Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2021

01-08-2021 | Care

Individualized Care: Perceptions of Gynecologic Oncology Patients and Nurses

Authors: Esra Bukecık, Fusun Terzioglu

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of the descriptive study was to assess the individualized care perceptions of gynecologic oncology patients and nurses. The study was conducted between June 1, 2015, and September 30, 2015, at a university hospital and at a training and research hospital in Ankara, Turkey. The study sample included 152 patients who received inpatient treatment at the selected hospitals’ gynecologic oncology clinics, and 29 nurses are working at these clinics. The number of the patients was determined by using One-Sample t-Test Power Analysis. The questionnaire was filled by the researcher using face-to-face interview method. The data were analyzed by using Independent Samples t Test, the Mann-Whitney U test, ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to determine whether distribution of the parameters was normal. Patients’ perception on “nurses support their individuality” was found to be  = 3.07 ± 0.97 and their perception on “nurses provide individual care” was  = 2.33 ± 0.69. As patients’ perception on “nurses support their individuality” increased, their perception on “nurses provide individual care service” also increased (r = 0.736; p = 0.001). The patients’ satisfaction with care was at a moderate level (63.16 ± 14.97). The level of perception on “nurses support the individuality of patients during care practices (X̅ = 1.65 ± 0.58) and provide individual care service to the patients ( = 1.61 ± 0.62)” was low. Nurses stating that they supported the individuality of patients provided individual care to their patients (r = 0.828; p = 0.001). The nurses’ perception on “they support patients’ individuality” and “they provide individual care service” was lower than patients’ perception on “nurses support their individuality” and “nurses provide individual care.” The nurses’ job satisfaction (general satisfaction) was at a moderate level (3.08). In this study, nurses’ perception on individualized care was lower than patients’ perception.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McCallum M, Jolicoeur L, Lefebvre M, Babchishin L.K, Robert-Chauret S, Le T, and Lebel S. 2014. Supportive care needs after gynecologic cancer: where does sexual health fit in? Oncol Nurs Forum 41: 297–306 McCallum M, Jolicoeur L, Lefebvre M, Babchishin L.K, Robert-Chauret S, Le T, and Lebel S. 2014. Supportive care needs after gynecologic cancer: where does sexual health fit in? Oncol Nurs Forum 41: 297–306
2.
go back to reference Urbaniec OA, Collins K, Denson LA, Whitford S (2011) Gynecological cancer survivors: assessment of psychological distress and unmet supportive care needs. J Psychoc Oncol 29:534–551CrossRef Urbaniec OA, Collins K, Denson LA, Whitford S (2011) Gynecological cancer survivors: assessment of psychological distress and unmet supportive care needs. J Psychoc Oncol 29:534–551CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Realo A, Koido K, Ceulemans E, Allik J (2002) Three components of individualism. Eur J Pers 16:163–184CrossRef Realo A, Koido K, Ceulemans E, Allik J (2002) Three components of individualism. Eur J Pers 16:163–184CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Katajisto J (2000) Developing and testing an instrument for the measurement of individual care. J Adv Nurs 32:1253–1263CrossRef Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Katajisto J (2000) Developing and testing an instrument for the measurement of individual care. J Adv Nurs 32:1253–1263CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Leino-Kilpi H (2002) ‘Individualised care’ from patients, nurses’ and relatives’ perspective – a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 39:645–654CrossRef Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Leino-Kilpi H (2002) ‘Individualised care’ from patients, nurses’ and relatives’ perspective – a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 39:645–654CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Acaroglu R, Şendir M (2012) Bireyselleştirilmiş bakımı değerlendirme skalaları. İ.Ü. F.N.Hem. Derg 20:10–16 Acaroglu R, Şendir M (2012) Bireyselleştirilmiş bakımı değerlendirme skalaları. İ.Ü. F.N.Hem. Derg 20:10–16
11.
go back to reference Thomas L.H, McColl E, Priest J, Bond S, and Boys R.J. 1996. Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales: an instrument for quality assessments of nursing care. Qual Health Care, 5: 67–72 Thomas L.H, McColl E, Priest J, Bond S, and Boys R.J. 1996. Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales: an instrument for quality assessments of nursing care. Qual Health Care, 5: 67–72
14.
go back to reference Baycan A (1985) An analysis of the several aspects of job satisfaction between different occupational groups. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul Baycan A (1985) An analysis of the several aspects of job satisfaction between different occupational groups. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul
16.
go back to reference Ceylan B, Eser I (2016) Assessment of individualized nursing care in hospitalized patients in a university hospital in Turkey. J Nurs Manag 24:954–961CrossRef Ceylan B, Eser I (2016) Assessment of individualized nursing care in hospitalized patients in a university hospital in Turkey. J Nurs Manag 24:954–961CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Köberich S, Feuchtinger J, Farin E (2016) Factors influencing hospitalized patients’ perception of individualized nursing care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 15:14CrossRef Köberich S, Feuchtinger J, Farin E (2016) Factors influencing hospitalized patients’ perception of individualized nursing care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 15:14CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Karayurt O, Ursavas, F. E, and Iseri O. 2018. Hemşirelerin Bireyselleştirilmiş Bakım Verme Durumlarının ve Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. ACU Saglık Bil Derg 9: 163–169 Karayurt O, Ursavas, F. E, and Iseri O. 2018. Hemşirelerin Bireyselleştirilmiş Bakım Verme Durumlarının ve Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. ACU Saglık Bil Derg 9: 163–169
21.
go back to reference Gurdogan EP, Findik UY, Arslan BK (2015) Patients’ perception of ındividualized care and satisfaction with nursing care levels in Turkey. Int J Caring Sci 8:369–375 Gurdogan EP, Findik UY, Arslan BK (2015) Patients’ perception of ındividualized care and satisfaction with nursing care levels in Turkey. Int J Caring Sci 8:369–375
23.
go back to reference Suhonen R, Charalambous A, Berg A, Katajisto J, Lemonidou C, Patiraki E et al (2018) Hospitalised cancer patients’ perceptions of individualised nursing care in four European countries. Eur J Cancer Care 27:e12525CrossRef Suhonen R, Charalambous A, Berg A, Katajisto J, Lemonidou C, Patiraki E et al (2018) Hospitalised cancer patients’ perceptions of individualised nursing care in four European countries. Eur J Cancer Care 27:e12525CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rasooli A.S, Zamanzadeh V, and Rahmani A. 2013. Patients' point of view about nurses' support of ındividualized nursing care in training hospitals affiliated with Tabriz university of medical sciences. J Caring Sci 2: 203–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.5681/jcs.2013.025 Rasooli A.S, Zamanzadeh V, and Rahmani A. 2013. Patients' point of view about nurses' support of ındividualized nursing care in training hospitals affiliated with Tabriz university of medical sciences. J Caring Sci 2: 203–209. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​5681/​jcs.​2013.​025
Metadata
Title
Individualized Care: Perceptions of Gynecologic Oncology Patients and Nurses
Authors
Esra Bukecık
Fusun Terzioglu
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01708-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine