Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Research article

Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors: Olena Mazurenko, Lindsey Sanner, Nate C. Apathy, Burke W. Mamlin, Nir Menachemi, Meredith C. B. Adams, Robert W. Hurley, Saura Fortin Erazo, Christopher A. Harle

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recruiting healthcare providers as research subjects often rely on in-person recruitment strategies. Little is known about recruiting provider participants via electronic recruitment methods. In this study, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe and evaluate a primarily electronic approach to recruiting primary care providers (PCPs) as subjects in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a decision support intervention.

Methods

We adapted an existing framework for healthcare provider research recruitment, employing an electronic consent form and a mix of brief synchronous video presentations, email, and phone calls to recruit PCPs into the RCT. To evaluate the success of each electronic strategy, we estimated the number of consented PCPs associated with each strategy, the number of days to recruit each PCP and recruitment costs.

Results

We recruited 45 of 63 eligible PCPs practicing at ten primary care clinic locations over 55 days. On average, it took 17 business days to recruit a PCP (range 0–48) and required three attempts (range 1–7). Email communication from the clinic leaders led to the most successful recruitments, followed by brief synchronous video presentations at regularly scheduled clinic meetings. We spent approximately $89 per recruited PCP. We faced challenges of low email responsiveness and limited opportunities to forge relationships.

Conclusion

PCPs can be efficiently recruited at low costs as research subjects using primarily electronic communications, even during a time of high workload and stress. Electronic peer leader outreach and synchronous video presentations may be particularly useful recruitment strategies.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.​gov, NCT04295135. Registered 04 March 2020.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wu J, Lewis ET, Barnett PG, Nevedal AL. Instant messaging: an innovative way to recruit primary care providers for qualitative research. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(5):1612–4.CrossRef Wu J, Lewis ET, Barnett PG, Nevedal AL. Instant messaging: an innovative way to recruit primary care providers for qualitative research. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(5):1612–4.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Asch S, Connor SE, Hamilton EG, Fox SA. Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(8):591–9.CrossRef Asch S, Connor SE, Hamilton EG, Fox SA. Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(8):591–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Johnston S, Liddy C, Hogg W, Donskov M, Russell G, Gyorfi-Dyke E. Barriers and facilitators to recruitment of physicians and practices for primary care health services research at one Centre. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):109.CrossRef Johnston S, Liddy C, Hogg W, Donskov M, Russell G, Gyorfi-Dyke E. Barriers and facilitators to recruitment of physicians and practices for primary care health services research at one Centre. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):109.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sahin D, Yaffe MJ, Sussman T, McCusker J. A mixed studies literature review of family physicians' participation in research. Fam Med. 2014;46(7):503–14.PubMed Sahin D, Yaffe MJ, Sussman T, McCusker J. A mixed studies literature review of family physicians' participation in research. Fam Med. 2014;46(7):503–14.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Riis A, Jensen CE, Maindal HT, Bro F, Jensen MB. Recruitment of general practices: is a standardised approach helpful in the involvement of healthcare professionals in research? SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116662802.CrossRef Riis A, Jensen CE, Maindal HT, Bro F, Jensen MB. Recruitment of general practices: is a standardised approach helpful in the involvement of healthcare professionals in research? SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116662802.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hysong SJ, Smitham KB, Knox M, Johnson K-E, SoRelle R, Haidet P. Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility. Implement Sci. 2013;8:125.CrossRef Hysong SJ, Smitham KB, Knox M, Johnson K-E, SoRelle R, Haidet P. Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility. Implement Sci. 2013;8:125.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hummers-Pradier E, Scheidt-Nave C, Martin H, Heinemann S, Kochen MM, Himmel W. Simply no time? Barriers to GPs’ participation in primary health care research. Fam Pract. 2008;25(2):105–12.CrossRef Hummers-Pradier E, Scheidt-Nave C, Martin H, Heinemann S, Kochen MM, Himmel W. Simply no time? Barriers to GPs’ participation in primary health care research. Fam Pract. 2008;25(2):105–12.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rothwell PM. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet. 2005;365(9454):176–86.CrossRef Rothwell PM. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet. 2005;365(9454):176–86.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7(1):9.CrossRef McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7(1):9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fulda KG, Hahn KA, Young RA, et al. Recruiting practice-based research network (PBRN) physicians to be research participants: lessons learned from the North Texas (NorTex) needs assessment study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(5):610–5.CrossRef Fulda KG, Hahn KA, Young RA, et al. Recruiting practice-based research network (PBRN) physicians to be research participants: lessons learned from the North Texas (NorTex) needs assessment study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(5):610–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Solberg LI. Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect. Implement Sci. 2006;1:25.CrossRef Solberg LI. Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect. Implement Sci. 2006;1:25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Morgantini LA, Naha U, Wang H, et al. Factors contributing to healthcare professional burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid turnaround global survey. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238217.CrossRef Morgantini LA, Naha U, Wang H, et al. Factors contributing to healthcare professional burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid turnaround global survey. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238217.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sharma M, Creutzfeldt CJ, Lewis A, et al. Health-care professionals' perceptions of critical care resource availability and factors associated with mental well-being during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): results from a US survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(10):e566–76.CrossRef Sharma M, Creutzfeldt CJ, Lewis A, et al. Health-care professionals' perceptions of critical care resource availability and factors associated with mental well-being during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): results from a US survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(10):e566–76.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sathian B, Asim M, Banerjee I, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials and clinical research: a systematic review. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2020;10(3):878–87.CrossRef Sathian B, Asim M, Banerjee I, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials and clinical research: a systematic review. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2020;10(3):878–87.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Broyles LM, Rodriguez KL, Price PA, Bayliss NK, Sevick MA. Overcoming barriers to the recruitment of nurses as participants in health care research. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(12):1705–18.CrossRef Broyles LM, Rodriguez KL, Price PA, Bayliss NK, Sevick MA. Overcoming barriers to the recruitment of nurses as participants in health care research. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(12):1705–18.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fagnan LJ, Walunas TL, Parchman ML, et al. Engaging primary care practices in studies of improvement: did you budget enough for practice recruitment? Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(Suppl 1):S72–9.CrossRef Fagnan LJ, Walunas TL, Parchman ML, et al. Engaging primary care practices in studies of improvement: did you budget enough for practice recruitment? Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(Suppl 1):S72–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Harle CA, Apathy NC, Cook RL, et al. Information needs and requirements for decision support in primary care: an analysis of chronic pain care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;2018:527–34.PubMedPubMedCentral Harle CA, Apathy NC, Cook RL, et al. Information needs and requirements for decision support in primary care: an analysis of chronic pain care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;2018:527–34.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. Jama; 2016;315(15):1624–45. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. Jama; 2016;315(15):1624–45.
20.
go back to reference Bower P, Brueton V, Gamble C, et al. Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities. Trials. 2014;15(1):399.CrossRef Bower P, Brueton V, Gamble C, et al. Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities. Trials. 2014;15(1):399.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chaudhari N, Ravi R, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: challenges and solutions. Perspect Clin Res. 2020;11(2):64–9.CrossRef Chaudhari N, Ravi R, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: challenges and solutions. Perspect Clin Res. 2020;11(2):64–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Goldman V, Dushkin A, Wexler DJ, et al. Effective recruitment for practice-based research: lessons from the REAL HEALTH-diabetes study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;15:100374.CrossRef Goldman V, Dushkin A, Wexler DJ, et al. Effective recruitment for practice-based research: lessons from the REAL HEALTH-diabetes study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;15:100374.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ngune I, Jiwa M, Dadich A, Lotriet J, Sriram D. Effective recruitment strategies in primary care research: a systematic review. Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(2):115–23.PubMed Ngune I, Jiwa M, Dadich A, Lotriet J, Sriram D. Effective recruitment strategies in primary care research: a systematic review. Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(2):115–23.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic
Authors
Olena Mazurenko
Lindsey Sanner
Nate C. Apathy
Burke W. Mamlin
Nir Menachemi
Meredith C. B. Adams
Robert W. Hurley
Saura Fortin Erazo
Christopher A. Harle
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Care
COVID-19
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01705-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Primary Care 1/2022 Go to the issue