Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

Development of the Woman-Centred Care Scale- Midwife Self Report (WCCS-MSR)

Authors: Deborah L. Davis, Debra K. Creedy, Zoe Bradfield, Elizabeth Newnham, Marjorie Atchan, Lorna Davie, Judith McAra-Couper, Kristen Graham, Christine Griffiths, Linda Sweet, Virginia Stulz

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Woman-centred care is recognised as a fundamental construct of midwifery practice yet to date, there has been no validated tool available to measure it. This study aims to develop and test a self-report tool to measure woman-centred care in midwives.

Methods

A staged approach was used for tool development including deductive methods to generate items, testing content validity with a group of experts, and psychometrically testing the instrument with a sample drawn from the target audience. The draft 58 item tool was distributed in an online survey using professional networks in Australia and New Zealand. Testing included item analysis, principal components analysis with direct oblimin rotation and subscale analysis, and internal consistency reliability.

Results

In total, 319 surveys were returned. Analysis revealed five factors explaining 47.6% of variance. Items were reduced to 40. Internal consistency (.92) was high but varied across factors. Factors reflected the extent to which a midwife meets the woman’s unique needs; balances the woman’s needs within the context of the maternity service; ensures midwifery philosophy underpins practice; uses evidence to inform collaborative practice; and works in partnership with the woman.

Conclusion

The Woman-Centred Care Scale-Midwife Self Report is the first step in developing a valid and reliable tool to enable midwives to self-assess their woman-centredness. Further research in alternate populations and refinement is warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leap N. Woman-centred or women-centred care: does it matter? Br J Midwifery. 2009;17(1):12–6.CrossRef Leap N. Woman-centred or women-centred care: does it matter? Br J Midwifery. 2009;17(1):12–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Midwifery Council of New Zealand. Competencies for entry to the register of midwives. Wellingtond: Midwifery Council of New Zealand; 2007. Midwifery Council of New Zealand. Competencies for entry to the register of midwives. Wellingtond: Midwifery Council of New Zealand; 2007.
5.
go back to reference Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council. Midwife Accreditation Standards. Canberra: Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council; 2014. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council. Midwife Accreditation Standards. Canberra: Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council; 2014.
6.
go back to reference Midwifery Council of New Zealand. Standards for approval of pre-registration midwifery education programmes and accreditation of tertiary education organisations. New Zealand: Midwifery Council; 2019. Midwifery Council of New Zealand. Standards for approval of pre-registration midwifery education programmes and accreditation of tertiary education organisations. New Zealand: Midwifery Council; 2019.
9.
go back to reference Department of Health. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Pregnancy Care In: Health Do, editor. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Health 2019. Department of Health. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Pregnancy Care In: Health Do, editor. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Health 2019.
10.
go back to reference Department of Health. Woman-centred care. Strategic directions for Australian maternity services. Canberra: Department of Health; 2019. Department of Health. Woman-centred care. Strategic directions for Australian maternity services. Canberra: Department of Health; 2019.
11.
go back to reference Royal College of Midwives. High Quality Midwifery Care. London: Royal College of Midwives; 2014. p. 32. Royal College of Midwives. High Quality Midwifery Care. London: Royal College of Midwives; 2014. p. 32.
14.
go back to reference Lundgren I, Berg M, Nilsson C, Olafsdottir OA. Health professionals’ perceptions of a midwifery model of woman-centred care implemented on a hospital labour ward. Women Birth. 2019. Lundgren I, Berg M, Nilsson C, Olafsdottir OA. Health professionals’ perceptions of a midwifery model of woman-centred care implemented on a hospital labour ward. Women Birth. 2019.
15.
go back to reference Bradfield Z, Hauck Y, Duggan R, Kelly M. Midwives’ perceptions of being ‘with woman’: a phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):363.CrossRef Bradfield Z, Hauck Y, Duggan R, Kelly M. Midwives’ perceptions of being ‘with woman’: a phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):363.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maputle MS, Donavon H. Woman-centred care in childbirth: A concept analysis (Part 1). Curationis. 2013;36(1):E1-8.PubMed Maputle MS, Donavon H. Woman-centred care in childbirth: A concept analysis (Part 1). Curationis. 2013;36(1):E1-8.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Brady S, Lee N, Gibbons K, Bogossian F. Woman-centred care: An integrative review of the empirical literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;94:107–19.CrossRef Brady S, Lee N, Gibbons K, Bogossian F. Woman-centred care: An integrative review of the empirical literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;94:107–19.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hunter A, Devane D, Houghton C, Grealish A, Tully A, Smith V. Woman-centred care during pregnancy and birth in Ireland: thematic analysis of women’s and clinicians’ experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):322.CrossRef Hunter A, Devane D, Houghton C, Grealish A, Tully A, Smith V. Woman-centred care during pregnancy and birth in Ireland: thematic analysis of women’s and clinicians’ experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):322.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Iida M, Horiuchi S, Porter SE. The relationship between women-centred care and women’s birth experiences: A comparison between birth centres, clinics, and hospitals in Japan. Midwifery. 2012;28(4):458–65.CrossRef Iida M, Horiuchi S, Porter SE. The relationship between women-centred care and women’s birth experiences: A comparison between birth centres, clinics, and hospitals in Japan. Midwifery. 2012;28(4):458–65.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ebert L, Bellchambers H, Ferguson A, Browne J. Socially disadvantaged women’s views of barriers to feeling safe to engage in decision-making in maternity care. Women Birth. 2014;27(2):132–7.CrossRef Ebert L, Bellchambers H, Ferguson A, Browne J. Socially disadvantaged women’s views of barriers to feeling safe to engage in decision-making in maternity care. Women Birth. 2014;27(2):132–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Slater P, McCance T, McCormack B. The development and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S). Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(4):541–7.CrossRef Slater P, McCance T, McCormack B. The development and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S). Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(4):541–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wilberforce M, Challis D, Davies L, Kelly MP, Roberts C. The preliminary measurement properties of the person-centred community care inventory (PERCCI). Qual Lfe Res. 2018;27(10):2745–56.CrossRef Wilberforce M, Challis D, Davies L, Kelly MP, Roberts C. The preliminary measurement properties of the person-centred community care inventory (PERCCI). Qual Lfe Res. 2018;27(10):2745–56.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brady S, Bogossian F, Gibbons K. Development and piloting the Woman Centred Care Scale (WCCS). Women Birth. 2017;30(3):220–6.CrossRef Brady S, Bogossian F, Gibbons K. Development and piloting the Woman Centred Care Scale (WCCS). Women Birth. 2017;30(3):220–6.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference DeVellis R. Scale development: Theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2017. DeVellis R. Scale development: Theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2017.
26.
go back to reference Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149-. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149-.
27.
go back to reference Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–67.CrossRef Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–67.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kline P. Psychometrics and Psychology. London, UK: Academic Press; 1979. Kline P. Psychometrics and Psychology. London, UK: Academic Press; 1979.
29.
go back to reference Osborne J, Costello A. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. PPMR. 2009;12(2):131–46. Osborne J, Costello A. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. PPMR. 2009;12(2):131–46.
30.
go back to reference Qualtrics. Qualtrics. Provo, Utah, USA: Qualtrics; 2019. Qualtrics. Qualtrics. Provo, Utah, USA: Qualtrics; 2019.
31.
go back to reference Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. 2005;10(1):7. Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. 2005;10(1):7.
32.
go back to reference Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. UK: University of Sussex; 2013. Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. UK: University of Sussex; 2013.
33.
go back to reference Australian Department of Health. 2017 Australia’s Future Health Workforce - Midwifery Australian Department of Health 2019 [Available from: https://www1.health.gov.au. Accessed 16 June 2021. Australian Department of Health. 2017 Australia’s Future Health Workforce - Midwifery Australian Department of Health 2019 [Available from: https://​www1.​health.​gov.​au. Accessed 16 June 2021.
35.
go back to reference Solomon BJ, Tobin KG, Schutte GM. Examining the Reliability and Validity of the Effective Behavior Support Self-Assessment Survey. Educ Treat Children. 2015;38(2):175–92.CrossRef Solomon BJ, Tobin KG, Schutte GM. Examining the Reliability and Validity of the Effective Behavior Support Self-Assessment Survey. Educ Treat Children. 2015;38(2):175–92.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference DiStefano C, Zhu M, Mîndrilã D. Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2009;14(20). DiStefano C, Zhu M, Mîndrilã D. Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2009;14(20).
37.
go back to reference Bradfield Z, Hauck Y, Kelly M, Duggan R. “It’s what midwifery is all about”: Western Australian midwives’ experiences of being ‘with woman’ during labour and birth in the known midwife model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):29.CrossRef Bradfield Z, Hauck Y, Kelly M, Duggan R. “It’s what midwifery is all about”: Western Australian midwives’ experiences of being ‘with woman’ during labour and birth in the known midwife model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):29.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fahy K, Foureur M, Hastie C. Birth territory and midwifery guardianship. Edinburgh: Books for Midwives. Edinburgh: Books for Midwives; 2008. Fahy K, Foureur M, Hastie C. Birth territory and midwifery guardianship. Edinburgh: Books for Midwives. Edinburgh: Books for Midwives; 2008.
39.
go back to reference Crowther S, Hall J. Spirituality and spiritual care in and around childbirth. Women Birth. 2015;28(2):173–8.CrossRef Crowther S, Hall J. Spirituality and spiritual care in and around childbirth. Women Birth. 2015;28(2):173–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Walsh D. Subverting the assembly-line: Childbirth in a free-standing birth centre. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(6):1330–40.CrossRef Walsh D. Subverting the assembly-line: Childbirth in a free-standing birth centre. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(6):1330–40.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Reiger K, Morton C. Standardizing or Individualizing? A Critical Analysis of the “Discursive Imaginaries” Shaping Maternity Care Reform. Int J Childbirth. 2012;2(3):173–86.CrossRef Reiger K, Morton C. Standardizing or Individualizing? A Critical Analysis of the “Discursive Imaginaries” Shaping Maternity Care Reform. Int J Childbirth. 2012;2(3):173–86.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Page L, Newnham E. Humanisation of childbirth 8: Where do we go from here? Practising Midwife. 2020;23(4). Page L, Newnham E. Humanisation of childbirth 8: Where do we go from here? Practising Midwife. 2020;23(4).
43.
go back to reference Sidebotham M, Fenwick J, Rath S, Gamble J. Midwives’ perceptions of their role within the context of maternity service reform: An Appreciative Inquiry. Women Birth. 2015;28(2):112–20.CrossRef Sidebotham M, Fenwick J, Rath S, Gamble J. Midwives’ perceptions of their role within the context of maternity service reform: An Appreciative Inquiry. Women Birth. 2015;28(2):112–20.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bedwell C, McGowan L, Lavender DT. Factors affecting midwives׳ confidence in intrapartum care: A phenomenological study. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):170–6.CrossRef Bedwell C, McGowan L, Lavender DT. Factors affecting midwives׳ confidence in intrapartum care: A phenomenological study. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):170–6.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Miller S, Bear RJ. Midwifery partnership. In: Pairman S, Tracy S, Dahlen H, Dixon L, editors. Midwifery: Preparation for practice 4e. Sydney: Elsevier; 2019. p. 299–326. Miller S, Bear RJ. Midwifery partnership. In: Pairman S, Tracy S, Dahlen H, Dixon L, editors. Midwifery: Preparation for practice 4e. Sydney: Elsevier; 2019. p. 299–326.
48.
go back to reference Andrich D. Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Med Care. 2004;42(1 Suppl):I7-16.CrossRef Andrich D. Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Med Care. 2004;42(1 Suppl):I7-16.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of the Woman-Centred Care Scale- Midwife Self Report (WCCS-MSR)
Authors
Deborah L. Davis
Debra K. Creedy
Zoe Bradfield
Elizabeth Newnham
Marjorie Atchan
Lorna Davie
Judith McAra-Couper
Kristen Graham
Christine Griffiths
Linda Sweet
Virginia Stulz
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03987-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021 Go to the issue