Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Care | Review

Impact of treatment summaries for cancer survivors: a systematic review

Authors: Nadia Corsini, Kim Neylon, Esther Jie Tian, Elminur Mahpirof, Amy McLaughlin, Susan Mcleod, Paul McNamara, Mary Metaxas, Sophia Minos, Rebecca Sharp, Saravana Kumar

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

As a treatment summary (TS) documents information for follow-up care, it is believed to be an important communication tool for the patient, their GP, and other health professionals. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to evaluate the impact of receiving a TS for cancer survivors when compared to receiving standard care and to identify knowledge gaps to inform future research.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken from August 2018 to October 2018. Studies were included if participants (cancer survivors) were over 18 years of age and had received a TS, and if outcomes for TS could be separated from other survivorship interventions. The McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was then conducted.

Results

Seven studies (one prospective cohort and six cross-sectional studies) met the inclusion criteria. The impact of TS was assessed using widely varied outcomes in these studies. Overall, receipt of a TS was related to greater patient understanding and perception of the quality of care provided. However, caution is required when interpreting these results due to methodological limitations.

Conclusions

This systematic review found that TS may have a positive impact on patient understandings about and perceptions of cancer care. However, more robust research including perspectives of cancer survivors is required.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

TS could play an important role for cancer survivors especially in terms of knowledge of cancer care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia. Canberra: AIHW2019. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia. Canberra: AIHW2019.
2.
go back to reference Committee on Cancer Survivorship: Improving Care and Quality of Life, National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. From cancer patient to cancer survivor lost in transition. Washington DC2006. Committee on Cancer Survivorship: Improving Care and Quality of Life, National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. From cancer patient to cancer survivor lost in transition. Washington DC2006.
19.
go back to reference Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. University of York. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. University of York.
20.
go back to reference Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J. Westmorland M. Critical review form—quantitative studies. In: Evidence-based practice research group at McMaster University, editor. McMaster University: McMaster University; 1998. Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J. Westmorland M. Critical review form—quantitative studies. In: Evidence-based practice research group at McMaster University, editor. McMaster University: McMaster University; 1998.
21.
go back to reference Coleman K. NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines: stage 2 consultation. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2008. Coleman K. NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines: stage 2 consultation. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2008.
27.
go back to reference Nissen MJ, Tsai ML, Blaes AH, Swenson KK, Koering S. Effectiveness of treatment summaries in increasing breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2013;7(2):211–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0261-7.CrossRef Nissen MJ, Tsai ML, Blaes AH, Swenson KK, Koering S. Effectiveness of treatment summaries in increasing breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2013;7(2):211–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11764-012-0261-7.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference de Rooij BH, Ezendam NP, Nicolaije KA, Vos MC, Pijnenborg JM, Boll D, et al. Effects of survivorship care plans on patient reported outcomes in ovarian cancer during 2-year follow-up—the ROGY care trial. 2017;145(2):319–28. de Rooij BH, Ezendam NP, Nicolaije KA, Vos MC, Pijnenborg JM, Boll D, et al. Effects of survivorship care plans on patient reported outcomes in ovarian cancer during 2-year follow-up—the ROGY care trial. 2017;145(2):319–28.
34.
go back to reference Majhail NS, Murphy E, Laud P, Preussler JM, Denzen EM, Abetti B et al. Randomized controlled trial of individualized treatment summary and survivorship care plans for hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors. Haematologica. 2019;104(5):1084–1092. doi:https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.203919 Haematologica. Majhail NS, Murphy E, Laud P, Preussler JM, Denzen EM, Abetti B et al. Randomized controlled trial of individualized treatment summary and survivorship care plans for hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors. Haematologica. 2019;104(5):1084–1092. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​3324/​haematol.​2018.​203919 Haematologica.
37.
go back to reference Tevaarwerk AJ, Hocking WG, Buhr KA, Gribble M, Seaborne LA, Wisinski KB, et al. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed survivorship care plan receipt on patient satisfaction and knowledge of diagnosis and treatment. 2019;125(6):1000–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31875. Tevaarwerk AJ, Hocking WG, Buhr KA, Gribble M, Seaborne LA, Wisinski KB, et al. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed survivorship care plan receipt on patient satisfaction and knowledge of diagnosis and treatment. 2019;125(6):1000–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​31875.
44.
go back to reference Sterba KR, Zapka J, LaPelle N, Garris TK, Buchanan A, Scallion M, et al. Development of a survivorship needs assessment planning tool for head and neck cancer survivors and their caregivers: a preliminary study. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2017;11(6):822–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0621-4.CrossRef Sterba KR, Zapka J, LaPelle N, Garris TK, Buchanan A, Scallion M, et al. Development of a survivorship needs assessment planning tool for head and neck cancer survivors and their caregivers: a preliminary study. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2017;11(6):822–32. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11764-017-0621-4.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Tait D, Scammell J, Mills A, Waight S, Heaslip V, Sheppard Z, et al. An evaluation of the progress made towards the implementation of treatment summaries for cancer patients across Wessex. Poole, England: Centre for Implementation Science,Wessex Strategic Clinical Networks; 2016. Tait D, Scammell J, Mills A, Waight S, Heaslip V, Sheppard Z, et al. An evaluation of the progress made towards the implementation of treatment summaries for cancer patients across Wessex. Poole, England: Centre for Implementation Science,Wessex Strategic Clinical Networks; 2016.
48.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Mattioli V, Minton O, Weis J, Johansen C. Dalton SO et al. Beyond treatment—psychosocial and behavioural issues in cancer survivorship research and practice. 2014;12(1):54–64. Aaronson NK, Mattioli V, Minton O, Weis J, Johansen C. Dalton SO et al. Beyond treatment—psychosocial and behavioural issues in cancer survivorship research and practice. 2014;12(1):54–64.
50.
go back to reference Eriksson H, Lyth J, Månsson-Brahme E, Frohm-Nilsson M, Ingvar C, Lindholm C, et al. Low level of education is associated with later stage at diagnosis and reduced survival in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a nationwide population-based study in Sweden. 2013;49(12):2705–16. Eriksson H, Lyth J, Månsson-Brahme E, Frohm-Nilsson M, Ingvar C, Lindholm C, et al. Low level of education is associated with later stage at diagnosis and reduced survival in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a nationwide population-based study in Sweden. 2013;49(12):2705–16.
Metadata
Title
Impact of treatment summaries for cancer survivors: a systematic review
Authors
Nadia Corsini
Kim Neylon
Esther Jie Tian
Elminur Mahpirof
Amy McLaughlin
Susan Mcleod
Paul McNamara
Mary Metaxas
Sophia Minos
Rebecca Sharp
Saravana Kumar
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00859-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 4/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine