Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BioPsychoSocial Medicine
Published in: BioPsychoSocial Medicine 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

Effect of handholding on heart rate variability in both patients with cancer and their family caregivers: a randomized crossover study

Authors: Hiroko Sakuma, Hideaki Hasuo, Mikihiko Fukunaga

Published in: BioPsychoSocial Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many family caregivers of patients with cancer feel guilty about self-care. A meaningful relationship with patients reduces such negative feelings and functions as self-care for family caregivers. Moreover, handholding improves autonomic functions in non-cancer patients. However, the effects of handholding on both patients with cancer and family caregivers remain unknown.

Methods

We evaluated the effects of handholding on heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with cancer and their family caregivers. This randomized crossover study divided patients with cancer and their family caregivers into two trial groups: Handholding trial (the family caregiver holds the patient’s hand for five minutes) and Beside trial (the family caregiver stays beside the patient without holding their hand). The study included 37 pairs of patients with cancer who received treatment in the cancer department of a university hospital in Japan and their family caregivers (n = 74). The primary end-point was the change in HRV before and during the intervention.

Results

The median performance status of the patients was 3. An interaction was observed between trials in the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal interval (SDNN) of HRV for family caregivers (F = 7.669; p = 0.006), and a significant difference in time course was observed between the trials (before p = 0.351; during p = 0.003). No interaction was observed between trials in the SDNN for patients (F = 0.331; p = 0.566). Only a main effect in time course (F = 6.254; p = 0.014) was observed. SDNN increased significantly during the intervention in both trials (Handholding trial: p = 0.002, Beside trial: p = 0.049).

Conclusions

Handholding improves autonomic functions of family caregivers and may function as self-care for family caregivers.

Trial registration

UMIN000020557. Registered on January 15, 2016.
Literature
1.
Spillers RL, Wellisch DK, Kim Y, Matthews BA, Baker F. Family caregivers and guilt in the context of cancer care. Psychosomatics. 2008;49:511–9.CrossRef
2.
Schellekens MPJ, Van den Hurk DGM, Prins JB, Donders ART, Molema J, Dekhuijzen R, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction added to care as usual for lung cancer patients and/or their partners: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology. 2017;26:2118–26.CrossRef
3.
Geng HM, Chuang DM, Yang F, Yang Y, Liu WM, Liu LH. et.al. Prevalence and determinants of depression in caregivers of cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysise. Medicine. 2018;97:e11863.
4.
Fu F, Zhao H, Tong F, Chi I. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to cancer caregivers. Front Psychol. 2017;8:834.CrossRef
5.
Sharpe L, Butow P, Smith C, McConnell D, Clarke S. The relationship between available support, unmet needs and caregiver burden in patients with advanced cancer and their carers. Psycho Oncol. 2005;14:102–14.CrossRef
6.
Oliveira D, Sousa L, Orrell M. Improving health-promoting self-care in family carers of people with dementia: a review of interventions. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:515–23.CrossRef
7.
Hasuo H, Kanbara K, Sakuma H, Yoshida K, Uchitani K, Fukunaga M. Self-care system for family caregivers of cancer patients using resonant breathing with a portable home device: A randomized open-label study. J Palliat Med. 2019;22:18–24.CrossRef
8.
Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Garst J, Baucom DH, McBride CM, McKee DC, et al. Caregiver-assisted coping skills training for lung cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41:1–13.CrossRef
9.
Ferrell B, Hanson J, Grant M. An overview and evaluation of the oncology family caregiver project: improving quality of life and quality of care for oncology family caregivers. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22:1645–52.CrossRef
10.
Kukimoto Y, Ooe N, Ideguchi N. The effects of massage therapy on pain and anxiety after surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2017;18:378–90.CrossRef
11.
vanderVaart S, Gijsen VM, de Wildt SN, Koren G. A systematic review of the therapeutic effects of Reiki. J Altern Complement Med. 2009;15:1157–69.CrossRef
12.
Hasuo H, Kanbara K, Abe T, Saigusa M, lshihara A, Fukunaga M. The efficacy of the family’s handholding in the patients. Psychosom Med. 2012;52:134–40.
13.
Hasuo H, Kanbara K, Mizuno M, Nishiyama J, Fukunaga M, Yunoki M. A family caregiver’s relaxation enhances the gastric motility function of the patient: A crossover study. Biopsychosoc Med. 2015;9:1–6.CrossRef
14.
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354–81.CrossRef
15.
Pomeranz B, Macaulay RJB, Caudill MA, Kutz I, Adam D, Gordon D, et al. Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:H151-3.PubMed
16.
Arai Y, Saul JP, Albrecht P, Hartley LH, Lilly LS, Cohen RJ, et al. Modulation of cardiac autonomic activity during and immediately after exercise. Am J Physiol. 1989;25:H132-41.
17.
Sakakibara M, Takeuchi S, Hayano J. Effect of relaxation training on cardiac parasympathetic tone. Psychophysiology. 1994;31:223–8.CrossRef
18.
Nunan D, Sandercock GR, Brodie DA. A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33:1407–17.CrossRef
19.
Zubrod CG, Schneiderman M, Frei E, Brindley C, Lennard Gold GL, Shnider B, et al. Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis. 1960;11:7–33.CrossRef
20.
Lai HL, Li YM, Lee LH. Effects of music intervention with nursing presence and recordea music on psychophysiological indices of cancer patient caregivers. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21:745–56.CrossRef
21.
Iwamura Y. Neuropsychology collection touch. Igaku-Shoin Ltd.; 2001. pp. 208–28.
22.
Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT, Quigley KS. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: autonomic origins physiological mechanism, and psychophysiological implications. Psychophysiology. 1993;30:183–96.CrossRef
23.
Madwed JB, Alberecht P, Mark RG, Cohen RJ. Low-frequency oscillation in arterial pressure and heart rate: A simple computer model. Am J Physiol. 1991;256:1573–9.
24.
Grasso R, Schena F, Gulli G, Cevese A. Dose low frequency variability if heart period reflect a specific parasympathetic mechanism? J Auton Nerv Syst. 1997;63:30–8.CrossRef
25.
Anderson JG, Taylor AG. Effects of healing touch in clinical practice: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J Holist Nurs. 2011;29:221–8.CrossRef
26.
Sato A, Sato Y, Schmidt RF. The impact of somatosensory input on autonomic functions. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1997;130:1–328.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of handholding on heart rate variability in both patients with cancer and their family caregivers: a randomized crossover study
Authors
Hiroko Sakuma
Hideaki Hasuo
Mikihiko Fukunaga
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1751-0759
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-021-00217-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BioPsychoSocial Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research

Factors influencing post-ICU psychological distress in family members of critically ill patients: a linear mixed-effects model

Review

Possible role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of anorexia nervosa

Correction

Correction to: The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the daily record of severity of problems (J-DRSP) and development of a short-form version (J-DRSP (SF)) to assess symptoms of premenstrual syndrome among Japanese women

Short report

Efficacy of rikkosan for primary burning mouth syndrome: a retrospective study

Research

Health-related benefits and adverse events associated with yoga classes among participants that are healthy, in poor health, or with chronic diseases

Research

Mental health and sleep habits/problems in children aged 3–4 years: a population study