Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2022

01-03-2022 | Care | Original Research

Patient Experience with In-Person and Telehealth Visits Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Integrated Health System in the United States

Authors: Ron D. Hays, PhD, Samuel A. Skootsky, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Information about telehealth versus in-office visits and how patient experience before compared to during the COVID-19 pandemic is important for healthcare planning.

Objective

To compare patient experience by visit type and before and during the pandemic.

Design

Survey of patients assessing ambulatory care before and during the pandemic.

Participants

A total of 58,500 adult patients (13,928 primary care and 44,581 specialty physician visits) at a large integrated health system with 197 clinics on the west coast of the United States. The majority were female (59%), 55 or older (65%), and non-Hispanic White (55%), and had an in-office visit (87%) while 10% had a tele-video and 3% a phone visit.

Main Measures

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Survey 3.0 doctor communication, care coordination, access, and office staff composites; an overall rating of the doctor; and whether the patient would recommend the doctor to family and friends.

Key Results

Patient experience with telehealth visits was as positive as or more positive than that with traditional office-based visits. Doctor communication on tele-video visits was viewed as slightly more positive than that of in-office or phone visits. Tele-video visits were also slightly more positive than in-office visits for care coordination, overall rating of the doctor, and willingness to recommend to family and friends. Office staff were viewed less positively on the phone than tele-video or in-office visits. Patient experience was similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., on a 0–100 possible range with a higher score being better, doctor communication was 94.4 before and 94.9 during).

Conclusions

The positive experiences with telehealth, especially tele-video, may be due to patient appreciation of efforts made to maintain access, the focused nature of telehealth visits, and help by staff for navigation technical issues. Lessons learned about delivering responsive telehealth care can be used to ensure high-quality care after the pandemic.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nash IS. Why physicians hate “patient satisfaction” but shouldn’t. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(10):792-93.CrossRef Nash IS. Why physicians hate “patient satisfaction” but shouldn’t. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(10):792-93.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Quigley DD, Mendel PJ, Predmore ZS, Chen AY, Hays RD. Use of CAHPS® patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative. J Healthc Leadersh. 2015;7:41–54.PubMedPubMedCentral Quigley DD, Mendel PJ, Predmore ZS, Chen AY, Hays RD. Use of CAHPS® patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative. J Healthc Leadersh. 2015;7:41–54.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, Sauvigne A, Baribeau P, Welch HG. Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. JAMA. 1992;267(13):1788-93. Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, Sauvigne A, Baribeau P, Welch HG. Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. JAMA. 1992;267(13):1788-93.
7.
go back to reference Wasson JH. Directory assistance for telephone care: A toll-free way to improve the quality of communication between patients, providers, and investigators. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(9):646–7. Wasson JH. Directory assistance for telephone care: A toll-free way to improve the quality of communication between patients, providers, and investigators. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(9):646–7.
8.
go back to reference Polinski JM, Barker T, Gagliano N, Sussman A, Brennan TA, Shrank WH. Patients' satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:269–75.CrossRef Polinski JM, Barker T, Gagliano N, Sussman A, Brennan TA, Shrank WH. Patients' satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:269–75.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Donelan K, Barreto EA, Sossong S, et al. Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25:40–44.PubMed Donelan K, Barreto EA, Sossong S, et al. Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25:40–44.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Zeltzer D, Einav L, Rashba J, Balicer RD. The impact of increased access to telemedicine. Working Paper 28,978. National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2021. Zeltzer D, Einav L, Rashba J, Balicer RD. The impact of increased access to telemedicine. Working Paper 28,978. National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2021.
11.
go back to reference Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):957–962.CrossRef Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):957–962.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, Testa PA, Nov O. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: Evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(7):1132–1135.CrossRef Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, Testa PA, Nov O. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: Evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(7):1132–1135.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ackerman SL, Gleason N, Shipman SA. Comparing patients' experiences with electronic and traditional consultation: Results from a multisite survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:1135–1142.CrossRef Ackerman SL, Gleason N, Shipman SA. Comparing patients' experiences with electronic and traditional consultation: Results from a multisite survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:1135–1142.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Miller MJ, Watson ES, Horberg MA, Bhatia M, Tripuraneni BR, McCarthy RJ. Patient experience after modifying visit delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care. 2021;27:e54-e63.PubMed Miller MJ, Watson ES, Horberg MA, Bhatia M, Tripuraneni BR, McCarthy RJ. Patient experience after modifying visit delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care. 2021;27:e54-e63.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Andrews E, Berghofer K, Long J, Prescott A, Caboral-Stevens M. Satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2020;2:100,008. Andrews E, Berghofer K, Long J, Prescott A, Caboral-Stevens M. Satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2020;2:100,008.
16.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.CrossRef Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kramer CY. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics. 1956;12:307–310CrossRef Kramer CY. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics. 1956;12:307–310CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tukey JW. The problem of multiple comparisons. In: Braun HI (ed) The Collected Works of John W. Tukey. Volume 8. London: Chapman & Hall; 1953. Tukey JW. The problem of multiple comparisons. In: Braun HI (ed) The Collected Works of John W. Tukey. Volume 8. London: Chapman & Hall; 1953.
19.
go back to reference Quigley DD, Elliott MN, Setodji CM et al. Quantifying magnitude of group-level differences in patient experience with health care. Health Serv Res. 2018; 53: 3027–3051.CrossRef Quigley DD, Elliott MN, Setodji CM et al. Quantifying magnitude of group-level differences in patient experience with health care. Health Serv Res. 2018; 53: 3027–3051.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Zhan T, Durst DA, Merkow RP, Sama PR, Bahaveolos SA, Chrisman HB. Comparison of patient experience with telehealth vs. in-person visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021;47(8):533–536 Bilimoria KY, Zhan T, Durst DA, Merkow RP, Sama PR, Bahaveolos SA, Chrisman HB. Comparison of patient experience with telehealth vs. in-person visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021;47(8):533–536
21.
go back to reference Groves R, Peytcheva E. The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 2008; 72:167–189.CrossRef Groves R, Peytcheva E. The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 2008; 72:167–189.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Klein DJ, Elliott MN, Haviland AM, et al. Understanding nonresponse to the 2007 Medicare CAHPS survey. Gerontologist. 2011;51:843–55.CrossRef Klein DJ, Elliott MN, Haviland AM, et al. Understanding nonresponse to the 2007 Medicare CAHPS survey. Gerontologist. 2011;51:843–55.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM, Goldstein E, et al. Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(2 Pt 1):501–18.CrossRef Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM, Goldstein E, et al. Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(2 Pt 1):501–18.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient Experience with In-Person and Telehealth Visits Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Integrated Health System in the United States
Authors
Ron D. Hays, PhD
Samuel A. Skootsky, MD
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07196-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine