Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2021

01-12-2021 | Care | Original Article

Lessons learned about virtual cancer care and distress screening in the time of COVID-19

Authors: Barry D. Bultz, Linda Watson

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer-related biopsychosocial distress is highly prevalent across the cancer care continuum. The implementation of screening patients for biopsychosocial distress has become a standard of practice in cancer care. With the presence of COVID-19, clinical care has shifted from in-person care to virtual care in many instances. One of the realities of COVID-19 is the significant decrease in screening patients for biopsychosocial symptom burden.

Methods

Given that screening for distress has become an accreditation standard in many cancer programs, in the province of Alberta, Canada, all patients are screened for distress with every visit to the cancer centre. Given the presence of COVID-19, much of cancer care has shifted to being delivered virtually (through mediums such as Zoom). In this paper, we present pre- and post-COVID data on the frequency of distress screening and its impact on patient care.

Results

A review of pre- and post-COVID-19 screening for distress questionnaires revealed that patients who received virtual care were less satisfied in the areas of emotional support and received less resources and referrals to supportive care.

Conclusion

The rapid integration of virtual care without the inclusion of a standardized distress screening tool was akin to a natural experiment, as two groups (virtual and in-person clinic patients) received different levels of care and interventions. Without the inclusion of distress screening, the clinical conversation around symptoms is less likely to occur and results in fewer referrals to best practices in supportive care services. Lessons learned about virtual cancer care without distress screening in the time of COVID-19 demonstrates significantly fewer patients being screened for distress and subsequently has resulted in less supportive care referrals. Going forward, we must find ways to ensure that virtual cancer care continues to support distress screening and best patient-centric care.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Holland JC, Bultz BD (2007) The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5:3–7CrossRef Holland JC, Bultz BD (2007) The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5:3–7CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bultz BD, Loscalzo MJ, Clark KL (2012) Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign, as the connective tissue of health care systems: a roadmap to integrated interdisciplinary person-centred care. In: Grassi L, Riba M (eds) Clinical Psycho-Oncology: An International Perspective. Wiley, Oxford, pp 83–96CrossRef Bultz BD, Loscalzo MJ, Clark KL (2012) Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign, as the connective tissue of health care systems: a roadmap to integrated interdisciplinary person-centred care. In: Grassi L, Riba M (eds) Clinical Psycho-Oncology: An International Perspective. Wiley, Oxford, pp 83–96CrossRef
7.
go back to reference CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services (2015) Screening, identifying and responding to distress: Standard Operating Process. Policy. Alberta, Canada CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services (2015) Screening, identifying and responding to distress: Standard Operating Process. Policy. Alberta, Canada
8.
go back to reference Accreditation Canada (2016) CCHSA’s Qmentum Accreditation Program: Service Excellence - 2008, Sector and Service-based Standards, Cancer Care; Oncology Services. Report, Ver. 10. Canada Accreditation Canada (2016) CCHSA’s Qmentum Accreditation Program: Service Excellence - 2008, Sector and Service-based Standards, Cancer Care; Oncology Services. Report, Ver. 10. Canada
11.
13.
go back to reference Watson L, Groff S, Tamagawa R, Looyis J, Farkas S, Schaitel B, DeIure A, Faris P, Bultz BD. (2016) Evaluating the impact of provincial implementation of Screening for Distress on quality of life, symptom reports, and psychosocial well-being in patients with cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 14:164–172. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2016.0019 Watson L, Groff S, Tamagawa R, Looyis J, Farkas S, Schaitel B, DeIure A, Faris P, Bultz BD. (2016) Evaluating the impact of provincial implementation of Screening for Distress on quality of life, symptom reports, and psychosocial well-being in patients with cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 14:164–172. https://​doi.​org/​10.​6004/​jnccn.​2016.​0019
14.
go back to reference Tamagawa R, Groff S, Anderson J, Champ S, Deiure A, Looyis J, Faris P, Watson L. (2016) Effects of a provincial-wide implementation of Screening for Distress on healthcare professionals’ confidence and understanding of person-centered care in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2016.0135 Tamagawa R, Groff S, Anderson J, Champ S, Deiure A, Looyis J, Faris P, Watson L. (2016) Effects of a provincial-wide implementation of Screening for Distress on healthcare professionals’ confidence and understanding of person-centered care in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:1259–1266. https://​doi.​org/​10.​6004/​jnccn.​2016.​0135
18.
go back to reference Alberta Health Services, Cancer Care Alberta, Applied Research and Patient Experience, Cancer Research and Analytics (2020) Delivering cancer care virtually in Alberta: Evaluating virtual care during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Cancer Care Alberta (CCA): Considerations for a future virtual care strategy. Internal Report. Alberta, Canada Alberta Health Services, Cancer Care Alberta, Applied Research and Patient Experience, Cancer Research and Analytics (2020) Delivering cancer care virtually in Alberta: Evaluating virtual care during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Cancer Care Alberta (CCA): Considerations for a future virtual care strategy. Internal Report. Alberta, Canada
19.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Vijayaraghavan S, Wherton J, Shaw S, Byrne E, Campbell-Richards D, Bhattacharya S, Hanson P, Ramoutar S, Gutteridge C, Hodkinson I, Collard A, Morris J (2016) Virtual online consultations: Advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study. BMJ Open 6:e009388. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009388 Greenhalgh T, Vijayaraghavan S, Wherton J, Shaw S, Byrne E, Campbell-Richards D, Bhattacharya S, Hanson P, Ramoutar S, Gutteridge C, Hodkinson I, Collard A, Morris J (2016) Virtual online consultations: Advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study. BMJ Open 6:e009388. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2015-009388
Metadata
Title
Lessons learned about virtual cancer care and distress screening in the time of COVID-19
Authors
Barry D. Bultz
Linda Watson
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
Care
COVID-19
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06322-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine