Top

Published in:

13-06-2022 | Care | Scientific Contribution

Intergenerational contract in Ageing Democracies: sustainable Welfare Systems and the interests of future generations

Author: Ming-Jui Yeh

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 3/2022

Abstract

As the assumptions of perpetual economic and population growth no longer stand, the welfare systems built on such promises are in peril. Policymakers must reallocate the responsibility for providing care between generations. Democratic theories can help establish procedures for finding solutions, particularly in ageing democratic countries. By analysing existing representative and deliberative democratic theories, this paper explores how the interests of future generations could be included in such procedures. A hypothetical social health insurance scheme with the pay-as-you-go financial arrangement is selected as an illustrative case. This paper argues that due to the intrinsic bias towards the current generation, both representative and deliberative democratic health policymaking are limited in making decisions that account for future generations. Instead, their interests could be at best represented by benevolent representatives.

This presupposition sets the scope of this paper. One could rightly challenge the legitimacy of the intergenerational-transfer-welfare-arrangement as described in this paper and propose that a just social arrangement must remove welfare systems of this kind. While challenges of this sort have their merits, they are not the ethos in most of the developed countries (and even developing ones) and hence have fewer implications in the practical term. The legitimacy problem of welfare system is indeed worth comprehensive analysis. However, for the purpose of this paper, the analysis is limited to the scenarios where some degree of sustainability of the welfare system is ethically demanded.

However, for those immigrants who were naturalised as citizens (and typically lost the nationality of their countries of origin), the scene of signing a contract is more imaginable and not simply metaphoric.

The members of a democracy could opt out of such a contract by leaving the polity and being naturalised as a citizen of another. Should the contract be ethically unjustifiable to an extent, members could initiate a revolution to overthrow the illegitimate government. This is an extreme way of opting out of a contract.

While many of which are actually predictable by the mere fact regarding the ageing population structure and the transitioned mode of production and economy.

In the case of paternalistic constituents, they might also put their own concerns for the future generations into agendas and hold their representatives accountable.

Abelson, J., M. E. Warren, and P. G. Forest. 2012. The future of public deliberation on health issues. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 42 (2): 27–29.

Bawin-Legros, B., and J.-F. Stassen. 2002. Intergenerational Solidarity: Between the Family and the State. Current Sociology 50 (2): 243–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050002620.CrossRef

Burke, E. 1790. Reflections on the Revolution in France.

Cohen, J. 1997. Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. J. Bohman, and W. Rehg, 407–437. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

Conly, S. 2013. Coercive Paternalism in Health Care: Against Freedom of Choice. Public Health Ethics 6 (3): 241–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/pht025.CrossRef

Daatland, S. O., and A. Lowenstein. 2005. Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance. European Journal of Ageing 2 (3): 174–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-005-0001-1.CrossRef

Daniels, N. 1983. Justice between age groups: am I my parents’ keeper? The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 489–522.

Deng, C.-Y., and C.-L. Wu. 2010. An innovative participatory method for newly democratic societies: The “civic groups forum” on national health insurance reform in Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine, 70(6), 896–903. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795360900762X.

Dworkin, G. 2016. Paternalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paternalism/.

Ferguson, N. 2012. The Great Degeneration: How Institutions Decay and Economies Die. London and new York, NY: Allen Lane/Penguin.

Fineberg, H. V. 2012. A successful and sustainable health system—how to get there from here. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(11), 1020–1027. Retrieved from http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1114777.

Fleck, L. M. 1994. Just Caring: Oregon, Health Care Rationing, and Informed Democratic Deliberation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4): 367–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/19.4.367.CrossRef

Goodin, R. E. 1993. Democracy, Preferences and Paternalism. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 229–247. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4532289.

Gruen, R. L., J. H. Elliott, M. L. Nolan, P. D. Lawton, A. Parkhill, C. J. McLaren, and J. N. Lavis. 2008. Sustainability science: an integrated approach for health-programme planning. The Lancet, 372(9649), 1579–1589. Retrieved from http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0140673608616591/1-s2.0-S0140673608616591-main.pdf?_tid=09de8016-340d-11e4-b4a7-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1409819313_28957fbc02987f03051d2a524b24ea0a.

Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Henke, K.-D., and J. Schreyögg. 2004. Towards sustainable health care systems: Strategies in health insurance schemes in France, Germany, Japan and the Netherlands; a comparative study. Retrieved from.

Houtepen, R., and R. ter Meulen. 2000. New types of solidarity in the European welfare state. Health Care Analysis 8 (4): 329–340.CrossRef

Huang, C.-C. 2012. On Intergenerational Justice. Thought and Words: Journal of the hummanities and Social Sciences 50 (3): 185–209.

Kates, M. 2015. Justice, democracy, and future generations. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (5): 508–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.861655.CrossRef

Kotlikoff, L. J., and S. Burns. 2012. The Clash of Generations: Saving Ourselves, Our Kids, and Our Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kwon, S. 2009. Thirty years of national health insurance in South Korea: lessons for achieving universal health care coverage. Health Policy and Planning, 24(1), 63–71. Retrieved from http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/63.full.pdf.

Lee, Y.-J., W. L. Parish, and R. J. Willis. 1994. Sons, daughters, and intergenerational support in Taiwan. American journal of sociology 99 (4): 1010–1041.CrossRef

Lifvergren, S., P. Docherty, and A. B. R. Shani. 2011. Towards a sustainable healthcare system: Transformation through participation. Organizing for Sustainable Effectiveness 1: 99–125.CrossRef

Lin, K.-M., and D.-S. Chen. 2003. Citizen Conference and Deliberative Democracy: Citizen Participation in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Policies. Taiwanese Sociology(6), 62–118.

Manin, B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

Oberlander, J., T. Marmor, and L. Jacobs. 2001. Rationing medical care: rhetoric and reality in the Oregon Health Plan. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164(11), 1583–1587. Retrieved from http://www.cmaj.ca/content/164/11/1583.abstract.

Olsen, I. T. 1998. Sustainability of health care: a framework for analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 13(3), 287–295. Retrieved from http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/content/13/3/287.full.pdf.

Omoruan, A., A. Bamidele, and O. Phillips. 2009. Social health insurance and sustainable healthcare reform in Nigeria. Ethno Med 3 (2): 105–110.CrossRef

Van Parijs, P. 1998. The Disfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27 (4): 292–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00072.xCrossRef

Pilkington, B. C. 2016. Dignity, Health, and Membership: Who Counts as One of Us? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (2): 115–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhw001.CrossRef

Qiao, H. H. 2007. Will China Grow Old Before Getting Rich? In BRICs and Beyond, 45–58. The Goldman Sachs Group.

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cmabridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Reiman, J. 2007. Being Fair to Future People: The Non-Identity Problem in the Original Position. Philosophy & public affairs 35 (1): 69–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00099.x.CrossRef

Süssmuth, B., and R. K. von Weizsäcker. 2006. Institutional determinants of public debt: a political economy perspective. Handbook of intergenerational justice 23: 170–184.

Sandman, L., and C. Munthe. 2010. Shared Decision Making, Paternalism and Patient Choice. Health Care Analysis 18 (1): 60–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-008-0108-6.CrossRef

Shier, H. 2001. Pathways to Participation: Openings, Opportunities and Obligations. Children & society 15 (2): 107–117.CrossRef

Sinclair, R. 2004. Participation in practice: making it meaningful, effective and sustainable. Children & society 18 (2): 106–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.817.CrossRef

Solomon, S., and J. Abelson. 2012. Why and when should we use public deliberation? Hastings Center Report 42 (2): 17–20.CrossRef

Thompson, D. F. 2010. Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1): 17–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326232.CrossRef

UN. 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child. 20 November 1989. United Nations.

Yeh, M.-J. 2020. Discourse on the idea of sustainability: with policy implications for health and welfare reform. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 23: 155–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09937-z.CrossRef

Young, I. M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Title: Intergenerational contract in Ageing Democracies: sustainable Welfare Systems and the interests of future generations
Author: Ming-Jui Yeh
Publication date: 13-06-2022
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Keywords: Care
Climate Change
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10098-9

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Intergenerational contract in Ageing Democracies: sustainable Welfare Systems and the interests of future generations

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Historical empathy and medicine: Pathography and empathy in Sophocles’ Philoctetes

Personal identity, possible worlds, and medical ethics

Evaluating emotions in medical practice: a critical examination of ‘clinical detachment’ and emotional attunement in orthopaedic surgery

Solidarity and Public Health

The significance of Emmanuel Levinas’ ethics of responsibility for medical judgment

The principle of nondirectiveness in genetic counseling. Different meanings and various postulates of normative nature