Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Care | Research article

Continuing professional education for general practitioners on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: feasibility of a blended learning approach in Bangladesh

Authors: Md. Nazim Uzzaman, Tracy Jackson, Aftab Uddin, Neneh Rowa-Dewar, Mohammod Jobayer Chisti, G M Monsur Habib, Hilary Pinnock, RESPIRE Collaborators

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Continuing medical education (CME) is essential to developing and maintaining high quality primary care. Traditionally, CME is delivered face-to-face, but due to geographical distances, and pressure of work in Bangladesh, general practitioners (GPs) are unable to relocate for several days to attend training. Using chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as an exemplar, we aimed to assess the feasibility of blended learning (combination of face-to-face and online) for GPs, and explore trainees’ and trainers’ perspectives towards the blended learning approach.

Methods

We used a mixed-methods design. We trained 49 GPs in two groups via blended (n = 25) and traditional face-to-face approach (n = 24) and assessed their post-course knowledge and skills. The COPD Physician Practice Assessment Questionnaire (COPD-PPAQ) was administered before and one-month post-course. Verbatim transcriptions of focus group discussions with 18 course attendees and interviews with three course trainers were translated into English and analysed thematically.

Results

Forty GPs completed the course (Blended: 19; Traditional: 21). The knowledge and skills post course, and the improvement in self-reported adherence to COPD guidelines was similar in both groups. Most participants preferred blended learning as it was more convenient than taking time out of their busy work life, and for many the online learning optimised the benefits of the subsequent face-to-face sessions. Suggested improvements included online interactivity with tutors, improved user friendliness of the e-learning platform, and timing face-to-face classes over weekends to avoid time-out of practice.

