Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 6/2020

Open Access 01-06-2020 | Care | Original Research Article

Development of Population Tariffs for the CarerQol Instrument for Hungary, Poland and Slovenia: A Discrete Choice Experiment Study to Measure the Burden of Informal Caregiving

Authors: Petra Baji, Miklós Farkas, Dominik Golicki, Valentina Prevolnik Rupel, Renske Hoefman, Werner B. F. Brouwer, Job van Exel, Zsombor Zrubka, László Gulácsi, Márta Péntek

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The CarerQol instrument can be used in economic evaluations to measure the care-related quality of life of informal caregivers. Tariff sets are available for Australia, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, the UK, and the USA.

Objective

Our objective was to develop tariff sets for the CarerQol instrument for Hungary, Poland and Slovenia and to compare these with the existing value sets.

Methods

Discrete-choice experiments were carried out in Hungary, Poland and Slovenia. Data were collected through an online survey between November 2018 and January 2019, using representative samples of 1000 respondents per country. Tariffs were calculated from coefficient estimates from panel mixed multinomial logit models with random parameters.

Results

All seven CarerQol domains contributed significantly to the utility associated with different caregiving situations. Attributes valued highest were ‘physical health’ (tariffs for no problems were 15.6–21.8), ‘mental health’ (18.1–18.9) and ‘fulfilment’ (16.3–22.9). Value sets were comparable across the countries, although in Poland ‘a lot of fulfilment’ was valued higher (22.9) than in Hungary (16.3) and Slovenia (17.1). Compared with existing value sets, in the three Central European countries, ‘fulfilment’ was more important, whereas ‘financial problems’ were less important.

Conclusion

For the first time in the Central and Eastern European region, country-specific tariffs are now available for the Hungarian, Polish and Slovenian versions of the CarerQol instrument. This facilitates inclusion of the impact of informal care in economic evaluations. Our results can be used to develop and evaluate country-specific health policy strategies to support informal caregivers. The differences found in informal care preferences highlight the limited transferability of CarerQol tariffs across European regions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Pendergrass A, Mittelman M, Graessel E, Özbe D, Karg N. Predictors of the personal benefits and positive aspects of informal caregiving. Aging Ment Health. 2019;23(11):1533–8.CrossRef Pendergrass A, Mittelman M, Graessel E, Özbe D, Karg N. Predictors of the personal benefits and positive aspects of informal caregiving. Aging Ment Health. 2019;23(11):1533–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brouwer WB, van Exel NJA, van den Berg B, van den Bos GA, Koopmanschap MA. Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring. Health Policy. 2005;74(1):85–99.CrossRef Brouwer WB, van Exel NJA, van den Berg B, van den Bos GA, Koopmanschap MA. Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring. Health Policy. 2005;74(1):85–99.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Van Exel J, Bobinac A, Koopmanschap M, Brouwer W. The invisible hands made visible: recognizing the value of informal care in healthcare decision-making. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008;8(6):557–61.CrossRef Van Exel J, Bobinac A, Koopmanschap M, Brouwer W. The invisible hands made visible: recognizing the value of informal care in healthcare decision-making. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008;8(6):557–61.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bobinac A, van Exel NJ, Rutten FF, Brouwer WB. Health effects in significant others: separating family and care-giving effects. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(2):292–8.CrossRef Bobinac A, van Exel NJ, Rutten FF, Brouwer WB. Health effects in significant others: separating family and care-giving effects. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(2):292–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brouwer WBF. The inclusion of spillover effects in economic evaluations: not an optional extra. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37(4):451–6.CrossRef Brouwer WBF. The inclusion of spillover effects in economic evaluations: not an optional extra. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37(4):451–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hoefman RJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. How to include informal care in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1105–19.CrossRef Hoefman RJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. How to include informal care in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1105–19.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dixon S, Walker M, Salek S. Incorporating carer effects into economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(1):43–53.CrossRef Dixon S, Walker M, Salek S. Incorporating carer effects into economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(1):43–53.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Al-Janabi H, McCaffrey N, Ratcliffe J. Carer preferences in economic evaluation and healthcare decision making. Patient. 2013;6(4):235–9.CrossRef Al-Janabi H, McCaffrey N, Ratcliffe J. Carer preferences in economic evaluation and healthcare decision making. Patient. 2013;6(4):235–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brouwer WB, van Exel NJ, van Gorp B, Redekop WK. The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(6):1005–21.CrossRef Brouwer WB, van Exel NJ, van Gorp B, Redekop WK. The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(6):1005–21.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hoefman RJ, van Exel NJ, Looren de Jong S, Redekop WK, Brouwer WB. A new test of the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument: measuring the impact of informal care giving. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(6):875–87.CrossRef Hoefman RJ, van Exel NJ, Looren de Jong S, Redekop WK, Brouwer WB. A new test of the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument: measuring the impact of informal care giving. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(6):875–87.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hoefman RJ, van Exel J, Brouwer WBF. Measuring care-related quality of life of caregivers for use in economic evaluations: CarerQol tariffs for Australia, Germany, Sweden, UK, and US. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(4):469–78.CrossRef Hoefman RJ, van Exel J, Brouwer WBF. Measuring care-related quality of life of caregivers for use in economic evaluations: CarerQol tariffs for Australia, Germany, Sweden, UK, and US. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(4):469–78.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hoefman RJ, van Exel J, Rose JM, van de Wetering EJ, Brouwer WB. A discrete choice experiment to obtain a tariff for valuing informal care situations measured with the CarerQol instrument. Med Decis Mak. 2014;34(1):84–96.CrossRef Hoefman RJ, van Exel J, Rose JM, van de Wetering EJ, Brouwer WB. A discrete choice experiment to obtain a tariff for valuing informal care situations measured with the CarerQol instrument. Med Decis Mak. 2014;34(1):84–96.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Riedel M, Kraus M. Informal care provision in Europe: regulation and profile of providers. ENEPRI Research Report No 96; CEPS; 2011. Riedel M, Kraus M. Informal care provision in Europe: regulation and profile of providers. ENEPRI Research Report No 96; CEPS; 2011.
16.
go back to reference Baji P, Golicki D, Prevolnik-Rupel V, Brouwer WBF, Zrubka Z, Gulacsi L, et al. The burden of informal caregiving in Hungary, Poland and Slovenia: results from national representative surveys. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(Suppl 1):5–16.CrossRef Baji P, Golicki D, Prevolnik-Rupel V, Brouwer WBF, Zrubka Z, Gulacsi L, et al. The burden of informal caregiving in Hungary, Poland and Slovenia: results from national representative surveys. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(Suppl 1):5–16.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hensher DA, Greene WH. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation. 2003;30(2):133–76.CrossRef Hensher DA, Greene WH. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation. 2003;30(2):133–76.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Train KE. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Train KE. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
19.
go back to reference Green C, Brazier J, Deverill M. Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17(2):151–65.CrossRef Green C, Brazier J, Deverill M. Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17(2):151–65.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Goldberg-Looney LD, Perrin PB, Morlett-Paredes A, Mickens MN. College-age adults’ religiosity, family functioning and values, and willingness to provide care for a relative with a chronic health condition. Rehabil Psychol. 2017;62(2):100–9.CrossRef Goldberg-Looney LD, Perrin PB, Morlett-Paredes A, Mickens MN. College-age adults’ religiosity, family functioning and values, and willingness to provide care for a relative with a chronic health condition. Rehabil Psychol. 2017;62(2):100–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yoon KH, Moon YS, Lee Y, Choi SH, Moon SY, Seo SW, et al. The moderating effect of religiosity on caregiving burden and depressive symptoms in caregivers of patients with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(1):141–7.CrossRef Yoon KH, Moon YS, Lee Y, Choi SH, Moon SY, Seo SW, et al. The moderating effect of religiosity on caregiving burden and depressive symptoms in caregivers of patients with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(1):141–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jakubczyk M, Golicki D, Niewada M. The impact of a belief in life after death on health-state preferences: True difference or artifact? Qual Life Res. 2016;25(12):2997–3008.CrossRef Jakubczyk M, Golicki D, Niewada M. The impact of a belief in life after death on health-state preferences: True difference or artifact? Qual Life Res. 2016;25(12):2997–3008.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Janssen B, Szende A. Population Norms for the EQ-5D. In: Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J, editors. Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D, Dordrecht. 2014. p. 19–30. Janssen B, Szende A. Population Norms for the EQ-5D. In: Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J, editors. Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D, Dordrecht. 2014. p. 19–30.
25.
go back to reference Golicki D, Niewada M. General population reference values for 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire in Poland. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015;125(1–2):18–26.PubMed Golicki D, Niewada M. General population reference values for 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire in Poland. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015;125(1–2):18–26.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Péntek M, Hajdu O, Rencz F, Beretzky Z, Brodszky V, Baji P, et al. Subjective expectations regarding ageing: a cross-sectional online population survey in Hungary. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(Suppl. 1):17–30.CrossRef Péntek M, Hajdu O, Rencz F, Beretzky Z, Brodszky V, Baji P, et al. Subjective expectations regarding ageing: a cross-sectional online population survey in Hungary. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(Suppl. 1):17–30.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Versteegh M, Brouwer W. Patient and general public preferences for health states: a call to reconsider current guidelines. Soc Sci Med. 2016;165:66–74.CrossRef Versteegh M, Brouwer W. Patient and general public preferences for health states: a call to reconsider current guidelines. Soc Sci Med. 2016;165:66–74.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of Population Tariffs for the CarerQol Instrument for Hungary, Poland and Slovenia: A Discrete Choice Experiment Study to Measure the Burden of Informal Caregiving
Authors
Petra Baji
Miklós Farkas
Dominik Golicki
Valentina Prevolnik Rupel
Renske Hoefman
Werner B. F. Brouwer
Job van Exel
Zsombor Zrubka
László Gulácsi
Márta Péntek
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Care
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00899-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

PharmacoEconomics 6/2020 Go to the issue