Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research article

Expectations and needs of socially vulnerable patients for navigational support of primary health care services

Authors: Carine Sandrine Ngo Bikoko Piemeu, Christine Loignon, Émilie Dionne, Andrée-Anne Paré-Plante, Jeannie Haggerty, Mylaine Breton

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Primary healthcare is the main entry to the health care system for most of the population. In 2008, it was estimated that about 26% of the population in Quebec (Canada) did not have a regular family physician. In early 2017, about 10 years after the introduction of a centralized waiting list for patients without a family physician, Québec had 25% of its population without a family physician and nearly 33% of these or 540,000, many of whom were socially vulnerable (SV), remained registered on the list. SV patients often have more health problems. They also face access inequities or may lack the skills needed to navigate a constantly evolving and complex healthcare system. Navigation interventions show promise for improving access to primary health care for SV patients. This study aimed to describe and understand the expectations and needs of SV patients.

Methods

A descriptive qualitative study rooted in a participatory study on navigation interventions implemented in Montérégie (Quebec) addressed to SV patients. Semi-structured individual face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted with patients recruited in three primary health care clinics, some of whom received the navigation intervention. A thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 11 software.

Results

Sixteen patients living in socially deprived contexts agreed to participate in this qualitative study. Three main expectations and needs of patients for navigation interventions were identified: communication expectations (support to understand providers and to be understood by them, discuss about medical visit, and bridge the communication cap between patients and PHC providers); relational expectations regarding emotional or psychosocial support; and pragmatic expectations (information on available resources, information about the clinic, and physical support to navigate the health care system).

Conclusions

Our study contributes to the literature by identifying expectations and needs specified to SV patients accessing primary health care services, that relate to navigation interventions. This information can be used by decision makers for navigation interventions design and inform health care organizational policies.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Breton M, Smithman MA, Brousselle A, Loignon C, Touati N, Dubois CA, et al. Assessing the performance of centralized waiting lists for patients without a regular family physician using clinical-administrative data. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Breton M, Smithman MA, Brousselle A, Loignon C, Touati N, Dubois CA, et al. Assessing the performance of centralized waiting lists for patients without a regular family physician using clinical-administrative data. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Breton M, Green M, Kreindler S, Sutherland J, Jbilou J, Wong ST, et al. A comparative analysis of centralized waiting lists for patients without a primary care provider implemented in six Canadian provinces: study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Breton M, Green M, Kreindler S, Sutherland J, Jbilou J, Wong ST, et al. A comparative analysis of centralized waiting lists for patients without a primary care provider implemented in six Canadian provinces: study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Loignon C, Hudon C, Goulet É. Perceived barriers to healthcare for persons living in poverty in Quebec, Canada: the EQUIhealThY project. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Loignon C, Hudon C, Goulet É. Perceived barriers to healthcare for persons living in poverty in Quebec, Canada: the EQUIhealThY project. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ploeg J, Valaitis RK, Cleghorn L. Perceptions of older adults in Ontario, Canada on the implementation and impact of a primary care programme, health teams advancing patient experience: strengthening quality (health TAPESTRY): a descriptive qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):026257.CrossRef Ploeg J, Valaitis RK, Cleghorn L. Perceptions of older adults in Ontario, Canada on the implementation and impact of a primary care programme, health teams advancing patient experience: strengthening quality (health TAPESTRY): a descriptive qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):026257.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kelly K, Doucet S, Luke A. Exploring the roles, functions, and background of patient navigators and case managers: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;98:27–47.PubMedCrossRef Kelly K, Doucet S, Luke A. Exploring the roles, functions, and background of patient navigators and case managers: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;98:27–47.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Enard KR, Ganelin DME. Reducing preventable emergency department utilization and costs by using community health workers as patient navigators. J Heal Manag. 2013;58(6):412–28. Enard KR, Ganelin DME. Reducing preventable emergency department utilization and costs by using community health workers as patient navigators. J Heal Manag. 2013;58(6):412–28.
23.
go back to reference Reid AE, Doucet S, Luke A. Exploring the role of lay and professional patient navigators in Canada. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020;25(4):229–37.PubMedCrossRef Reid AE, Doucet S, Luke A. Exploring the role of lay and professional patient navigators in Canada. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020;25(4):229–37.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wells KJ, Nuhaily S. Models of Patient Navigation. In: Calhoun E, Esparza A, editors. Patient Navigation. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2018. p. 27–40.CrossRef Wells KJ, Nuhaily S. Models of Patient Navigation. In: Calhoun E, Esparza A, editors. Patient Navigation. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2018. p. 27–40.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Richard L, Furler J, Densley K. Equity of access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations: the IMPACT international online survey of innovations. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Richard L, Furler J, Densley K. Equity of access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations: the IMPACT international online survey of innovations. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Russell G, Kunin M, Harris M, Levesque JF, Descôteaux S, Scott C, et al. Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e027869. Russell G, Kunin M, Harris M, Levesque JF, Descôteaux S, Scott C, et al. Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e027869.
30.
go back to reference Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Charlebois K, Loignon C, Boudreault-Fournier A, Dupéré S, Grabovschi C. The involvement of vulnerable people in participatory research in primary care: a review of the literature. Global Health Promotion. 2014;21(3):38–45.PubMedCrossRef Charlebois K, Loignon C, Boudreault-Fournier A, Dupéré S, Grabovschi C. The involvement of vulnerable people in participatory research in primary care: a review of the literature. Global Health Promotion. 2014;21(3):38–45.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bodenmann P, Wolff H, Madrid C. Vulnerabilities and health: why a new section? Swiss Med Review. 2009;5(199):849. Bodenmann P, Wolff H, Madrid C. Vulnerabilities and health: why a new section? Swiss Med Review. 2009;5(199):849.
36.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
41.
go back to reference Petereit DG, Molloy K, Reiner ML. Establishing a patient navigator program to reduce cancer disparities in the American Indian communities of Western South Dakota: initial observations and results. Cancer Control. 2008;15:254–9.PubMedCrossRef Petereit DG, Molloy K, Reiner ML. Establishing a patient navigator program to reduce cancer disparities in the American Indian communities of Western South Dakota: initial observations and results. Cancer Control. 2008;15:254–9.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Institut canadien d’information sur la santé. Learning From the Best: Benchmarking Canada's Health Care System. Ottawa: ICIS; 2011. Institut canadien d’information sur la santé. Learning From the Best: Benchmarking Canada's Health Care System. Ottawa: ICIS; 2011.
Metadata
Title
Expectations and needs of socially vulnerable patients for navigational support of primary health care services
Authors
Carine Sandrine Ngo Bikoko Piemeu
Christine Loignon
Émilie Dionne
Andrée-Anne Paré-Plante
Jeannie Haggerty
Mylaine Breton
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06811-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue