Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Care | Research

Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study

Authors: Leslie Verville, Carol Cancelliere, Gaelan Connell, Joyce Lee, Sarah Munce, Silvano Mior, Robin Kay, Pierre Côté

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

End-user involvement in developing evidence-based tools for clinical practice may result in increased uptake and improved patient outcomes. Understanding end-user experiences and perceptions about the co-production of knowledge is useful to further the science of integrated knowledge translation (iKT) – a strategy for accelerating the uptake and impact of research. Our study had two main objectives: (1) explore end-user (clinician) experiences of co-producing an evidence-based practice tool; and (2) describe end-user perceptions in knowledge development.

Methods

We used a qualitative study design. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians and used a transcendental phenomenological approach to analyze themes/phenomena. In addition, we explored the interrelated themes between the thematic maps of each objective.

Results

Four themes emerged from clinicians’ experiences in co-producing the practice tool: ease/convenience of participating, need for support and encouragement, understanding the value of participating, and individual skillsets yield meaningful contributions. Stakeholder roles in knowledge tool development and improving dissemination of evidence and knowledge tools were themes that related to clinician perceptions in knowledge development. The review of interrelated thematic maps depicts an intertwined relationship between stakeholders and dissemination.

Conclusions

End-users provide invaluable insight and perspective into the development of evidence-based clinical tools. Exploring the experiences and perceptions of end-users may support future research endeavours involving iKT, such as the co-production of clinical resources, potentially improving uptake and patient health outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bowen SJ, Graham ID. From knowledge translation to engaged scholarship: promoting research relevance and utilization. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1 Suppl):S3-8.PubMed Bowen SJ, Graham ID. From knowledge translation to engaged scholarship: promoting research relevance and utilization. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1 Suppl):S3-8.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Wilkinson H, Gallagher M, Smith M. A collaborative approach to defining the usefulness of impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners. Evidence Pol. 2012;8(3):311–27.CrossRef Wilkinson H, Gallagher M, Smith M. A collaborative approach to defining the usefulness of impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners. Evidence Pol. 2012;8(3):311–27.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kothari A, MacLean L, Edwards N, Hobbs A. Indicators at the interface: managing policymaker-researcher collaboration. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2011;9(3):203–14.CrossRef Kothari A, MacLean L, Edwards N, Hobbs A. Indicators at the interface: managing policymaker-researcher collaboration. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2011;9(3):203–14.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bird ML, Mortenson BW, Chu F, Acerra N, Bagnall E, Wright A, et al. Building a Bridge to the Community: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Improving Participation in Community-Based Exercise for People After Stroke. Phys Ther. 2019;99(3):286–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bird ML, Mortenson BW, Chu F, Acerra N, Bagnall E, Wright A, et al. Building a Bridge to the Community: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Improving Participation in Community-Based Exercise for People After Stroke. Phys Ther. 2019;99(3):286–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, Boyko J, Urquhart R. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implementation science: IS. 2016;11:38-.PubMedCentralCrossRef Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, Boyko J, Urquhart R. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implementation science: IS. 2016;11:38-.PubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lomas J. Essay: Using ‘Linkage And Exchange’To Move Research Into Policy At A Canadian Foundation: Encouraging partnerships between researchers and policymakers is the goal of a promising new Canadian initiative. Health affairs. 2000;19(3):236–40.PubMedCrossRef Lomas J. Essay: Using ‘Linkage And Exchange’To Move Research Into Policy At A Canadian Foundation: Encouraging partnerships between researchers and policymakers is the goal of a promising new Canadian initiative. Health affairs. 2000;19(3):236–40.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference King G, Currie M, Smith L, Servais M, McDougall J. A framework of operating models for interdisciplinary research programs in clinical service organizations. Evaluation and program planning. 2008;31(2):160–73.PubMedCrossRef King G, Currie M, Smith L, Servais M, McDougall J. A framework of operating models for interdisciplinary research programs in clinical service organizations. Evaluation and program planning. 2008;31(2):160–73.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ettelt S, Mays N. Health services research in Europe and its use for informing policy. Journal of health services research & policy. 2011;16(2_suppl):48–60.CrossRef Ettelt S, Mays N. Health services research in Europe and its use for informing policy. Journal of health services research & policy. 2011;16(2_suppl):48–60.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Newton MS, Estabrooks CA, Norton P, Birdsell JM, Adewale AJ, Thornley R. Health researchers in Alberta: an exploratory comparison of defining characteristics and knowledge translation activities. Implementation Science. 2007;2(1):1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Newton MS, Estabrooks CA, Norton P, Birdsell JM, Adewale AJ, Thornley R. Health researchers in Alberta: an exploratory comparison of defining characteristics and knowledge translation activities. Implementation Science. 2007;2(1):1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ray KN, Miller E. Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement. Journal of comparative effectiveness research. 2017;6(4):375–89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ray KN, Miller E. Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement. Journal of comparative effectiveness research. 2017;6(4):375–89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Oborn E, Barrett M, Prince K, Racko G. Balancing exploration and exploitation in transferring research into practice: a comparison of five knowledge translation entity archetypes. Implementation Science. 2013;8(1):104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Oborn E, Barrett M, Prince K, Racko G. Balancing exploration and exploitation in transferring research into practice: a comparison of five knowledge translation entity archetypes. Implementation Science. 2013;8(1):104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Coughlan J, Lycett M, Macredie RD. Communication issues in requirements elicitation: a content analysis of stakeholder experiences. Information and Software Technology. 2003;45(8):525–37.CrossRef Coughlan J, Lycett M, Macredie RD. Communication issues in requirements elicitation: a content analysis of stakeholder experiences. Information and Software Technology. 2003;45(8):525–37.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. Journal of health services research & policy. 2002;7(4):239–44.CrossRef Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. Journal of health services research & policy. 2002;7(4):239–44.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lapaige V. “Integrated knowledge translation” for globally oriented public health practitioners and scientists: Framing together a sustainable transfrontier knowledge translation vision. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2010;3:33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lapaige V. “Integrated knowledge translation” for globally oriented public health practitioners and scientists: Framing together a sustainable transfrontier knowledge translation vision. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2010;3:33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Keown K, Van Eerd D, Irvin E. Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2008;28(2):67–72.CrossRefPubMed Keown K, Van Eerd D, Irvin E. Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2008;28(2):67–72.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Segrott J, McIvor M, Green B. Challenges and strategies in developing nursing research capacity: a review of the literature. International journal of nursing studies. 2006;43(5):637–51.PubMedCrossRef Segrott J, McIvor M, Green B. Challenges and strategies in developing nursing research capacity: a review of the literature. International journal of nursing studies. 2006;43(5):637–51.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cooke J, Nancarrow S, Dyas J, Williams M. An evaluation of the ‘Designated Research Team’ approach to building research capacity in primary care. BMC Family Practice. 2008;9(1):37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cooke J, Nancarrow S, Dyas J, Williams M. An evaluation of the ‘Designated Research Team’ approach to building research capacity in primary care. BMC Family Practice. 2008;9(1):37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Haas M. Health services research in Australia: an investigation of its current status. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2004;9(2_suppl):3–9.CrossRef Haas M. Health services research in Australia: an investigation of its current status. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2004;9(2_suppl):3–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dayan PS, Osmond M, Kuppermann N, Lang E, Klassen T, Johnson D, et al. Development of the capacity necessary to perform and promote knowledge translation research in emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007;14(11):978–83.PubMedCrossRef Dayan PS, Osmond M, Kuppermann N, Lang E, Klassen T, Johnson D, et al. Development of the capacity necessary to perform and promote knowledge translation research in emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007;14(11):978–83.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, et al. Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. The Milbank Quarterly. 2008;86(1):125–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, et al. Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. The Milbank Quarterly. 2008;86(1):125–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Roberge-Dao J, Yardley B, Menon A, Halle M-C, Maman J, Ahmed S, et al. A mixed-methods approach to understanding partnership experiences and outcomes of projects from an integrated knowledge translation funding model in rehabilitation. BMC health services research. 2019;19(1):230.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Roberge-Dao J, Yardley B, Menon A, Halle M-C, Maman J, Ahmed S, et al. A mixed-methods approach to understanding partnership experiences and outcomes of projects from an integrated knowledge translation funding model in rehabilitation. BMC health services research. 2019;19(1):230.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dizon JM, Machingaidze S, Grimmer K. To adopt, to adapt, or to contextualise? The big question in clinical practice guideline development. BMC research notes. 2016;9(1):442-.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dizon JM, Machingaidze S, Grimmer K. To adopt, to adapt, or to contextualise? The big question in clinical practice guideline development. BMC research notes. 2016;9(1):442-.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Neubauer BE, Witkop CT, Varpio L. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2019;8(2):90–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Neubauer BE, Witkop CT, Varpio L. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2019;8(2):90–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lopez KA, Willis DG. Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative health research. 2004;14(5):726–35.PubMedCrossRef Lopez KA, Willis DG. Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative health research. 2004;14(5):726–35.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Adom D, Yeboah A, Ankrah AK. Constructivism philosophical paradigm: Implication for research, teaching and learning. Global journal of arts humanities and social sciences. 2016;4(10):1–9. Adom D, Yeboah A, Ankrah AK. Constructivism philosophical paradigm: Implication for research, teaching and learning. Global journal of arts humanities and social sciences. 2016;4(10):1–9.
28.
go back to reference Fischer CT. Bracketing in qualitative research: Conceptual and practical matters. Psychotherapy Research. 2009;19(4–5):583–90.PubMedCrossRef Fischer CT. Bracketing in qualitative research: Conceptual and practical matters. Psychotherapy Research. 2009;19(4–5):583–90.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tong A SP, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.PubMedCrossRef Tong A SP, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kallio H PA, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016;72(12):2954–65.PubMedCrossRef Kallio H PA, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016;72(12):2954–65.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Galletta A. Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication: NYU press; 2013.CrossRef Galletta A. Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication: NYU press; 2013.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference McGrath C, Palmgren PJ, Liljedahl M. Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher. 2019;41(9):1002–6.PubMedCrossRef McGrath C, Palmgren PJ, Liljedahl M. Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher. 2019;41(9):1002–6.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Cresswell JW, Poth CN. Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2007;2:53–80. Cresswell JW, Poth CN. Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2007;2:53–80.
37.
go back to reference Mero-Jaffe I. ‘Is that what I said?’Interview transcript approval by participants: an aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods. 2011;10(3):231–47.CrossRef Mero-Jaffe I. ‘Is that what I said?’Interview transcript approval by participants: an aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods. 2011;10(3):231–47.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802–11.PubMedCrossRef Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802–11.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bazeley P. Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research. 2009;2(2):6–22. Bazeley P. Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research. 2009;2(2):6–22.
40.
go back to reference Petit-Steeghs V, Schuitmaker-Warnaar TJ, Pruijssers CA, van Oortmerssen G, Broerse JEW. A qualitative research on co-creating care pathways for Sarcoma and GIST by stimulating reflection. International Journal of Care Coordination. 2020;23(1):24–32.CrossRef Petit-Steeghs V, Schuitmaker-Warnaar TJ, Pruijssers CA, van Oortmerssen G, Broerse JEW. A qualitative research on co-creating care pathways for Sarcoma and GIST by stimulating reflection. International Journal of Care Coordination. 2020;23(1):24–32.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, Graham E, Thomas A, Sprung J, et al. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disability and rehabilitation. 2015;37(15):1390–400.PubMedCrossRef Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, Graham E, Thomas A, Sprung J, et al. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disability and rehabilitation. 2015;37(15):1390–400.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kothari A, Wathen CN. A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy. 2013;109(2):187–91.PubMedCrossRef Kothari A, Wathen CN. A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy. 2013;109(2):187–91.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg JON, Bush PL, Henderson JIM, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. The Milbank Quarterly. 2012;90(2):311–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg JON, Bush PL, Henderson JIM, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. The Milbank Quarterly. 2012;90(2):311–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Cardel MI, Manasse S, Krukowski RA, Ross K, Shakour R, Miller DR, et al. COVID-19 impacts mental health outcomes and ability/desire to participate in research among current research participants. Obesity. 2020;28(12):2272–81.PubMedCrossRef Cardel MI, Manasse S, Krukowski RA, Ross K, Shakour R, Miller DR, et al. COVID-19 impacts mental health outcomes and ability/desire to participate in research among current research participants. Obesity. 2020;28(12):2272–81.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study
Authors
Leslie Verville
Carol Cancelliere
Gaelan Connell
Joyce Lee
Sarah Munce
Silvano Mior
Robin Kay
Pierre Côté
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue