Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Care | Research

Horizontal inequity in the use and access to health care in Uruguay

Authors: Cecilia González, Patricia Triunfo

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In 2007 Uruguay began a reform in the health sector towards the construction of a National Integrated Health System (SNIS), based on public insurance with private and public provision. The main objective of the reform was to universalize access to health services.

Methods

Data comes from the first National Health Survey conducted in 2014 and available since 2016. Concentration indices are calculated for different indicators of use and access to medical services, for the population 18 years of age and older, and for different subgroups (age, sex, region and type of coverage). The indices are decomposed into need and non-need variables and the contribution of each of them to total inequality is analyzed. Horizontal inequity is calculated.

Results

Results show pro-rich inequality for medical consultations, medical analysis, medication use and non-access due to costs. Type of health coverage is the variable that explains most of the inequality: private coverage is pro-rich while public coverage is pro-poor. Income does not appear as significant to explain inequality, except for access issues.
From the population subgroups’ analysis, there is no evidence of inequality for the group of 60 years old or more. On the other hand, studies such as Pap Smear and prostate, which may be associated with preventive studies,, shows pro-rich inequality and, in both cases, the main contribution is given by income.

Conclusions

The analysis of health inequity shows pro-rich inequity in medical consultations, medical analysis, medication use and lack of access due to costs. The type of health coverage explains these inequalities; in particular, private coverage is pro-rich. These results suggest that the type of health coverage are capturing the income factor, since higher income individuals will be more likely to be treated in the private system.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
2
This index does not control for potential endogeneity between the needs for health services and the medical care received, which may be due, for example, to the contemporary measurement of both variables; neither between income and the use of health services, due to both the simultaneity in the measurement and the existence of omitted need-variables that affect the use of services and may be correlated with income [3, 4]. Only works that use longitudinal data overcome these problems
 
3
Standard errors are calculated through bootstrapping with 400 replications (StataCorp, 2014).
 
4
The ENS was based on a randomized, stratified, and multi-stage sample design (three stages in Montevideo and four stages in the rest of the country), The sampling frame was the 2011 Census. More details in “First Report of National Health Survey (2016)” in https://​www.​gub.​uy/​ministerio-salud-publica/​datos-y-estadisticas/​datos/​encuesta-nacional-de-salud
 
5
Continuous Household Survey is a national survey with a long tradition of confiability, performed by the National Statistics Institute. Income information from this Survey is using to calculate official statistics about poverty and income inequality.
 
6
As a robustness check, another strategy for imputation of income was carried out. The method performs multiple stochastic imputations, using information from the variable itself as well as the relationship between different ENS variables. This method assumes that the probability that the data is missing does not depend on unobservable characteristics (they are “missing at random”). The missing data was imputed 10 times to give variability of the imputation. An algorithm was used based on the so-called chained equations (Stata software), which performs a sequence of univariate imputations with specific models for each variable (“Full 6 Conditional Specifications”). Therefore, a multivariate imputation is carried out, using the conditional density of the observed data for each variable. The results do not vary significantly from those presented in this paper and are available by request.
 
7
The five original options of health status were grouped into three categories due to the low frequency of some of these options.
 
8
Diseases considered were renal failure, heart problems, hyper or hypothyroidism, respiratory diseases (emphysema or asthma), bone-muscle diseases (arthritis / osteoarthritis, rheumatism, osteoporosis, tendinitis and spinal problems); biological risk factors considered were overweight or obesity, hypertension, high cholesterol and diabetes.
 
9
Limitations considered were: blindness, difficulties to see even with glasses, deafness, hearing difficulties even using hearing aids, speech difficulties, inability or difficulty to move that requires the permanent use of a wheelchair, impossibility or difficulty to move that requires the use of a cane or crutches permanently, limitations for using hands and arms, limitations for moving outside the house or using means of transport, limitations for moving inside the house, mental limitations that make learning and application of knowledge and task development difficult; mental limitations that make it difficult to interact with others.
 
10
The ENS allows for a partial approximation to these behaviors, since it does not release information necessary to establish the risk levels. In this sense, the binary variables are defined: alcohol, which takes the value 1 if the person consumed alcohol three or more times per week, or if he got drunk several times, in the last 30 days; sedentary, which takes the value 1 if the person declares that he is sitting for most of the day and at the same time does not usually perform at least 10 minutes of physical activity; smoke, takes the value 1 if the person currently smokes every day. As for eating habits, the ENS collects the frequency of habitual consumption of a set of foods (not the amount consumed), allowing to specify the binary variable unhealthy food that takes the value 1 if the person consumes fruits or vegetables 1 or 2 times per week (or less), if eats snacks (chips, cookies), “fast” food or drinks with sugar 3 times per week (or more).
 
11
Double coverage refers to people who declare have public and private health coverage.
 
13
The results are available by request.
 
14
In O'Donnell et al. [12] is an exhaustive detail of the definitions of equity in health and its implementation through the use of data from household surveys in Stata.
 
15
There is a debate about the use of health care variables as dependent variables since it is binary variables. Although non-linear models are recommended in these cases, there is also evidence of similar results using linear and non-linear models [1]. We calculate the linear approximation to the nonlinear model for all estimates since this allows the decomposition analysis.
 
16
This index does not control for potential endogeneity between the needs for health services and the medical care received, which may be due, for example, to the contemporary measurement of both variables; neither between income and the use of health services, due to both the simultaneity in the measurement and the existence of omitted need-variables that affect the use of services and may be correlated with income [3, 4]. Only works that use longitudinal data overcome these problems
 
17
Standard errors are calculated through bootstrapping with 400 replications (StataCorp, 2014).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Almeida G, Sarti FM. Measuring evolution of income-related inequalities in health and health care utilization in selected Latin American and Caribbean countries. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33(2):83–9.PubMedCrossRef Almeida G, Sarti FM. Measuring evolution of income-related inequalities in health and health care utilization in selected Latin American and Caribbean countries. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33(2):83–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Almeida G, Sarti FM, Ferreira FF, Diaz MDM, Campino ACC. Analysis of the evolution and determinants of income-related inequalities in the Brazilian health system, 1998-2008. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:90–7.PubMedCrossRef Almeida G, Sarti FM, Ferreira FF, Diaz MDM, Campino ACC. Analysis of the evolution and determinants of income-related inequalities in the Brazilian health system, 1998-2008. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:90–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Balsa A, Ferrés D, Rossi M, Triunfo P. Inequidades socioeconómicas en el uso de servicios sanitarios del adulto mayor montevideano. Estud Econ. 2009;24(47):35–88. Balsa A, Ferrés D, Rossi M, Triunfo P. Inequidades socioeconómicas en el uso de servicios sanitarios del adulto mayor montevideano. Estud Econ. 2009;24(47):35–88.
4.
go back to reference Balsa A, Rossi M, Triunfo P. Horizontal inequality in access to health care in four south American cities. Rev Econ Rosario. 2011;14(1):31–56. Balsa A, Rossi M, Triunfo P. Horizontal inequality in access to health care in four south American cities. Rev Econ Rosario. 2011;14(1):31–56.
5.
go back to reference Barraza-Lloréns M, Panopoulou G, Díaz BY. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health and health care utilization in Mexico, 2000-2006. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:122–30.PubMedCrossRef Barraza-Lloréns M, Panopoulou G, Díaz BY. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health and health care utilization in Mexico, 2000-2006. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:122–30.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barraza-Lloréns M, Panopoulou G, Díaz BY. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health and health care utilization in Mexico, 2000–2006. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:122–30. Barraza-Lloréns M, Panopoulou G, Díaz BY. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health and health care utilization in Mexico, 2000–2006. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:122–30.
7.
go back to reference Devaux M. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2015;16(1):21–33.PubMedCrossRef Devaux M. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2015;16(1):21–33.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fleurbaey M, Schokkaert E. Unfair inequalities in health and health care. J Health Econ. 2009;28(1):73–90.PubMedCrossRef Fleurbaey M, Schokkaert E. Unfair inequalities in health and health care. J Health Econ. 2009;28(1):73–90.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Granda ML, Jimenez WG. The evolution of socioeconomic health inequalities in Ecuador during a public health system reform (2006–2014). Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Granda ML, Jimenez WG. The evolution of socioeconomic health inequalities in Ecuador during a public health system reform (2006–2014). Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gravelle H. Measuring income related inequality in health: standardisation and the partial concentration index. Health Econ. 2003;12(10):803–19.PubMedCrossRef Gravelle H. Measuring income related inequality in health: standardisation and the partial concentration index. Health Econ. 2003;12(10):803–19.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kakwani N. Income inequality and poverty. New York: World Bank; 1980. Kakwani N. Income inequality and poverty. New York: World Bank; 1980.
12.
go back to reference Kakwani N, Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation, and statistical inference. J Econ. 1997;77:87–103.CrossRef Kakwani N, Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation, and statistical inference. J Econ. 1997;77:87–103.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference StataCorp, L. P. (2014). Stata 13. College Station: StataCorp LP. StataCorp, L. P. (2014). Stata 13. College Station: StataCorp LP.
15.
go back to reference Suárez-Berenguela RM. Health system inequalities and inequities in Latin America and the Caribbean: findings and policy implications. Washington, D.C.: Pan American Health Organization; 2000. p. 119–42. Suárez-Berenguela RM. Health system inequalities and inequities in Latin America and the Caribbean: findings and policy implications. Washington, D.C.: Pan American Health Organization; 2000. p. 119–42.
16.
go back to reference van Doorslaer E, Koolman X, Puffer F. Equity in the use of physician visits in OECD countries: has equal treatment for equal need been achieved. Measuring up: improving health system performance in OECD countries; 2002. van Doorslaer E, Koolman X, Puffer F. Equity in the use of physician visits in OECD countries: has equal treatment for equal need been achieved. Measuring up: improving health system performance in OECD countries; 2002.
17.
go back to reference van Doorslaer E, Masseria C, Koolman X. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174(2):177–83.CrossRef van Doorslaer E, Masseria C, Koolman X. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174(2):177–83.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A. Equity in the delivery of health care: some international comparisons. J Health Econ. 1992;11(4):389–411.PubMedCrossRef van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A. Equity in the delivery of health care: some international comparisons. J Health Econ. 1992;11(4):389–411.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Bleichrodt H, Calonge S, Gerdtham UG, Gerfin M, et al. Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons. J Health Econ. 1997;16(1):93–112.PubMedCrossRef van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Bleichrodt H, Calonge S, Gerdtham UG, Gerfin M, et al. Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons. J Health Econ. 1997;16(1):93–112.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Van der Burg H, Christiansen T, De Graeve D, Duchesne I, et al. Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US. J Health Econ. 2000;19(5):553–83.PubMedCrossRef van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Van der Burg H, Christiansen T, De Graeve D, Duchesne I, et al. Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US. J Health Econ. 2000;19(5):553–83.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Doorslaer EV, Koolman X, Jones AM. Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe. Health Econ. 2004;13(7):629–47.PubMedCrossRef van Doorslaer EV, Koolman X, Jones AM. Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe. Health Econ. 2004;13(7):629–47.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vásquez F, Paraje G, Estay M. Income-related inequality in health and health care utilization in Chile, 2000-2009. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:98–106.PubMedCrossRef Vásquez F, Paraje G, Estay M. Income-related inequality in health and health care utilization in Chile, 2000-2009. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:98–106.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wagstaff A, Paci P, van Doorslaer E. Equity in the finance and delivery of health care: some tentative cross-country comparisons. Oxf Rev Econ Policy. 1989;5(1):89–112.CrossRef Wagstaff A, Paci P, van Doorslaer E. Equity in the finance and delivery of health care: some tentative cross-country comparisons. Oxf Rev Econ Policy. 1989;5(1):89–112.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Measuring and testing for inequity in the delivery of health care. J Hum Resour. 2000;35(4):716–33.CrossRef Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Measuring and testing for inequity in the delivery of health care. J Hum Resour. 2000;35(4):716–33.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E, Paci P. On the measurement of horizontal inequity in the delivery of health care. J Health Econ. 1991;10(2):169–205.PubMedCrossRef Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E, Paci P. On the measurement of horizontal inequity in the delivery of health care. J Health Econ. 1991;10(2):169–205.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Horizontal inequity in the use and access to health care in Uruguay
Authors
Cecilia González
Patricia Triunfo
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01237-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020 Go to the issue