Conclusions

Quality improvement requires a multifaceted approach, but adequate knowledge and skills are core components. Blended learning is feasible and, with a few caveats, is an acceptable option to GPs in Bangladesh. This is timely, given that online learning with limited face-to-face contact is likely to become the norm in the on-going COVID-19 pandemic.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Wong CH, Phoa S. The status of family medicine training programs in the Asia Pacific. Fam Med. 2016;48(3):194–202.
2.
Lee KP, Wong C, Chan D, Kung K, Luk L, Wong MCS, et al. Family medicine vocational training and career satisfaction in Hong Kong. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):139.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Ahmed SM, Hossain MA, Rajachowdhury AM, Bhuiya AU. The health workforce crisis in Bangladesh: shortage, inappropriate skill-mix and inequitable distribution. Hum Resour Health. 2011;9:3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
5.
Salim H, Lee PY, Ghazali SS, Ching SM, Ali H, Shamsuddin NH, et al. Perceptions toward a pilot project on blended learning in Malaysian family medicine postgraduate training: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):206.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Sandelowsky H, Krakau I, Modin S, Ställberg B, Nager A. COPD patients need more information about self-management: a cross-sectional study in Swedish primary care. Scand J Prim Health Car. 2019;37(4):459–67.CrossRef
7.
Bertella E, Zadra A, Vitacca M. COPD management in primary care: is an educational plan for GPs useful? Multidiscip Resp Med. 2013;8(1):24.CrossRef
8.
Ragaišienė G, Kibarskytė R, Gauronskaitė R, Giedraitytė M, Dapšauskaitė A, Kasiulevičius V, et al. Diagnosing COPD in primary care: what has real life practice got to do with guidelines? Multidiscip Resp Med. 2019;14(1):28.CrossRef
9.
Ho T, Cusack RP, Chaudhary N, Satia I, Kurmi OP. Under- and over-diagnosis of COPD: a global perspective. Breathe (Sheff). 2019;15(1):24–35.CrossRef
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Pinnock H, Thomas M, Tsiligianni I, Lisspers K, Østrem A, Ställberg B, et al. The international primary care respiratory group (IPCRG) research needs statement 2010. Prim Care Respir J. 2010;19(Suppl 1):S1–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Bösner S, Pickert J, Stibane T. Teaching differential diagnosis in primary care using an inverted classroom approach: student satisfaction and gain in skills and knowledge. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Lewin LO, Singh M, Bateman BL, Glover PB. Improving education in primary care: development of an online curriculum using the blended learning model. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9(1):33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Edginton A, Holbrook J. A blended learning approach to teaching basic pharmacokinetics and the significance of face-to-face interaction. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(5):88.
18.
De Leng BA, Dolmans DH, Muijtjens AM, Van Der Vleuten CP. Student perceptions of a virtual learning environment for a problem-based learning undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ. 2006;40(6):568–75.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Westerlaken M, Christiaans-Dingelhoff I, Filius RM, de Vries B, de Bruijne M, van Dam M. Blended learning for postgraduates; an interactive experience. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):289.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Uzzaman MN, Banu S, Habib GM, Hossain AE, Kabir MJ, Karim MR, et al. Improving Physicians’ capacity for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care through blended E-learning: a pilot study in Bangladesh. Cureus. 2018;10(12):e3808.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Güzer B, Caner H. The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;116:4596–603.CrossRef
22.
Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE guide 32: e-learning in medical education part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):455–73.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
25.
Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom clinical research network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Boulet LP, Devlin H, O'Donnell DE. The Physicians’ practice assessment questionnaire on asthma and COPD. Respir Med. 2011;105(1):8–14.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
28.
Lotrecchiano GR, McDonald P, Lyons L, Long T, Zajicek-Farber M. Blended learning: strengths, challenges, and lessons learned in an interprofessional training program. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(9):1725–34.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Bonk CJ, Olson TM, Wisher RA, Orvis KL. Learning from focus groups: an examination of blended learning. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance 2002;17(3):97–118.
30.
Gray K, Tobin J. Introducing an online community into a clinical education setting: a pilot study of student and staff engagement and outcomes using blended learning. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10(1):6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Te Pas E, Meinema JG, Visser MR, van Dijk N. Blended learning in CME: the perception of GP trainers. Educ Prim Care. 2016;27(3):217–24.CrossRef
32.
Lothridge K, Fox J, Fynan E. Blended learning: efficient, timely and cost effective. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2013;45(4):407–16.CrossRef
33.
Singh H. Building effective blended learning programs. Educ Technol. 2003;43(6):51–4.
34.
Harden RM. A new vision for distance learning and continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2005;25(1):43–51.CrossRef
35.
Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V. The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):e216–21.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Czerniewicz L, Brown C. The uses of information and communication (ICT) in teaching and learning in south African higher education practices in the Western cape : research : information and communication technologies. Perspect Educ. 2005;23(1):1–18.
37.
Siddiqui M, Bukhari AS, Shamael I, Shah ZA, Maken N. Facebook as a learning tool: perception of stroke unit nurses in a tertiary care hospital in Islamabad. Cureus. 2018;10(3):e2357.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Wilson T, Whitelock D. What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students? Comput Educ. 1998;30(3):259–69.CrossRef
39.
Alebaikan R, Troudi S. Online discussion in blended courses at Saudi universities. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):507–14.CrossRef
40.
Lord G, Lomicka L. Blended learning in teacher education: an investigation across media. Contemp Issues Technol Teach Educ. 2008;8(2):158–74.
41.
Rabe KF. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:532–55.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Lindberg A, Bjerg A, Ronmark E, Larsson LG, Lundback B. Prevalence and underdiagnosis of COPD by disease severity and the attributable fraction of smoking Report from the obstructive lung disease in northern Sweden studies. Respir Med. 2006;100(2):264–72.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Stallberg B, Janson C, Johansson G, Larsson K, Stratelis G, Telg G, et al. Management, morbidity and mortality of COPD during an 11-year period: an observational retrospective epidemiological register study in Sweden (PATHOS). Prim Care Respir J. 2014;23(1):38–45.PubMedCrossRef
44.
McDonnell J, Williams S, Ryan D, Pinnock H, de Sousa JC. Improving care for people with asthma: building capacity across a European network of primary care organisations–the IPCRG’s teach the teacher Programme. J Glob Health Rep. 2018;2:e2018026.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Continuing professional education for general practitioners on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: feasibility of a blended learning approach in Bangladesh
Authors
Md. Nazim Uzzaman
Tracy Jackson
Aftab Uddin
Neneh Rowa-Dewar
Mohammod Jobayer Chisti
G M Monsur Habib
Hilary Pinnock
RESPIRE Collaborators
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01270-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Primary Care 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research article

Substance use identification and follow-up rates among commercial and Medicare health insurance members in primary care and other settings

Research article

Clinical features in primary care electronic records before diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis: a nested case-control study

Research article

A pay for performance scheme in primary care: Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on the provider experiences of the quality and outcomes framework in the UK

Research article

Ultrasonography in assessing suspected bone fractures: a cross-sectional survey amongst German general practitioners

Research article

Person-centred and efficient care delivery for high-need, high-cost patients: primary care professionals’ experiences

Research article

Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation