Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Research

Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care

Authors: J. Knoop, W. van Lankveld, L. Beijer, F. J. B. Geerdink, M. W. Heymans, T. J. Hoogeboom, S. Hoppenbrouwers, E. van Overmeeren, R. Soer, C. Veenhof, K. C. P. Vissers, P. J. van der Wees, M. Sappelli, J. B. Staal

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While low back pain occurs in nearly everybody and is the leading cause of disability worldwide, we lack instruments to accurately predict persistence of acute low back pain. We aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning model predicting non-recovery in acute low back pain and to compare this with current practice and ‘traditional’ prediction modeling.

Methods

Prognostic cohort-study in primary care physiotherapy. Patients (n = 247) with acute low back pain (≤ one month) consulting physiotherapists were included. Candidate predictors were assessed by questionnaire at baseline and (to capture early recovery) after one and two weeks. Primary outcome was non-recovery after three months, defined as at least mild pain (Numeric Rating Scale > 2/10). Machine learning models to predict non-recovery were developed and internally validated, and compared with two current practices in physiotherapy (STarT Back tool and physiotherapists’ expectation) and ‘traditional’ logistic regression analysis.

Results

Forty-seven percent of the participants did not recover at three months. The best performing machine learning model showed acceptable predictive performance (area under the curve: 0.66). Although this was no better than a’traditional’ logistic regression model, it outperformed current practice.

Conclusions

We developed two prognostic models containing partially different predictors, with acceptable performance for predicting (non-)recovery in patients with acute LBP, which was better than current practice. Our prognostic models have the potential of integration in a clinical decision support system to facilitate data-driven, personalized treatment of acute low back pain, but needs external validation first.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA. 2010;303(13):1295–12302.CrossRef Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA. 2010;303(13):1295–12302.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Menezes Costa LC, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, Herbert RD, Costa LO. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):E613–24.CrossRef Menezes Costa LC, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, Herbert RD, Costa LO. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):E613–24.CrossRef
18.
22.
go back to reference Jellema P, van der Windt DA, van der Horst HE, Stalman WA, Bouter LM. Prediction of an unfavourable course of low back pain in general practice: comparison of four instruments. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(534):15–22 PMID: 17244419; PMCID: PMC2032695.PubMedPubMedCentral Jellema P, van der Windt DA, van der Horst HE, Stalman WA, Bouter LM. Prediction of an unfavourable course of low back pain in general practice: comparison of four instruments. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(534):15–22 PMID: 17244419; PMCID: PMC2032695.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Collins GS. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis: the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:55–63.CrossRef Collins GS. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis: the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:55–63.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. JMLR. 2011;12:2825–30. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. JMLR. 2011;12:2825–30.
34.
go back to reference Kim Ji-Hyun. Estimating classification error rate: Repeated cross-validation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009;53(11):3735–45. Elsevier. Kim Ji-Hyun. Estimating classification error rate: Repeated cross-validation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009;53(11):3735–45. Elsevier.
44.
go back to reference Piano L, Ritorto V, Vigna I, Trucco M, Lee H, Chiarotto A. Individual patient education for managing acute and/or subacute low back pain: little additional benefit for pain and function compared to placebo A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;0:1–47. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2022.10698 Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35584025.CrossRef Piano L, Ritorto V, Vigna I, Trucco M, Lee H, Chiarotto A. Individual patient education for managing acute and/or subacute low back pain: little additional benefit for pain and function compared to placebo A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;0:1–47. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2519/​jospt.​2022.​10698 Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35584025.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care
Authors
J. Knoop
W. van Lankveld
L. Beijer
F. J. B. Geerdink
M. W. Heymans
T. J. Hoogeboom
S. Hoppenbrouwers
E. van Overmeeren
R. Soer
C. Veenhof
K. C. P. Vissers
P. J. van der Wees
M. Sappelli
J. B. Staal
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05718-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022 Go to the issue