Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

It’s a small bit of advice, but actually on the day, made such a difference…: perceptions of quality in abortion care in England and Wales

Authors: Katherine C. Whitehouse, Rebecca Blaylock, Shelly Makleff, Patricia A. Lohr

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Quality of care (QOC) is increasingly identified as an important contributor to healthcare outcomes, however little agreement exists on what constitutes quality in abortion care or the recommended indicators from the service-user perspective. Our study aimed to explore perceptions and experiences of abortion QOC in England and Wales.

Methods

We performed in-depth interviews (via phone or in-person) with participants who had an abortion at a nationwide independent sector provider in the previous 6 months. We explored their experiences of the abortion service at each point in the care pathway, their perspectives on what contributed to and detracted from the experience meeting their definitions of quality, and their reflections on different aspects of QOC. We used content analysis to generate themes.

Results

From December 2018 to July 2019, we conducted 24 interviews. Ten participants had a surgical and 14 had a medical abortion. Seventeen (71%) were treated in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and 7 (29%) beyond that, with an average gestational age of 10 weeks + 5 days (range 5–23 + 6). We identified 4 major themes that contributed to participant’s perception of high quality care: (1) interpersonal interactions with staff or other patients, (2) being informed and prepared, (3) participation and choices in care and (4) accessibility. Nearly all participants identified interpersonal interactions with staff as an important contributor to quality with positive interactions often cited as the best part of their abortion experience and negative interactions as the worst. For information and preparation, participant described not only the importance of being well prepared, but how incongruencies between information and the actual experience detracted from quality. Participants said that making choices about their care, for example, method of abortion, was a positive contributor. Finally, participants identified access to care, specifically in relation to waiting times and travel, as an important aspect of QOC.

Conclusions

Participants situated quality in abortion care in 4 domains: interpersonal aspects of care, information and preparation, choices, and accessibility. Indicators identified can be used to develop standard metrics to ensure care meets service-user needs.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sudhinaraset M, Afulani P, Diamond-Smith N, Bhattacharyya S, Donnay F, Montagu D. Advancing a conceptual model to improve maternal health quality: the person-centered care framework for reproductive health equity. Gates Open Res. 2017;1(May):1–15.CrossRef Sudhinaraset M, Afulani P, Diamond-Smith N, Bhattacharyya S, Donnay F, Montagu D. Advancing a conceptual model to improve maternal health quality: the person-centered care framework for reproductive health equity. Gates Open Res. 2017;1(May):1–15.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jain AK, Hardee K. Revising the FP Quality of Care Framework in the Context of Rights-based Family Planning. Vol. 49, Studies in Family Planning. 2018. pp. 171–9. Jain AK, Hardee K. Revising the FP Quality of Care Framework in the Context of Rights-based Family Planning. Vol. 49, Studies in Family Planning. 2018. pp. 171–9.
4.
go back to reference Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990;21(2):61–91.CrossRef Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990;21(2):61–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dennis A, Blanchard K, Bessenaar T. Identifying indicators for quality abortion care: a systematic literature review. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2017;43(1):7–15.CrossRef Dennis A, Blanchard K, Bessenaar T. Identifying indicators for quality abortion care: a systematic literature review. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2017;43(1):7–15.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Abortion Service Quality Initiative. What is the ASQ Initiative? Abortion Service Quality Initiative. What is the ASQ Initiative?
7.
go back to reference Care Quality Commission. Inspection framework: independent acute hospitals. 2016. Care Quality Commission. Inspection framework: independent acute hospitals. 2016.
10.
go back to reference NICE. Abortion care: Quality standard [QS199]. 2021 NICE. Abortion care: Quality standard [QS199]. 2021
11.
go back to reference Heller R, Purcell C, Mackay L, Caird L, Cameron ST. Barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy in a remote and rural setting: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2016;123(10):1684–91.CrossRef Heller R, Purcell C, Mackay L, Caird L, Cameron ST. Barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy in a remote and rural setting: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2016;123(10):1684–91.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Purcell C, Cameron S, Caird L, Flett G, Laird G, Melville C, et al. Access to and experience of later abortion: accounts from women in Scotland. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46(2):101–8.CrossRef Purcell C, Cameron S, Caird L, Flett G, Laird G, Melville C, et al. Access to and experience of later abortion: accounts from women in Scotland. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46(2):101–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Myers AJ, Lohr PA, Pfeffer N. Disposal of fetal tissue following elective abortion: what women think. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2015;41(2):84–9.CrossRef Myers AJ, Lohr PA, Pfeffer N. Disposal of fetal tissue following elective abortion: what women think. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2015;41(2):84–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Slade P, Heke S, Fletcher J, Stewart P. Termination of pregnancy: patients’ perceptions of care. J Fam Plan Reprod Health. 2001;27(2):72–7.CrossRef Slade P, Heke S, Fletcher J, Stewart P. Termination of pregnancy: patients’ perceptions of care. J Fam Plan Reprod Health. 2001;27(2):72–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Purcell C, Cameron S, Lawton J, Glasier A, Harden J. Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women’s experiences. BJOG. 2017;124(13):2001–8.CrossRef Purcell C, Cameron S, Lawton J, Glasier A, Harden J. Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women’s experiences. BJOG. 2017;124(13):2001–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dedoose Version 8.0.35. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC; 2018. Dedoose Version 8.0.35. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC; 2018.
18.
go back to reference Makleff S, Wilkins R, Wachsmann H, Gupta D, Wachira M, Bunde W, et al. Exploring stigma and social norms in women’s abortion experiences and their expectations of care. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27(3):1661753.PubMed Makleff S, Wilkins R, Wachsmann H, Gupta D, Wachira M, Bunde W, et al. Exploring stigma and social norms in women’s abortion experiences and their expectations of care. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27(3):1661753.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lord J. Quality and abortion services. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2017;43(1):16.CrossRef Lord J. Quality and abortion services. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2017;43(1):16.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Becker D, Díaz-Olavarrieta C, Juárez C, García SG, Sanhueza P, Harper CC. Clients’ perceptions of the quality of care in Mexico City’s public-sector legal abortion program. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;37(4):191–201.CrossRef Becker D, Díaz-Olavarrieta C, Juárez C, García SG, Sanhueza P, Harper CC. Clients’ perceptions of the quality of care in Mexico City’s public-sector legal abortion program. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;37(4):191–201.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Andersson IM, Christensson K, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Experiences, feelings and thoughts of women undergoing second trimester medical termination of pregnancy. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):1–22. Andersson IM, Christensson K, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Experiences, feelings and thoughts of women undergoing second trimester medical termination of pregnancy. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):1–22.
24.
go back to reference Mossie Chekol B, Abera Abdi D, Andualem AT. Dimensions of patient satisfaction with comprehensive abortion care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):1–10.CrossRef Mossie Chekol B, Abera Abdi D, Andualem AT. Dimensions of patient satisfaction with comprehensive abortion care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):1–10.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Batya E. Assessments of the importance of provider characteristics for abortion care: data from women in Rajasthan, India. Health Care Women Int. 2011;32(1):72–95. Batya E. Assessments of the importance of provider characteristics for abortion care: data from women in Rajasthan, India. Health Care Women Int. 2011;32(1):72–95.
26.
go back to reference Nguyễn MH, Gammeltoft T, Rasch V. Situation analysis of quality of abortion care in the Main Maternity Hospital in Ha{hook above}i Phòng. Viet Nam Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(29):172–82.CrossRef Nguyễn MH, Gammeltoft T, Rasch V. Situation analysis of quality of abortion care in the Main Maternity Hospital in Ha{hook above}i Phòng. Viet Nam Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(29):172–82.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Patel S, Pelletier-Bui A, Smith S, Roberts MB, Kilgannon H, Trzeciak S, et al. Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0221412–e0221412.CrossRef Patel S, Pelletier-Bui A, Smith S, Roberts MB, Kilgannon H, Trzeciak S, et al. Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0221412–e0221412.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Patel RS, Bachu R, Adikey A, Malik M, Shah M. Factors related to physician burnout and its consequences: a review. Behav Sci (Basel, Switzerland). 2018;8(11):98. Patel RS, Bachu R, Adikey A, Malik M, Shah M. Factors related to physician burnout and its consequences: a review. Behav Sci (Basel, Switzerland). 2018;8(11):98.
29.
go back to reference Tawfik DS, Scheid A, Profit J, Shanafelt T, Trockel M, Adair KC, et al. Evidence relating health care provider burnout and quality of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(8):555–67.CrossRef Tawfik DS, Scheid A, Profit J, Shanafelt T, Trockel M, Adair KC, et al. Evidence relating health care provider burnout and quality of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(8):555–67.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference American College of Physicians. Top 10 Culture Change Interventions to Reduce Burnout and Improve Physician Well-being. American College of Physicians. Top 10 Culture Change Interventions to Reduce Burnout and Improve Physician Well-being.
31.
go back to reference Billing K, Newland H, Selva D. Improving patient satisfaction through information provision. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35(5):439–47.CrossRef Billing K, Newland H, Selva D. Improving patient satisfaction through information provision. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35(5):439–47.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(4):761–72.CrossRef Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(4):761–72.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Blaylock R, Makleff S, Whitehouse KC, Lohr PA. Patient perspectives on choice of abortion method: a secondary analysis of a qualitative study. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Blaylock R, Makleff S, Whitehouse KC, Lohr PA. Patient perspectives on choice of abortion method: a secondary analysis of a qualitative study. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021
34.
go back to reference Georgsson S, Krautmeyer S, Sundqvist E, Carlsson T. Abortion-related worries, fears and preparedness: a Swedish Web-based exploratory and retrospective qualitative study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019;24(5):380–9.CrossRef Georgsson S, Krautmeyer S, Sundqvist E, Carlsson T. Abortion-related worries, fears and preparedness: a Swedish Web-based exploratory and retrospective qualitative study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019;24(5):380–9.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Howie FL, Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial. BJOG. 1997;104(7):829–33.CrossRef Howie FL, Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial. BJOG. 1997;104(7):829–33.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Slade P, Heke S, Fletcher J, Stewart P. A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care. BJOG. 1998;105(12):1288–95.CrossRef Slade P, Heke S, Fletcher J, Stewart P. A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care. BJOG. 1998;105(12):1288–95.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: Women’s preferences and acceptability of treatment. Br Med J. 1993;307(6906):714–7.CrossRef Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: Women’s preferences and acceptability of treatment. Br Med J. 1993;307(6906):714–7.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Creinin MD. Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion. Contraception. 2000;62(3):117–24.CrossRef Creinin MD. Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion. Contraception. 2000;62(3):117–24.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Ashok PW, Hamoda H, Flett GMM, Kidd A, Fitzmaurice A, Templeton A. Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10–13 weeks gestation. Contraception. 2005;71(2):143–8.CrossRef Ashok PW, Hamoda H, Flett GMM, Kidd A, Fitzmaurice A, Templeton A. Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10–13 weeks gestation. Contraception. 2005;71(2):143–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Wingo E, Ralph LJ, Kaller S, Biggs MA. Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care. Contraception. 2021;103(4):269–75.CrossRef Wingo E, Ralph LJ, Kaller S, Biggs MA. Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care. Contraception. 2021;103(4):269–75.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Gerdts C, DeZordo S, Mishtal J, Barr-Walker J, Lohr PA. Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(5):401–7.CrossRef Gerdts C, DeZordo S, Mishtal J, Barr-Walker J, Lohr PA. Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(5):401–7.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Baum SE, White K, Hopkins K, Potter JE, Grossman D. Women’s experience obtaining abortion care in Texas after implementation of restrictive abortion laws: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0165048.CrossRef Baum SE, White K, Hopkins K, Potter JE, Grossman D. Women’s experience obtaining abortion care in Texas after implementation of restrictive abortion laws: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0165048.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference White K, Baum SE, Hopkins K, Potter JE, Grossman D. Change in second-trimester abortion after implementation of a restrictive state law. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(4):771–9.CrossRef White K, Baum SE, Hopkins K, Potter JE, Grossman D. Change in second-trimester abortion after implementation of a restrictive state law. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(4):771–9.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Malatzky C, Hulme A. ‘I love my job…it’s more the systems that we work in’: the challenges encountered by rural sexual and reproductive health practitioners and implications for access to care. Cult Health Sex. 2021 Malatzky C, Hulme A. ‘I love my job…it’s more the systems that we work in’: the challenges encountered by rural sexual and reproductive health practitioners and implications for access to care. Cult Health Sex. 2021
46.
go back to reference Solazzo AL. Different and not equal: the uneven association of race, poverty, and abortion laws on abortion timing. Soc Probl. 2018;66(4):519–47.CrossRef Solazzo AL. Different and not equal: the uneven association of race, poverty, and abortion laws on abortion timing. Soc Probl. 2018;66(4):519–47.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Baird B, Millar E. Abortion at the edges: politics, practices, performances. Womens Stud Int Forum. 2020;80:1–12.CrossRef Baird B, Millar E. Abortion at the edges: politics, practices, performances. Womens Stud Int Forum. 2020;80:1–12.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Darney BG, Powell B, Andersen K, Baum SE, Blanchard K, Gerdts C, et al. Quality of care and abortion: beyond safety. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018;44(3):159–60.CrossRef Darney BG, Powell B, Andersen K, Baum SE, Blanchard K, Gerdts C, et al. Quality of care and abortion: beyond safety. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018;44(3):159–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
It’s a small bit of advice, but actually on the day, made such a difference…: perceptions of quality in abortion care in England and Wales
Authors
Katherine C. Whitehouse
Rebecca Blaylock
Shelly Makleff
Patricia A. Lohr
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01270-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Reproductive Health 1/2021 Go to the issue