Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 1/2023

14-11-2022 | Care | Reports of Original Investigations

Assessment of the reliability of virtual preanesthetic airway evaluation compared to traditional in-person airway evaluation: a prospective observational study

Authors: Mars Y. Zhao, BSc, James Macaskill, BSc, William McKay, MD, Peter Hedlin, MD, Erin Barbour-Tuck, PhD, Mary E. Walker, PhD, Jonathan Gamble, MD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Airway evaluation is a fundamental component of the preanesthetic examination. Virtual care has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the reliability of a virtual preanesthetic airway evaluation compared with a traditional in-person airway evaluation.

Methods

This prospective observational study compared the inter-rater agreement of an in-person airway evaluation performed by a consultant anesthesiologist with a virtual airway evaluation (VAE) performed by consultant anesthesiologists and medical students. The airway evaluation was completed using a comprehensive airway evaluation and scoring tool. The primary outcome was the inter-rater agreement of total scores between in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations and the VAEs of both the anesthesiologists and medical students, assessed using Cohen’s Kappa (CK). Secondary outcomes included the inter-rater agreement for each airway evaluation component between the in-person anesthesiologists and both the anesthesiologist and medical student VAEs, assessed using prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted Kappa.

Results

One hundred out of 111 participants completed all three evaluations. The in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations had fair and good levels of agreement of total scores with the VAEs of the anesthesiologists (CK, 0.21; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.07 to 0.34) and the medical students (CK, 0.74; 97.5% CI, 0.62 to 0.86), respectively. One participant was reported to have a difficult intubation.

Conclusion

Virtual airway evaluations performed by anesthesiologists and medical students had fair and good inter-rater agreement, respectively, with in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations. Further study with a focus on patients with difficult airways is required to define the predictive value of VAEs regarding difficult intubations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer058 Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617–31. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​bja/​aer058
14.
go back to reference Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
16.
Metadata
Title
Assessment of the reliability of virtual preanesthetic airway evaluation compared to traditional in-person airway evaluation: a prospective observational study
Authors
Mars Y. Zhao, BSc
James Macaskill, BSc
William McKay, MD
Peter Hedlin, MD
Erin Barbour-Tuck, PhD
Mary E. Walker, PhD
Jonathan Gamble, MD
Publication date
14-11-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-022-02345-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 1/2023 Go to the issue