Kimia Sedig, Rachelle Maskell, Christopher Licskai

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of networks in healthcare has been steadily increasing over the past decade. Healthcare networks reduce fragmented care, support coordination amongst providers and patients, improve health system efficiencies, support better patient care and improve overall satisfaction of both patients and healthcare professionals. There has been little research to date on the implementation, development and use of small localized networks. This paper describes lessons learned from a successful small localized primary care network in Southwestern Ontario that developed and implemented a regional respiratory care program (The ARGI Respiratory Health Program - ARGI is a not-for-profit corporation leading the implementation and evaluation of a respiratory health program. Respiratory therapists (who have a certified respiratory educators designation), care for patients from all seven of the network’s FHTs. Patients rostered within the network of FHTs that have been diagnosed with a chronic respiratory disease are referred by their family physicians to the program. The RTs are integrated into the FHTs, and work in a triad along with patients and providers to educate and empower patients in self-management techniques, create exacerbation action plans, and act as a liaison between the patient’s care providers. ARGI uses an eTool designed specifically for use by the network to assist care delivery, choosing education topics, and outcome tracking. RTs are hired by ARGI and are contracted to the participating FHTs in the network.).

Methods

This study used an exploratory case study approach. Data from four participant groups was collected using focus groups, observations, interviews and document analysis to develop a rich understanding of the multiple perspectives associated with the network.

Results

This network’s success can be described by four characteristics (growth mindset and quality improvement focus; clear team roles that are strengths-based; shared leadership, shared success; and transparent communication); and five critical junctures (acknowledge a shared need; create a common vision that is flexible and adaptable depending on the context; facilitate empowerment; receive external validation; and demonstrate the impacts and success of their work).

Conclusions

Networks are used in healthcare to act as integrative, interdisciplinary tools to connect individuals with the aim of improving processes and outcomes. We have identified four general lessons to be learned from a successful small and localized network: importance of clear, flexible, and strengths-based roles; need for shared goals and vision; value of team support and empowerment; and commitment to feedback and evaluations. Insight from this study can be used to support the development and successful implementation of other similar locally developed networks.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Vision of Values of PCIC - Aspiration: To lead innovation in chronic disease prevention and management. To build a program exemplar for Chronic Disease prevention and management (CDPM) in primary care.
Shared Values: Patient-centred holistic care, strive for best patient care / best experience, proactive primary care upstream from acute care, pragmatic health system transformation, shared innovation / shared resource, research and robust program evaluation
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown BB, Patel C, McInnes E, Mays N, Young J, Haines M. The effectiveness of clinical networks in improving quality of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):360.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brown BB, Patel C, McInnes E, Mays N, Young J, Haines M. The effectiveness of clinical networks in improving quality of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):360.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Johansson B. Information technology and the viability of spatial networks. Pap Reg Sci. 2005;61(1):51–64.CrossRef Johansson B. Information technology and the viability of spatial networks. Pap Reg Sci. 2005;61(1):51–64.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Trust T, Krutka DG, Carpenter JP. “Together we are better”: professional learning networks for teachers. Comput Educ. 2016;102:15–34.CrossRef Trust T, Krutka DG, Carpenter JP. “Together we are better”: professional learning networks for teachers. Comput Educ. 2016;102:15–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Heijmans N, van Lieshout J, Wensing M. Social networks of health care providers and patients in cardiovascular risk management: a study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):265.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Heijmans N, van Lieshout J, Wensing M. Social networks of health care providers and patients in cardiovascular risk management: a study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):265.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Net benefits: assessing the effectiveness of clinical networks in Australia through qualitative methods. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):108.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Net benefits: assessing the effectiveness of clinical networks in Australia through qualitative methods. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):108.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference McInnes E, Middleton S, Gardner G, Haines M, Haertsch M, Paul CL, et al. A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McInnes E, Middleton S, Gardner G, Haines M, Haertsch M, Paul CL, et al. A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pereira J, Heidebrecht C, Quach S, Quan S, Finkelstein M, Bettinger J, et al. Influenza immunization data: can we make order out of Chaos? Healthc Q. 2011;14(4):6–7.PubMedCrossRef Pereira J, Heidebrecht C, Quach S, Quan S, Finkelstein M, Bettinger J, et al. Influenza immunization data: can we make order out of Chaos? Healthc Q. 2011;14(4):6–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nicholson K, Randhawa J, Steele M. Establishing the SouthWestern academic health Network (SWAHN): a survey exploring the needs of academic and community networks in SouthWestern Ontario. J Community Health. 2015;40(5):927–39.PubMedCrossRef Nicholson K, Randhawa J, Steele M. Establishing the SouthWestern academic health Network (SWAHN): a survey exploring the needs of academic and community networks in SouthWestern Ontario. J Community Health. 2015;40(5):927–39.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Clements D, Dault M, Priest A. Effective Teamwork in Healthcare: Research and Reality. Healthc Pap. 2007;7(sp):26–34.PubMedCrossRef Clements D, Dault M, Priest A. Effective Teamwork in Healthcare: Research and Reality. Healthc Pap. 2007;7(sp):26–34.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hutchison B, Levesque J-F, Strumpf E, Coyle N. Primary health Care in Canada: Systems in Motion: primary health Care in Canada: Systems in Motion. Milbank Q. 2011;89(2):256–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hutchison B, Levesque J-F, Strumpf E, Coyle N. Primary health Care in Canada: Systems in Motion: primary health Care in Canada: Systems in Motion. Milbank Q. 2011;89(2):256–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research—“blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007;297(4):403.PubMedCrossRef Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research—“blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007;297(4):403.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ferrone M, Masciantonio MG, Malus N, Stitt L, O’Callahan T, Roberts Z, et al. The impact of integrated disease management in high-risk COPD patients in primary care. Npj Prim Care Respir Med. 2019;29(1):8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ferrone M, Masciantonio MG, Malus N, Stitt L, O’Callahan T, Roberts Z, et al. The impact of integrated disease management in high-risk COPD patients in primary care. Npj Prim Care Respir Med. 2019;29(1):8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside J, McLeod CB, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision-makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81:221–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside J, McLeod CB, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision-makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81:221–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002. p. 170. (Applied social research methods series). Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002. p. 170. (Applied social research methods series).
23.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. SAGE: Los Angeles; 2014. p. 282. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. SAGE: Los Angeles; 2014. p. 282.
24.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-5025. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1748-5908-4-5025.
25.
go back to reference Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study: qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405.CrossRefPubMed Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study: qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837–51.CrossRef Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837–51.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Haines M, Brown B, Craig J, D’Este C, Elliott E, Klineberg E, et al. Determinants of successful clinical networks: the conceptual framework and study protocol. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Haines M, Brown B, Craig J, D’Este C, Elliott E, Klineberg E, et al. Determinants of successful clinical networks: the conceptual framework and study protocol. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Caldwell DF, O’Reilly CA. The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations: the role of social influence. Small Group Res. 2003;34(4):497–517.CrossRef Caldwell DF, O’Reilly CA. The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations: the role of social influence. Small Group Res. 2003;34(4):497–517.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N. Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2017;27(3):521–35.CrossRef Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N. Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2017;27(3):521–35.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schulte M, Cohen NA, Klein KJ. The coevolution of Network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organ Sci. 2012;23(2):564–81.CrossRef Schulte M, Cohen NA, Klein KJ. The coevolution of Network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organ Sci. 2012;23(2):564–81.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Anderson NR, West MA. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav. 1998;19(3):235–58.CrossRef Anderson NR, West MA. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav. 1998;19(3):235–58.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Evans JM, Ross BG. Shared mental models of integrated care: aligning multiple stakeholder perspectives. Wistow G, editor. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(6):713–36.PubMedCrossRef Evans JM, Ross BG. Shared mental models of integrated care: aligning multiple stakeholder perspectives. Wistow G, editor. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(6):713–36.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Daniels N, Sabin JE. Accountability for reasonableness: an update. BMJ. 2008;9:337. Daniels N, Sabin JE. Accountability for reasonableness: an update. BMJ. 2008;9:337.
38.
go back to reference Allender S, Nichols M, Foulkes C, Reynolds R, Waters E, King L, et al. The development of a network for community-based obesity prevention: the CO-OPS collaboration. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):132.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Allender S, Nichols M, Foulkes C, Reynolds R, Waters E, King L, et al. The development of a network for community-based obesity prevention: the CO-OPS collaboration. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):132.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference McKellar KA, Pitzul KB, Yi JY, Cole DC. Evaluating communities of practice and knowledge networks: a systematic scoping review of evaluation frameworks. EcoHealth. 2014;11(3):383–99.PubMedCrossRef McKellar KA, Pitzul KB, Yi JY, Cole DC. Evaluating communities of practice and knowledge networks: a systematic scoping review of evaluation frameworks. EcoHealth. 2014;11(3):383–99.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Key characteristics and critical junctures for successful Interprofessional networks in healthcare – a case study
Authors
Shannon Sibbald
Karen Schouten
Kimia Sedig
Rachelle Maskell
Christopher Licskai
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05565-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Health Services Research 1/2020 Go to the issue