Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Commentary

Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial

Authors: Caroline Brundle, Anne Heaven, Andrew Clegg

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many research teams to adjust the way they conduct studies, including moving to remote delivery of some or all of their recruitment and data collection processes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used in research and is available in multiple formats for different groups and assessment settings. Here, we reflect on our experiences of administering the MoCA Blind/Telephone as part of the initial telephone eligibility check for participation in a randomised controlled trial with community-dwelling older people with frailty.

Main body

In response to COVID-19, a number of changes were made to the trial’s screening and recruitment procedures, to minimise the amount of time the researchers would spend in the participants’ homes when recruitment began in May 2021. One of the changes was for the researchers to conduct a cognitive assessment for eligibility during an initial telephone call, rather than during the subsequent home visit for consent and baseline data collection. We found that in comparison with conducting the assessment in-person, telephone administration caused uncertainty for the researchers about whether participants were struggling to answer questions due to cognition or hearing impairment. Some participants experienced practical difficulties when combining holding a telephone and completing one of the assessment items. It was hard for the researchers to judge the emotional impact that undertaking the assessment was having on the older people on the telephone, without visual warning signs of fatigue or mood. We discuss the potential impact of these issues on trial recruitment and participant engagement, and the feasibility of videoconferencing as an alternative method of conducting the MoCA.

Conclusion

The MoCA is a useful tool when cognitive impairment is part of screening and data collection and it is helpful to have the option to use the test remotely. However, as we have found, telephone testing is not always straightforward. Researchers should weigh up the pros and cons for each individual study, especially those involving older adults. If choosing remote methods, consider the practicality of using videoconferencing and think about the possible impact of telephone assessment on the relationship with the (potential) research participants.

Trial registration

Personalised care planning for older people with frailty ISRCTN16123291 28/08/2020.
Literature
9.
go back to reference Pendlebury ST, Welch SJ, Cuthbertson FC, Mariz J, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Telephone assessment of cognition after transient ischemic attack and stroke: modified telephone interview of cognitive status and telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment versus face-to-face Montreal Cognitive Assessment and neuropsychological battery. Stroke. 2013;44(1):227–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673384.CrossRefPubMed Pendlebury ST, Welch SJ, Cuthbertson FC, Mariz J, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Telephone assessment of cognition after transient ischemic attack and stroke: modified telephone interview of cognitive status and telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment versus face-to-face Montreal Cognitive Assessment and neuropsychological battery. Stroke. 2013;44(1):227–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​STROKEAHA.​112.​673384.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial
Authors
Caroline Brundle
Anne Heaven
Andrew Clegg
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06805-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue